The personal factor in nutrition communication

Personalized Nutrition: Principles and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 169-183

  Bouwman, Laura I ^a   Koelen, Maria A ^a   Hiddink, Gerrit J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62549116788     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Department of Health, Choosing Health: making healthy choices easier, Public Health White Paper; Command paper CM 6374, U.K., 2004.
2. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, Living longer in good health - also a question of a healthy lifestyle. Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, The Hague, 2004.
3. World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.
4. Contento, I.R. et al., The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs and research: a review of research, J. Nutr. Educ., 27, 277, 1995.
5. Contento, I.R., Randell, J.S., and Basch, C.E., Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research, J. Nutr. Educ. Behav., 34, 2, 2002.
6. Curry, S.J. et. al., A Randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counselling with non-volunteer smokers, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 63(6), 1005, 2005.
7. Brug, J. et al., The impact of computer-tailored feedback on fat, fruit and vegetable intake, Health Educ. Behav., 25, 517, 1998.
8. Kreuter, M.W. and Stretcher, V.J., Do tailored behaviour change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisals? Results from a randomized trial, Health Educ. Res., 11, 97, 1996.
9. Sears, D.O. and Freedman J.L., Selective exposure to information: a critical review, in The Process and Effects of Mass Communication, Schramm, W. and Roberts, D.F., Eds., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1971, p. 209.
10. Petty, E.P. and Cacioppo, J.T., Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
11. Van der Pligt, J., Risk perception and self-protective behaviour, Eur. Psychol., 1(1), 34, 1996.
12. Rogers, R.W., Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation, in Social Psychology: A Source Book, Cacioppo, J.T. and Petty, R.E., Eds., Guilford Press, New York, 1983, p. 153.
13. Janz, N. and Becker, M.H., The health belief model: a decade later, Health Educ. Q., 11, 1, 1984.
14. Bandura, A., Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, Am. Psychol., 37,122, 1982.
15. Müller, M. and Kersten, S., Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies, Nat. Rev., 4, 315, 2003.
16. Weinstein, N.D., The precaution adoption process, Health Psychol., 7, 355, 1988.
17. Batra, R. and Ray, M.L., Advertising situations: the implications of differential involvement and accompanying affect responses, in Information Processing Research in Advertising, Harris, R.J., Ed., Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers, London, 1983, p. 127.
18. McGuire, W.J., Attitudes and attitude change, in Handbook of Social Psychology, Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E., Eds., Random House, New York, 1985, p. 233.
19. Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M., and Nebergall, R.E., Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgement-Involvement Approach. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1965.
20. Festinger, L., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1957.
21. Brug, J., Hospers, H., and Kok, G.J., Differences in psychosocial factors and fat consumption between stages of change for fat reduction, Psychol. Health, 12, 719, 1997.
22. Brug, J. et al., Self-rated dietary fat intake: association with objective assessment of fat, psychosocial factors and intention to change, J. Nutr. Educ., 26, 218, 1994.
23. Glanz, K., Brug, J., and Van Assema, P., Are awareness of dietary fat intake and actual fat consumption associated? A Dutch-American comparison, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 51, 542, 1997.
24. Lechner, L., Brug, J., and De Vries, H., Misconceptions of fruit and vegetable consumption: differences between objective and subjective estimation of intake, J. Nutr. Educ., 29, 313, 1997.
25. Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J., Prediction of goal directed behaviour: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 22, 453, 1986.
26. Gleicher, F. and Petty, R.E., Expectations of reassurance influence the nature of fearstimulated attitude change, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 28, 86, 1992.
27. Liberman, A. and Chaiken, S., Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 18, 669, 1992.
28. Koelen, M.A. and Lyklema, S., (in Dutch) De consument en perceptie van voedselveiligheid, in Ons Eten Gemeten. van Kreijl, C.F. and Knaap, A.G.A.C., Eds., Bohn, Stafleu, Van Loghum, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands, 2004, chap. 8.
29. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1127, 1974.
30. Koelen, M.A. and Van den Ban, A., Health Education and Health Promotion, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 2004.
31. Pechacek, T. and Danaher, B., How and why people quit smoking: a cognitivebehavioural analyses, in Cognitive Behavioural Intervention: Theory, Research and Procedures, Kendall, P. and Hollon, S., Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1979, p. 389.
32. Weinstein, N.D., Unrealistic optimism about future life events, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 39, 806, 1980.
33. Otten, W. and Van der Pligt, J., Risk and behaviour: the mediating role of risk appraisal, Acta Psychol., 80, 325, 1992.
34. Das, E.H.H.J., de Wit, J.B.F., and Stroebe, W., Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages, PSPB, 29, 650, 2003.
35. De Hoog, N., Stroebe, W., and de Wit, J.B.F., The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations, PSPB, 31(1), 24, 2005.
36. Zimbardo, P.G. and Leippe, M.R., The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1991.
37. Sutton, S.R., Fear arousing communications: a critical examination of theory and research, in Social Psychology and Behavioural Medicine, Eiser, J.R., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1982, chap. 13.
38. Green, L.W. and Kreuter, M.W., Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005.
39. Darnton-Hill, I.I., Margetts, B., and Deckelbaum, R., Public health nutrition and genetics: implications for nutrition policy and promotion, Proc. Nutr. Soc., 63, 173, 2004.
40. Marteau, T.M. and Lerman C., Genetic risk and behavioural change, BMJ, 322, 1056, 2001.
41. Haga, S.B., Khoury, M.J., and Burke, W., Genomic profiling to promote a healthy lifestyle: not ready for prime time yet, Commentary, Nat. Genet., 34(4), 347, 2003.
42. McCain, M. and Schmid, G., From Nutrigenomics Science to Personalized Nutrition: the market in 2010. Institute for the Future, Silicon Valley, California, 2003.
43. Massoud, M. et al., The Future of Nutrition: Consumers Engage with Science, Institute for the Future, Silicon Valley, California, 2001.
44. Marteau, T.M. and Croyle, R.T., The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing, BMJ, 316, 693, 1998.
45. Lerman, C. et. al., Genetic testing: psychosocial aspects and implications, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 70(3), 784, 2002.
46. World Health Organisation, The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World, Available at http://www.who.int/healthpromotion, 2005, accessed June 2006.