Correlation between static foot type measurements and clinical assessments

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 205-212

  Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit ^a   Nunley, James A ^a   Queen, Robin M ^a,b  

^a DUMC 3435 ^*

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Foot type; Static measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FOOT; FOOT RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METATARSAL BONE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VARIANCE;

DERMATOGLYPHICS; FOOT DEFORMITIES; FOOT JOINTS; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 62649144120     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0205     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arangio, GA; Wasser, T; Rogman, A: Radiographic comparison of standing medial cuneiform arch height in adults with and without acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 27:636-638, 2006.
2. Cains, LE; Nicholson, LL; Adams, RD; Burns, J: Foot morphology and foot ankle injury in indoor football. J Sci Med Sport, 2006.
3. Cavanagh, P; Morag, E; Boulton, A: The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomechanics. 30:243-250, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00136-4
4. Cavanagh, P; Rodgers, M: The Arch Index: A Useful Measure from Footprints. Journal of Biomechanics. 20:547- 551, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7
5. Cavanagh, P; Rodgers, M: The Arch Index: A Useful Measure from Footprints. Journal of Biomechanics. 20:547- 551, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7
6. Chu, W; Lee, S; Chu, W; Wang, T; Lee, M: The use of arch index to chracterize arch height: a digital image processing approach. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 42:1088-1093, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ 10.469375
7. Chu, W; Lee, S; Chu, W; Wang, T; Lee, M: The use of arch index to chracterize arch height: a digital image processing approach. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 42:1088-1093, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ 10.469375
8. Clement, DB; Taunton, JE: A guide to the prevention of running injuries. Can Fam Physician. 26:543-548, 1980.
9. Cowan, DN; Jones, BH; Robinson, JR: Foot morphologic characteristics andrisks of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med. 2:773-777, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfami.2.7.773
10. Gould, N: Evaluation of hyperpronation and pes planus in adults. Clinical Orthop Related Research. 181:37-45, 1983.
11. Gould, N: Graphing the adult foot and ankle. Foot Ankle. 2:213-219, 1982.
12. Hawes, MR; Nachbauer, W; Sovak, D: Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle 13:22- 26, 1992.
13. James, SL; Bates, BT; Osternig, LR: Injuries to runners. Am J Sports Med. 6:40-50, 1978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/036354657800600202
14. Kanatli, Uu; Gözil, RR; Besli, KK; Yetkin, HH; Bölükbasi, SS: The relationship between the hindfoot angle and the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. Foot Ankle Int. 27:623-627, 2006.
15. Kaufman, KR; Brodine, SK; Shaffer, RA; Johnson, CW; Cullison, TR: The effect of foot structure ana range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med. 27:585-593, 1999.
16. Ledoux, WR; Rohr, ES; Ching, RP; Sangeorzan, BJ: Effect of foot shape on the three-dimensional position of foot bones. J Orthop Res. 24:2176-2186, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.20262
17. Ledoux, WR; Shofer, JB; Ahroni, JH: Biomechanical differences among pes cavus, neutrally aligned; pes planus feet in subjects with diabetes Foot Ankle Int. 24:845-850, 2003.
18. Levy, JC; Mizel, MS; Wilson, LS; et al.: Incidence of foot and ankle injuries in West Point cadets with pes planus compared to the general cadet population. Foot Ankle Int. 27:1060-1064, 2006.
19. Lysholm, J; Wiklander, J: Injuries in runners. Am J Sports Med. 15:168-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/036354658701500213
20. Mall, N; Hardaker, W; Nunley, J; Queen, R: The reliability and reproducibility of foot type measurements using a mirrored foot photo box and digital photography compared to caliper measurements. J Biomechanics. 40:1171-1176, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.021
21. Manoli, A; Graham, B: The Subtle Cavus Foot, " the Underpronator," a Review. Foot and Ankle International. 26:256-263, 2005.
22. McKenzie, DC; Clement, DB; Taunton, JE: Running shoes orthotics; injuries. Sports Med. 2:334-347, 1985.
23. McPoil, TG; Cornwall, MW: Use of plantar contact area to predict medial longitudinal arch height during walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 96:489-494, 2006.
24. McPoil, TG; Thomas, G; Cornwall, MW; Mark, W: Use of the longitudinal arch angle to predict dynamic foot posture in walking. J Am Pod Med Assoc. 95:114-120, 2005.
25. Mei-Dan, OO; Kahn, GG; Zeev, AA; et al.: The medial longitudinal arch as a possible risk factor for ankle sprains: a prospective study in 83 female infantry recruits. Foot Ankle Int. 26:180-183, 2005.
26. Michelson, JD; Durant, DM; McFarland, E: The injury risk associated with pes planus in athletes. Foot Ankle Int. 23:629-633, 2002.
27. Nachbauer, W; Nigg, BM: Effects of arch height of the foot on ground reaction forces in running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1992.
28. Pedowitz, WJ; Kovatis, P: Flatfoot in adult. J Am Acad orthop Surg. 3:293-302, 1995.
29. Queen, R; Mall, N; Hardaker, W; Nunley, J: Describing the Medial Longitudinal Arch Using Footprint Indices. Foot and Ankle International. 28:456-462, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0456
30. Rose, G; Welton, E; Marshall, T: The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 67-B:71-78, 1985.
31. Saltzman, CL; Nawoczenski, DA; Talbot, KD: Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 76:45-49, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80041-7
32. Shiang, TY; Lee, SH; Lee, SJ: Evaluating different footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height. IEEE Engineering Med Biology:62-66, 1998.
33. Sobel, E; Levitz, S; Caselli, M; Brentnall, Z; Tran, MQ: Natural history of the rearfoot angle: preliminary values in 150 children. Foot Ankle Int. 20:119-125, 1999.
34. Staheli, LT; Chew, DE; Corbett, M: The Longitudinal Arch: a survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am:426-428, 1987.
35. Subotnick, SI: The biomechanics of running: implications for the prevention of foot injuries. Sports Med. 2:144-153, 1985.
36. Taiemela, S; Kujala, U; Osterman, K: Intrinsic risk factors and athletic injuries. Sports Med. 14:320-335, 1990.
37. Williams, D; McClay, I: Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 80:864-871, 2000.
38. Williams, DS; McClay, IS; Hamill, J: Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomechanics. 16:341-347, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0268-0033(01)00005-5
39. Zifchock, RA; Rebecca, A; Davis, II; Hillstrom, HH; Song, JJ: The effect of gender, age; lateral dominance on arch height and arch stiffness. Foot Ankle Int. 27:367-372, 2006.