Estimation of rates of births, deaths, and immigration from mark-recapture data

Biometrics

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 275-281

  O'Hara, R B ^a   Lampila, S ^b   Orell, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Births; Immigration; Mark recapture; Model checking; Survival; Tits

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; POPULATION STATISTICS;

BIRTH; BIRTH RATES; CAPTURE PROBABILITIES; DEATH RATES; IMMIGRATION; LONG TERM STUDY; MARK-RECAPTURE; MODELS CHECKING; SURVIVAL; TIT;

MODEL CHECKING;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION; IMMIGRATION; JUVENILE; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PASSERINE; PROBABILITY; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIRTH RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; IMMIGRANT; IMMIGRATION; JUVENILE; MARK RECAPTURE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MORTALITY; PARENT; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL STATUS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; SURVIVAL;

AVES; PARUS MONTANUS;

EID: 62749143016     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01048.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arjas, E. and Gasbarra, D. (1997). On prequential model assessment in life history analysis. Biometrika 84, 505 522.
2. Barry, S. C., Brooks, S. P., Catchpole, E. A., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2003). The analysis of ring-recovery data using random effects. Biometrics 59, 54 65.
3. Besbeas, P., Freeman, S. N., Morgan, B. J. T., and Catchpole, E. A. (2002). Integrating mark-recapture-recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters. Biometrics 58, 540 547.
4. Brooks S. P. and Gelman A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7, 434 455.
5. Brooks, S. P., Catchpole, E. A., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2000). Bayesian animal survival estimation. Statistical Science 15, 357 376.
6. Carothers, A. D. (1979). Quantifying unequal catchability and its effect on survival estimates in an actual population. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 863 869.
7. Coull, B. A. and Agresti, A. (1999). The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 55, 294 301.
8. Dorazio, R. M. and Royle, J. A. (2003). Mixture models for estimating the size of a closed population when capture rates vary among individuals. Biometrics 59, 351 364.
9. Fisher, R. A. and Ford, E. B. (1947). The spread of a gene in natural conditions in a colony of the moth Panaxia dominula L. Heredity 1, 143 174.
10. Gelman, A., Goegebeur, Y., Tuerlinckx, F., and Van Mechelen, I. (2000). Diagnostic checks for discrete data regression models using posterior predictive simulations. Applied Statistics 49, 247 268.
11. Johnson, D. S. and Hoeting, J. A. (2003). Autoregressive models for capture-recapture data: A Bayesian approach. Biometrics 59, 340 349.
12. Jolly, G. M. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52, 225 247.
13. King, R. and Brooks, S. P. (2002). Bayesian model discrimination for multiple strata capture-recapture data. Biometrika 89, 785 806.
14. Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D. R. (1992). Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62, 67 118.
15. Link, W. A. (2003). Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities. Biometrics 59, 1123 1130.
16. Link, W. A. and Barker, R. J. (2005). Modeling association among demographic parameters in analysis of open population capture-recapture data. Biometrics 61, 46 54.
17. Manel S., Gaggiotti, O. E., and Waples, R. S. (2005). Assignment methods: Matching biological questions techniques with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 136 142.
18. Mäntyniemi, A. (2006). Bayesian fisheries stock assessment: Integrating and updating knowledge. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
19. Mäntyniemi, S., Romakkaniemi, A., and Arjas, E. (2005). Bayesian removal estimation of a population size under unequal catchability. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62, 291 300.
20. Michielsens, C. G. J., McAllister, M. K., Kuikka, S., Pakarinen, T., Karlsson, L., Romakkaniemi, A., Perä, I., and Mäntyniemi, S. (2006). A Bayesian state-space mark-recapture model to estimate exploitation rates in mixed stock fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63, 321 334.
21. Orell, M. and Belda, E. (2002). Delayed cost of reproduction and senescence in the willow tit Parus montanus. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 55 64.
22. Orell, M. and Koivula, K. (1988). Cost of reproduction: Parental survival and production of recruits in the willow tit Parus montanus. Oecologia 77, 423 432.
23. Orell, M., Lahti, K., Koivula, K., Rytkönen, S., and Welling, P. (1999). Immigration and gene flow in a northern willow tit (Parus montanus) population. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, 283 295.
24. Pledger, S., Pollock, K. H., and Norris, J. (2003). Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity, I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. Biometrics 59, 786 794.
25. Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., and Hines, J. E. (1990). Statistical inference for capture-recapture sampling. Wildlife Monographs 107, 1 97.
26. Pradel, R. (1996). Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52, 703 709.
27. Rivot, E. and Prévost, E. (2002). Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of capture-mark-recapture data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 1768 1784.
28. Rivot, E., Prévost, E., Parent, E., and Baglinière, J. L. (2004). A Bayesian state-space modelling framework for fitting a salmon stage-structured population dynamic model to multiple time series of field data. Ecological Modelling 179, 463 485.
29. Seber, G. A. F. (1965). A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52, 249 259.
30. Siffczyk, C., Brotons, L., Kangas, K., and Orell, M. (2003). Home range size of willow tits: A response to winter habitat loss. Oecologia 136, 635 642.
31. Tanner, M. A. and Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Society 82, 528 540.
32. White, G. C. and Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 Supplement, 120 138.
33. Zippin, C. (1956). An evaluation of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics 12, 163 169.