Means-end coherence, stringency, and subjective reasons

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 223-248

  Schroeder, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bratman; Broome; Ewing; Instrumental rationality; Intention; Means end coherence; Reasons; Setiya; Three envelope problem; Wide scope

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749173572     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-008-9200-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. M. Bratman 1981 Intention and means-end reasoning Philosophical Review 90 2 252 265
2. Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Bratman, M. Intention, belief, theoretical, practical. In J. Timmerman, J. Skorupski, & S. Robertson (Eds.), Spheres of reason (forthcoming).
4. J. Broome 1999 Normative requirements Ratio 12 4 398 419
5. J. Broome 2001 Normative practical reasoning Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75 175 193
6. Broome, J. (2004). Reasons. In Wallace, R. J., et al. (Eds.), Reason and value: Themes from the moral philosophy of Joseph Raz (pp. 28-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Darwall, S. (1983). Impartial reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Davidson, D. (1978). Intending. Reprinted in his Essays on actions and events (pp. 83-102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Ewing, A. C. (1953). Ethics. London: English Universities Press.
10. H. Gensler 1985 Ethical consistency principles Philosophical Quarterly 35 3 156 170
11. P. Greenspan 1975 Conditional oughts and hypothetical imperatives The Journal of Philosophy 72 10 259 276
12. Harman, G. (1976). Practical reasoning. Reprinted in his Reasoning, meaning, and mind (pp. 46-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
13. T. Hill 1973 The hypothetical imperative? The Philosophical Review 82 4 429 450
14. N. Kolodny 2005 Why be rational? Mind 114 3 509 563
15. N. Kolodny 2007 State or process requirements? Mind 116 2 371 385
16. Parfit, D. Climbing the mountain. Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
17. Raz, J. (2005a). The myth of instrumental rationality. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1(1), 2-28, http://www.jesp.org
18. Raz, J. (2005b). Instrumental rationality: A reprise. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1, 2-20, symposium, http://www.jesp.org
19. Regan, D. (1980). Utilitarianism and cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Ross, J. (2006). Acceptance and practical reason. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
21. M. Schroeder 2004 The scope of instrumental reason Philosophical Perspectives 18 Ethics 337 364
22. Schroeder, M. (2005). Instrumental mythology. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1, 2-12, symposium http://www.jesp.org
23. M. Schroeder 2007 Weighting for a plausible humean theory of reasons Noûs 41 1 138 160
24. Schroeder, M. (2007b). Slaves of the passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Schroeder, M. Having reasons. Philosophical Studies (forthcoming).
26. Setiya, K. 2007 Reasons without rationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. K. Setiya 2007 Cognitivism about instrumental reason Ethics 117 4 649 673
28. Tenenbaum, S. (2007). Appearances of the good: An essay on the nature of practical reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Toulmin, S. (1950). Reason in ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wallace, J. (2001). Normativity, commitment, and instrumental reason. Philosophers' Imprint, 1(3), http://www.philosophersimprint.org/001003
31. Williams, B. (1981). Internal and external reasons. Reprinted in his Moral Luck (pp. 100-110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.