Incidence of foot and ankle injuries in west point cadets with pes planus compared to the general cadet population

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1060-1064

  Levy, Jonathan C ^a   Mizel, Mark S ^a,b   Wilson, L Samuel ^a   Fox, William ^a   McHale, Kathleen ^a   Taylor, Dean C ^a   Temple, H Thomas ^a  

^a Orthopaedic Surgery ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Flatfeet; Foot Pressure Measurement; Lower Extremity Injury; Pes Planus

Indexed keywords

ANKLE INJURY; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FLATFOOT; FOOT INJURY; GENDER; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INJURY SEVERITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845466215     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107110070602701211     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bonnet, WL; Baker, DR: Diagnosis of pes planus by X-ray. Radiology 46:36-45, 1946.
2. Cavanagh, PR; Rodgers MM: The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J. Biomech. 20:547-551, 1987.
3. Chu, WC; Lee, SH; Chu, W; Wang, TJ; Lee, MC: The use of arch index to characterize arch height: a digital image processing approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 42:1088-1093, 1995.
4. Clarke, HH: An objective method of measuring the height of the longitudinal arch in foot examinations. Res. Q. 4:99-107, 1933.
5. Cobey, JC; Sella, E: Standardizing methods of measurement of foot shape by including the effects of subtalar rotation. Foot Ankle 2:30-36, 1981.
6. Cowan, DN; Jones, BH; Robinson, JR: Foot morphologic characteristics and risk or exercise-related injury. Arch. Fam. Med. 2:773-777, 1993.
7. Cowan, DN; Robinson, JR; Jones BH; Polly, DW, Jr; Berrey, BH: Consistency of visual assessments of arch height among clinicians. Foot Ankle Int. 15:213-217, 1994.
8. Didia, BC; Omu, ET; Obuoforibo, AA: The use of footprint contact index II for classification of flat feet in a Nigerian population. Foot Ankle 7:285-289, 1987.
9. Forriol, F; Pascual, J: Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle 11:101-104, 1990.
10. Franco, AH: Pes cavus and pes pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys. Ther. 67:688-694, 1987.
11. Gudas CJ: Patterns of lower-extremity injury in 224 runners. Compr. Ther. 6:50-59, 1980.
12. Hawes, MR; Nachbauer, W; Sovak, D; Nigg, BM: Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle 13:22-26, 1992.
13. Irwin, LW: A study of the tendency of school children to develop flat-footedness. Res. Q. 8:46-53, 1937.
14. Kaufman, KR; Brodine, SK; Shaffer, RA; Johnson, CW; Cullison, TR: The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am. J. Sports Med. 27:585-593, 1999.
15. Koplan, JP; Powell, KE; Sikes, RK; Shirley, RW; Campbell, CC: An epidemiologic study of the benefits and risks of running. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 248:3118-3121, 1982.
16. Lindsey, JM; Michelson, JD; MacWilliams, BA; Sponseller, PD; Miller, NH: The foot in Marfan syndrome: clinical findings and weight-distribution pattern. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 18:755-759, 1998.
17. Michelson, JD; Durant, DM; McFarland, E: The injury risk associated with pes planus in athletes. Foot Ankle Int. 23:629-633, 2002.
18. Nigg, BM; Cole, GK; Nachbauer, W: Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J. Biomech. 26:909-916, 1993.
19. Qamra, SR; Deodhar, SD; Jit, I: Podographical and metrical study for pes planus in a northwestern Indian population. Hum. Biol. 52:435-445, 1980.
20. Rose, GK; Welton, EA; Marshall, T: The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. J. Bone Joint Surg. 67-B:71-78, 1985.
21. Staheli, LT; Chew, DE; Corbett, M: The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty two feet in normal children and adults. J. Bone Joint Surg. 69-A:426-428, 1987.
22. Tareco, JM; Miller, NH; MacWilliams, BA; Michelson, JD: Defining flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 20:456-460, 1999.
23. Volpon, JB: Footprint analysis during the growth period. J. Pediar. Orthop. 14:83-85, 1994.
24. Welton, EA: The Harris and Beath footprint: interpretation and clinical value. Foot Ankle 13:462-468, 1992.