The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: An in vitro study

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 511-513

  Wahab, Lamia Abdel ^a   Sadig, Walid ^b  

^a MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Saudi Arabia)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNETISM; MANDIBLE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; MAGNETICS; MANDIBLE;

EID: 62649171853     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. TrakasT, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: A literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34.
2. Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: A cross-over clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:99-105.
3. Burns DFl Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: Consensus and controversy. J Prosthodont 2000;9:37-46.
4. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:19-25.
5. Sogo N, Maeda Y, Horisaka M. Mandibular edentulous case. In: Maeda Y, Walmsely D (eds). Implant Dentistry with New Generation Magnetic Attachments: Maximum Results with Minimum Number of Implants. Osaka, Tokyo: Quintessence, 2005: 112-113.