Staging of T3 and T4 gastric carcinoma with multidetector: Added value of multiplanar reformations for prediction of adjacent organ invasion

Radiology

Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 767-775

  Kim, Young Hoon ^a,b   Lee, Kyoung Ho ^a,b   Park, Seong Ho ^c,d   Kim, Hyung Ho ^a   Hahn, Seokyung ^e   Park, Do Joong ^a   Lee, Hye Seung ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^d Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e College of Medicine ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIAPHRAGM; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; LIVER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MESOCOLON; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREAS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPLEEN; STOMACH CARCINOMA; TRANSVERSE COLON;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 62649114605     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2502071872     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Minami M, Kawattchi N. Itai Y, Niki T. Sasaki Y. Gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1992;185:173-178.
2. Ziegler K. Sanft C, Zimmer T. et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography. and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1993:34:604-610.
3. Fukuya T. Honda H, Kaneko K, et al. Efficacy of helical CT in T-staging of gastric cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:73-81.
4. Rossi M, Broglia L. Maccioni F, et al. Hydro-CT in patients with gastric cancer: preoperative radiologic staging. Eur Radiol 1997;7:859-664.
5. Rossi M, Broglia L, Graziano P, et al. Local invasion of gastric cancer: CT findings and pathologic correlation using 5-mni incremental scanning, hypotonia, and water filling. AJR, 4m J Roentgenol 1999;172:383-388.
6. Paramo JC, Gomez G. Dynamic CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with gastric cancer: correlation with surgical findings and pathology. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:379-384.
7. Dux M, Richter GM. Hansmann J, Kuntz C, Kauffmann GW. Helical hydro-CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:913-922.
8. Habermann CR. Weiss F, Riecken R, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 2004;230:465-471.
9. Polkowski M. Palucki J, Wronska E, Szawlowski A. Nasierowska-Guttmejer A. Butruk E. Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2004;36:617-623.
10. Wei WZ, Yu JP, Li J, Liu CS. Zheng XH. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT in staging gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:4592-4595.
11. Bhandari S. Shim CS. Kim JH, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathologv. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:619-628.
12. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST. et al. Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 2005;236:879-885.
13. Kumano S, Murakami T, Kim T. et al. T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2005;237:981-966.
14. Shimizu K, Ito K, Matsiuiaga N, Shimizu A, Kawakami Y. Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction: CT-histologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1152-1158.
15. Hur J, Park MS, Lee JH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;30:372-377.
16. Chen CY. Hsu JS, Wu DC. et al. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT-correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology 2007;242:472-482.
17. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 1995;345:745-748.
18. Cuschieri A, Payers P, Fielding J, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after Dl and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 1998;347:995-999.
19. Otsuji E, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, Okamoto K, Takahashi T. Total gastrectomy with simultaneous pancreatico splenectomy or splenectomy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1789-1793.
20. Kasakura Y, Fujii M, Mochizuki F, Kochi M, Kaiga T. Is there a benefit of pancreaticosplenectomy with gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer? Am J Surg 2000;179:237-242.
21. Shchepotin IB, Chomy VA, Nauta RJ, Shabahang M, Buras RR, Evans SR. Extended surgical resection in T4 gasftic cancer. Am J Surg 1998;175:123-126.
22. Kitamura K, Tani N, Koike H, et al. Combined resection of the involved organs in T4 gastric cancer. Hep atog astro enter ologv 2000;47:1769-1772.
23. Dhar DK, Kubota H, Tachibana M, et al. Prognosis of T4 gastric carcinoma patients: an appraisal of aggressive surgical treatment. J Surg Oncol 2001;76:278-282.
24. Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Surgical outcomes in patients with T4 gastric carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:223-230.
25. TsuburayaA, Noguchi Y, Matsumoto A, Kobayashi S, Masukawa K, Horiguchi K. A preoperative assessment of adjacent organ invasion by stomach carcinoma with high, resolution computed tomography. Surg Today 1994;24:299-304.
26. Adachi Y. Sakino I. Matsumata T, et al. Preoperative assessment of advanced gastric carcinoma using computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:872-875.
27. Davies J, Chalmers AG. Sue-Ling HM. et al. Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging. Gut 1997;41:314-319.
28. Colen KL, Marcus SG, Newman E, Berman RS, Yee H. Hiotis SP. Multiorgan resection for gastric cancer: intraoperative and computed tomography assessment of locally advanced disease is inaccurate. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:899-902.
29. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York. NY: Springer, 2002.
30. Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 1997;53:567-578.
31. Obuchowski NA. On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Stat Med 1998;17:1495-1507.
32. Andaker L, Morales O, Hojer H, Backstrand B, Borch K, Larsson J. Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in gastric malignancy. Surgery 1991;109:132-135.
33. Shirakawa T, Fukuda K, Tada S. New method for evaluation of perigastric invasion of gastric cancer bv right lateral position CT. Eur Radiol 1996;6:358-361.