Comparison of 1.5- And 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint

Radiology

Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 839-848

  Kijowski, Richard ^a   Blankenbaker, Donna G ^a   Davis, Kirkland W ^a   Shinki, Kazuhiko ^a   Kaplan, Lee D ^a   De Smet, Arthur A ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BONE LESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; KNEE INJURIES; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62649111189     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2503080822     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brief AA, Maurer SG, Di Cesare PE. Use of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate in the
2. management of osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:71-78.
3. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:889-895.
4. Jakob RP, Franz T, Gautier E, Mainil-Varlet P. Autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee: indication, results, and reflections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;401:170-184.
5. Towheed TE. Published meta-analyses of pharmacological therapies for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:836-837.
6. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, et al. Outcome and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up study of 948 patients. Arthroscopy 2005;21:958-964.
7. Englund M, Lohmander LS. Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2811-2819.
8. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:127-132.
9. Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D, Thomasson D. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:329-335.
10. Disler DG, Cohen MS, Krebs DE, Roy SH, Rosenthal DI. Dynamic evaluation of exercising leg muscle in healthy subjects with echo planar MR imaging: work rate and total work determine rate of T2 change. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:588-593.
11. Mohr A. The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32:396-402.
12. Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, et al. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1073-1080.
13. Rose PM, Demlow TA, Szumowski J, Quinn SF. Chondromalacia patellae: fat-suppressed MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:437-440.
14. Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1159-1166.
15. Heron CW, Calvert PT. Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients. Radiology 1992;183:839-844.
16. Gold GE, Fuller SE, Hargreaves BA, Stevens KJ, Beaulieu CF. Driven equilibrium magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: initial clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:476-481.
17. Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Haas SB. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1276-1284.
18. Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, Garrasco MA, Moraga C, Delgado I. Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings. Arthroscopy 2007;23:312-315.
19. Broderick LS, Turner DA, Renfrew DL, Schnitzer TJ, Huff JP, Harris C. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:99-103.
20. Rubenstein JD, Li JG, Majumdar S, Henkelman RM. Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degener ative cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1089-1096.
21. Mosher TJ, Pruett SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:178-182.
22. Hargreaves BA, Vasanawala SS, Nayak KS, Hu BS, Nishimura DG. Fat-suppressed steady-state free precession imaging using phase detection. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:210-213.
23. Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C, et al. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. Radiology 2005;236:140-150.
24. Kornaat PR, Reeder SB, Koo S, et al. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:338-344.
25. Link TM, Sell CA, Masi JN, et al. 3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology: ROC analysis in an experimental model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006;14:63-70.
26. Fischbach F, Bruhn H, Unterhauser F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequences. Acta Radiol 2003;46:67-73.
27. Barr C, Bauer JS, Malfair D, et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1318-1328.
28. Schroder RJ, Fischbach F, Unterhauser FN, Weiler A, Felix R, Bruhn H. Value of various MR sequences using 1.3 and 3.0 Tesla in analyzing cartilaginous defects of the patella in an animal model [in German]. Rofo 2004;176:1667-1673.
29. Noyes FR, Stabler CL. A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:303-313.
30. Kijowski R, Lu A, Block W, Grist T. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:168-173.
31. Henkelman RM. Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med Phys 1983;12:232-233.
32. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:139-174.