The importance of: Deep reading

Educational Leadership

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 32-37

  Wolf, Maryanne ^a   Barzillai, Mirit ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749107936     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bolger, D., Perfetti, C, & Schneider, W (2005). Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structures plus writing system variation. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 92-104.
2. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Atlantic Monthly, 301(6). Available: www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google
3. Dalton, B., Pisha, B., Eagleton, M., Coyne, R, & Deysher, S. (2002). Engaging the test: Reciprocal teaching and questioning strategies in a scaffolded learning environment [Final report to the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs]. Peabody, MA: CAST.
4. Dalton, B., & Proctor, C. P. (2008). The changing landscape of text and comprehension in the age of new literacies. InJ. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 297-324). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Dunne, J. (1993). Love's mind: An essay on contemplative life. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
6. Eastin, M. S., Yang, M. S., & Nathanson, A. I. (2006). Children of the Net: An empirical exploration into the evaluation of Internet content. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 50(2), 211-230.
7. Foorman, B. R., & Al Otaiba, S. (in press). Reading remediation: State of the art. In K. Pugh and R McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice. San Antonio, TX: Pro-Ed.
8. Kamil, M. L, & Lane, D. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp.321-341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Keller, T. A., Carpenter, R A., & Just, M. A. (2001). The neural bases of sentence comprehension: A fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cerebral Cortex, 11(3), 223-237.
10. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. Reading Online, 7(5). Available: www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit-index.asp?HREF=/ newliteracies/leu
11. MacArthur, C. A., & Haynes, J. B. (1995). Student assistant for learning from text (SALT): A hypermedia reading aid. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(3), 50-59.
12. Rose, D., & Dalton, B. (2008). Learning in the digital age. In K. W Fisher & T Katzir (Eds.), Building usable knowledge in mind, brain, and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Sandak, R., Mencl, W E., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurological basis of skilled and impaired reading: Recent findings and new directions. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 273-292.
14. Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F, Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. PNAS, 102, 8781-8785. Available: www.hku.hk/fmri/index/j ournals/Tan-Siok-PN AS-2005.pdf
15. Tenner, E. (2006, March 26). Searching for dummies. The New York Times, p. 12.
16. Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins.
17. Wolf, M., Miller, L, & Donnelley, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary, elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading interaction program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375-386.