Harmony search algorithms for water and environmental systems

Studies in Computational Intelligence

Volumn 191, Issue , 2009, Pages 113-127

  Geem, Zong Woo ^a   Tseng, Chung Li ^b   Williams, Justin C ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c The Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Dam operation; Ecological optimization; Harmony search; Model parameter calibration; Water network design

Indexed keywords

EID: 62549161805     PISSN: 1860949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00185-7_7     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. BBC News, Sanitation 'best medical advance' (2007) (accessed October 20, 2008), http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6275001.stm
2. Rosing, K.E., ReVelle, C.S., Williams, J.C.: Maximizing species representation under limited resources: A new and efficient heuristic. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7, 91-98 (2002)
3. Cesario, L.: Modeling, analysis, & design of water distribution systems. American Water Works Association, Denver (1995)
4. Geem, Z.W., Tseng, C.L., Kim, J., et al.: Trenchless water pipe condition assessment using artificial neural network. In: Najafi, M., Osborn, L. (eds.) Pipelines 2007: Advances and experiences with trenchless pipeline projects. ASCE, Reston (2007)
5. Choi, W.S.: Water supply and sewerage. ChungMunGak, Seoul (1999)
6. Geem, Z.W.: Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization 38, 259-280 (2006)
7. Rossman, L.A.: EPANET2 users manual. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati (2000)
8. Alperovits, E., Shamir, U.: Design of optimal water distribution systems. Water Resources Research 13, 885-900 (1977)
9. Wu, Z.Y., Boulos, P.F., Orr, C.H., et al.: Using genetic algorithms to rehabilitate distribution systems. Journal of the American Water Works Association 93, 74-85 (2001)
10. Cunha, M.C., Sousa, J.: Water distribution network design optimization: simulated annealing approach. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 125, 215-221 (1999)
11. Eusuff, M., Lansey, K.E.: Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 129, 210-225 (2003)
12. Perelman, L., Ostfeld, A.: An adaptive heuristic cross-entropy algorithm for optimal design of water distribution systems. Engineering Optimization 39, 413-428 (2007)
13. Lin, M.D., Liu, Y.H., Liu, G.F., et al.: Scatter search heuristic for least-cost design of water distribution networks. Engineering Optimization 39, 857-876 (2007)
14. Geem, Z.W.: Particle-swarm harmony search for water network design. Engineering Optimization (in press)
15. Fujiwara, O., Kang, D.B.: A two-phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks. Water Resources Research 26, 539-549 (1990)
16. Reca, J., Martinez, J., Gil, C., et al.: Application of several meta-heuristic techniques to the optimization of real looped water distribution networks. Journal Water Resources Management 22, 1367-1379 (2008)
17. Zecchin, A.C., Simpson, A.R., Maier, H.R., et al.: Application of two ant colony optimization algorithms to water distribution system optimization. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 44, 451-468 (2006)
18. Cunha, M.C., Ribeiro, L.: Tabu search algorithms for water network optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 157, 746-758 (2004)
19. Reca, J., Martinez, J.: Genetic algorithms for the design of looped irrigation water distribution networks. Water Resources Research 42 (2006)
20. Schaake, J., Lai, D.: Linear programming and dynamic programming - application of water distribution network design (Report 116). MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)
21. Broad, D.R., Dandy, G.C., Maier, H.R.: Water distribution system optimization using metamodels. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 131, 172-180 (2005)
22. Maier, H.R., Simpson, A.R., Zecchin, A.C., et al.: Ant colony optimization for design of water distribution systems. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 129, 200-209 (2003)
23. Geem, Z.W.: Harmony search optimisation to the pump-included water distribution network design. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems (2008), doi:10.1080/10286600801919813
24. Geem, Z.W., Park, Y.: Harmony search for layout of rectilinear branched networks. WSEAS Transactions on Systems 6, 1349-1354 (2006)
25. Geem, Z.W.: Geometry layout for real-world tree networks using harmony search. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IICAI 2007), pp. 268-277 (2007)
26. Walters, G., Lohbeck, T.: Optimal layout of tree networks using genetic algorithms. Engineering Optimization 22, 27-48 (1993)
27. Walters, G., Smith, D.: Evolutionary design algorithm for optimal layout of tree networks. Engineering Optimization 24, 261-281 (1995)
28. Afshar, M.H., Marino, M.A.: Application of ant algorithm for layout optimization of tree networks. Engineering Optimization 38, 353-369 (2006)
29. Wikipedia, Dam (2002) (accessed October 23, 2008), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam
30. Heidari, M., Chow, V.T., Kokotovic, P.V., et al.: Discrete differential dynamic programming approach to water resources systems optimization. Water Resources Research 7, 273-282 (1971)
31. Wardlaw, R., Sharif, M.: Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 125, 25-33 (1999)
32. Teegavarapu, R.S.V., Simonovic, S.P.: Optimal operation of reservoir systems using simulated annealing. Water Resources Management 16, 401-428 (2002)
33. Geem, Z.W.: Optimal scheduling of multiple dam system using harmony search algorithm. In: Sandoval, F., Prieto, A.G., Cabestany, J., Grana, M. (eds.) IWANN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4507, pp. 316-323. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
34. Larson, R.E.: State increment dynamic programming. American Elsevier, New York (1968)
35. Wikipedia, Flood (2002) (accessed October 23,2008), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood
36. McCarthy, G.T.: The unit hydrograph and flood routing. In: Proceedings of Conference of the North Atlantic Division. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New London (1938)
37. Gill, M.A.: Flood routing by the Muskingum method. Journal of Hydrology 36, 353-363 (1978)
38. Tung, Y.K.: River flood routing by nonlinear Muskingum method. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 111, 1447-1460 (1985)
39. Yoon, J., Padmanabhan, G.: Parameter estimation of linear and nonlinear Muskingum models. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 119, 600-610 (1993)
40. Mohan, S.: Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models using genetic algorithm. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 123, 137-142 (1997)
41. Kim, J.H., Geem, Z.W., Kim, E.S.: Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using harmony search. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37, 1131-1138 (2001)
42. Das, A.: Parameter estimation for Muskingum models. ASCE Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 130, 140-147 (2004)
43. Geem, Z.W.: Parameter estimation for the nonlinear Muskingum model using BFGS technique. ASCE Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 132, 474-478 (2006)
44. Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: Harmony search theory and practice. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194, 3902-3933 (2005)
45. Fesanghary, M., Mahdavi, M., Minary-Jolandan, M., et al.: Hybridizing harmony search algorithm with sequential quadratic programming for engineering optimization problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 197, 3080-3091 (2008)
46. Geem, Z.W., Williams, J.C.: Harmony search and ecological optimization. International Journal of Energy and Environment 1, 150-154 (2007)
47. ReVelle, C., Williams, J.C., Boland, J.J.: Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 7, 71-80 (2002)
48. Masters, L., Clupper, N., Gaines, E., et al.: Biodiversity Research Consortium Species Database Manual, The Nature Conservancy, Boston (1995)
49. Csuti, B.S., Polasky, P.H., Williams, R.L., et al.: A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation 80, 83-97 (1997)
50. Rosing, K.E., ReVelle, C.S., Williams, J.C.: Maximizing species representation under limited resources: A new and efficient heuristic. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7, 91-98 (2002)