The effects of tariffs on coalition formation in a dynamic global warming game

Economic Modelling

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 641-649

  Lessmann, Kai ^a   Marschinski, Robert ^a   Edenhofer, Ottmar ^a  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Coalition stability; International cooperation; Self enforcing international environmental agreements; Trade sanctions

Indexed keywords

EID: 62649142273     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2009.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aldy J.E., Orszag P.R., and Stiglitz J.E. Climate change: an agenda for global collective action. Prepared for the conference on The Timing of Climate Change Policies, Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2001)
2. Bank for International Settlements, 2004. Annual Report 2004/05. http://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2005g2.pdf
3. Barker T., Haoran P., Köhler J., Warren R., and Winne S. Decarbonising the global economy with induced technological change: scenarios to 2100 using E3MG. The Energy Journal 27 (2006) 143-160
4. Barrett S. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers 46 (1994) 878-894
5. Barrett S. The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements. Resource and Energy Economics 19 (1997) 345-361
6. Barrett S. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Benedick R.E. Striking a new deal on climate change. Issues in Science and Technology 18 1 (2001) 71-76
8. Bernstein P.M., Montgomery W.D., and Rutherford T.F. Global impacts of the Kyoto Agreement: results from the MS-MRT model. Resource and Energy Economics 21 (1999) 375-413
9. Biermann F., and Brohm R. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the United States: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border. Climate Policy 4 3 (2005) 289-302
10. Bosetti V., Carraro C., and Galeotti M. The dynamics of carbon and of energy intensity in a model of endogenous technical change. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, May (2004)
11. Bosetti V., Carraro C., Galeotti M., Massetti E., and Tavoni M. WITCH: a world induced technical change hybrid model. The Energy Journal, Special Issue Hybrid Modelling of Energy Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down (2006) 13-38
12. Carraro C., and Siniscalco D. Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics 52 (1992) 309-328
13. Carraro C., Buchner B., Cersosimo I., and Marchiori C. Back to Kyoto? US Participation and the linkage between R&D and climate Cooperation. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 688; FEEM Working Paper No. 22.2002 (2002)
14. Crassous R., Hourcade J.C., and Sassi O. Endogenous structural change and climate targets modeling experiments with Imaclim-R. Energy Journal 27 (2006) 259-276
15. Edenhofer O., Bauer N., and Kriegler E. The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: insights from the model MIND. Ecological Economics 54 2-3 (2005) 277-292
16. Edenhofer O., Lessmann K., Kemfert C., Grubb M., and Koehler J. Induced technological change: exploring its implications for the economics of atmospheric stabilization - synthesis report from the innovation modeling comparison project. Energy Journal, Special Issue Endogenous Technological Change and the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilisation (2006) 57-107
17. Eyckmans J., and Tulkens H. Simulating coalitionally stable burden sharing agreements for the climate change problem. Resource and Energy Economics 25 (2003) 299-327
18. Feenstra R.C., Markusen J.R., and Rose A.K. Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics 34 2 (2001) 430-447
19. Finus M., and Rundshagen B. Strategic links between environmental and trade policies if plant location is endogenous. Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 283, Diskussionsbeitrag des Fachbereichs Wirtschaftswissenschaften der FernUniversität Hagen (2000)
20. Flechsig, M., Böhm, U., Nocke, T., Rachimow, C., 2008. The Multi-Run Simulation Environment SimEnv. Version 2.01. See http://www.pik-potsdam.de/software/simenv/
21. Gerlagh R. ITC in a global growth-climate model with CCS. Energy Journal, Special Issue: Endogenous Technological Change and the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilisation (2006) 55-72
22. IPCC. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000), Cambridge University Press
23. Ismer R., and Neuhoff K. Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading. European Journal of Law and Economics 24 2 (2007) 137-164
24. Jones C.I., and Williams J.C. Measuring the social return to R&D. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1998) 1119-1135
25. Kehoe T.J., Levine D.K., and Romer P.M. On characterizing equilibria of economies with externalities and taxes as solutions to optimization problems. Economic Theory 2 (1992) 43-68
26. Kemfert C. An integrated assessment model of economy-energy-climate - the model Wiagem. Integrated Assessment 3 4 (2002) 281-298
27. Kemfert C. Climate coalitions and international trade: assessment of cooperation incentives by issue linkage. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 455-465
28. Kypreos S., and Bahn O. A MERGE model with endogenous technological progress. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 8 (2003) 249-259
29. Leimbach M., and Edenhofer O. Technological spillovers within multi-region models: Intertemporal optimization beyond the Negishi approach. Economic Modelling 24 (2007) 272-294
30. Negishi T. Welfare economics and existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Metroeconomica 12 (1960) 92-97
31. Nordhaus W.D. Managing the Global Commons (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
32. Nordhaus W.D. Is the Kyoto Protocol a dead duck? Are there any live ducks around? Comparison of alternative global tradable emissions regimes, cited in: Barrett, S., Stavins, R., 2003: Increasing Participation and Compliance in International Climate Change Agreements. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 3 (1998) 349-376
33. Nordhaus W.D., and Yang Z. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. The American Economic Review 86 (1996) 741-765
34. Petschel-Held G., Schellnhuber H., Bruckner T., Tóth F.L., and Hasselmann K. The tolerable windows approach: theoretical and methodological foundations. Climatic Change 41 (1999) 303-331
35. Perez O. Multiple regimes, issue linkage, and international cooperation: exploring the role of the WTO. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 26 (2005) 735-778
36. Popp D. ENTICE: endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 1 (2004) 742-768
37. Ramsey F. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38 (1928) 543-559
38. Schelling T.C. What makes greenhouse sense? Time to rethink the Kyoto Protocol. Foreign Affairs 81 3 (2002) 2-9
39. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (2007), Cambridge University Press
40. Stiglitz J.E. Making Globalization Work (2006), W.W. Norton & Company, New York
41. Turnovsky S.J. International Macroeconomic Dynamics (1997), MIT Press
42. WTO. International Trade Statistics 2007 (2007), WTO Publications, Geneva, Switzerland