Modelling and inversion of local magnetic anomalies

Journal of Geophysics and Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 387-400

  Quesnel, Y ^a   Langlais, B ^b,c   Sotin, C ^d   Galdeano A ^e  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^d CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Champtoceaux complex; Crustal magnetized sources; Dipoles; Inversion; Magnetic anomalies; Modeling

Indexed keywords

AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY; INVERSE ANALYSIS; LITHOSPHERE; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIZATION; NUMERICAL MODEL;

CHAMPTOCEAUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; MAINE ET LOIRE; PAYS DE LA LOIRE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 62549111329     PISSN: 17422132     EISSN: 17422140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/5/4/003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Asfahani J and Tlas M 2007 A robust nonlinear inversion for the interpretation of magnetic anomalies caused by faults, thin dikes and spheres like structure using stochastic algorithms Pure Appl. Geophys. 164 2023-42
2. Ballèvre M, Kíenast J R and Paquette J L 1987 Le métamorphisme éclogitique dans la nappe hercynienne de Champtoceaux (Massif Armoricain, France) C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris II 305 127-31
3. Ballèvre M and Marchand J 1991 Zonation du métamorphisme éclogitique dans la nappe de Champtoceaux (Massif Armoricain, France) C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris II 312 705-11
4. Barbaroux L et al 1983 Carte géologique de la France au 1/50000: Nort-sur-Erdre BRGM Orléans edn
5. Barbosa V and Silva J 2006 Interactive 2D magnetic inversion: a tool for aiding forward modeling and testing geologic hypotheses Geophysics 71 L43-50
6. Berthe D, Choukroune P and Jegouzo P 1979 Orthogneiss, mylonite and noncoaxial deformation of granites: the example of the South Armorican Shear Zone J. Struct. Geol. 1 31-42
7. Bhattacharyya B 1966 Continuous spectrum of the total magnetic field anomaly due to a rectangular prismatic body Geophysics 31 97-121
8. Bitri A, Ballèvre M, Brun J P, Chantraine J, Gapais D, Guennoc P, Gumiaux C and Truffert C 2003 Imagerie sismique de la zone de collision hercynienne dans le Sud-Est du Massif Armoricain (projet Armor2/programme Géofrance 3D) C. R. Geosci. 335 969-79
9. Blakely R 1995 Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
10. Bosse V, Feraud G, Ruffet G, Ballèvre M, Peucat J J and De Jong K 2000 Late Devonian subduction and early-orogenic exhumation of eclogite-facies rocks from the Champtoceaux Complex (Variscan belt, France) Geol. J. 35 297-325
11. Boukerbout H and Gibert D 2006 Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: two-dimensional ridgelet analysis J. Geophys. Res. 111 B07104 (doi:10.1029/2005JB004078)
12. Chantraine J, Autran A and Cavelier C 1996 Carte géologique de la France au 1/1000000 BRGM Orléans edn
13. Friis-Christensen E, Lühr H and Hulot G 2006 Swarm: a constellation to study the Earth's magnetic field Earth Planets Space 58 351-8
14. Gaucher E 1965 Quantitative interpretation of the 'Montagne du Sorcier' magnetic anomaly, Chibougamau, Quebec Geophysics 30 762-82
15. Gopala Rao D and Krishna K 2002 Magnetic rock properties of the gabbros from the ODP Drill Hole 1105A of the Atlantis Bank, Southwest Indian Ridge Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Earth Planet. Sci. 111 467-81
16. Gumiaux C 2003 Modélisation du cisaillement hercynien de Bretagne Centrale : déformation crustale et implications lithosphériques PhD Thesis Université de Rennes I
17. Hemant K and Maus S 2005 Geological modeling of the new CHAMP magnetic anomaly maps using a geographical information system technique J. Geophys. Res. 110 B12103 (doi:10.1029/2005JB003837)
18. Hood P 1965 Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying Geophysics 30 891-902
19. Hornby P, Boschetti F and Horowitz F 1999 Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain Geophys. J. Int. 137 175-96
20. Hsu S K, Coppens D and Shyu C T 1998 Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytical signal Geophysics 63 1947-57
21. Jegouzo P 1980 The South Armorican Shear Zone J. Struct. Geol. 2 39-47
22. Jegouzo P, Peucat J J and Audren C 1986 Caractérisation et signification géodynamique des orthogneiss calco-alcalins d'ge ordovicien de Bretagne méridionale Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. 5 839-48
23. Johnson W 1969 A least-squares method of interpreting magnetic anomalies caused by two-dimensional structures Geophysics 34 65-74
24. Koulomzine T, Lamontagne Y and Nadeau A 1970 New methods for the direct interpretation of magnetic anomalies caused by inclined dikes of infinite length Geophysics 35 812-30
25. Li Y and Oldenburg D 1996 3-D inversion of magnetic data Geophysics 61 394-408
26. Lienert B and Wasilewski P 1979 A magnetic study of the serpentinization process at Burro Mountain, California Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 43 406-16
27. Macmillan S et al 2003 The 9th-Generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field Geophys. J. Int. 155 1051-6
28. Marchand J 1981 Ecaillage d'un 'mélange tectonique' profond: le complexe cristallophyllien de Champtoceaux (Bretagne méridionale) C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris II 293 223-8
29. Marchand J, Sellier D, Bossière G, Carlier G, Deniel C and Lasnier B 1988 Carte géologique de la France au 1/50000: Savenay (Orléans: BRGM)
30. Martelet G, Calcagno P, Gumiaux C, Truffert C, Bitri A, Gapais D and Brun J 2004 Integrated 3D geophysical and geological modelling of the Hercynian suture zone in the Champtoceaux area (South Brittany, France) Tectonophysics 382 117-28
31. Mayhew M A 1979 Inversion of satellite magnetic anomaly data J. Geophys. 45 119-28
32. Mayhew M A 1982 Application of satellite magnetic anomaly data to Curie isotherm mapping J. Geophys. Res. 87 4846-54
33. Mayhew M A, Johnson B D and Wasilewski P J 1985 A review of problems and progress in studies of satellite magnetic anomalies J. Geophys. Res. 90 2511-22
34. McGrath P and Hood P 1973 An automatic least-squares multimodel method for magnetic interpretation Geophysics 38 349-58
35. Moreau F, Gibert F, Holschneider M and Saracco G 1997 Wavelet analysis of potential fields Inverse Problems 13 165-78
36. Nicolosi I, Blanco-Montenegro I, Pignatelli A and Chiappini M 2006 Estimating the magnetization direction of crustal structures by means of an equivalent source algorithm Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 155 163-9
37. Oufi O, Cannat M and Horen H 2002 Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized abyssal peridotites J. Geophys. Res. 107 2095
38. Parker Gay S 1965 Standard curves for magnetic anomalies over long horizontal cylinders Geophysics 30 818-28
39. Parker R L 1975 The theory of ideal bodies for gravity interpretation Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 42 315-34
40. Parker R L, Shure L and Hildebrand J 1987 The application of inverse theory to seamount magnetism Rev. Geophys. 25 17-40
41. Peters L 1949 The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application Geophysics 14 290-320
42. Plouff D 1976 Gravity and magnetic fields of polygonal prisms and application to magnetic terrain corrections Geophysics 41 727-41
43. Purucker M, Langel R, Rajaram M and Raymond C 1998 Global magnetization models with a priori information J. Geophys. Res. 103 2563-84
44. Purucker M, Langlais B, Olsen N, Hulot G and Mandea M 2002 The southern edge of cratonic North America: evidence from new satellite magnetometer observations Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 56-7
45. Quesnel Y 2006 Interprétation des données magnétiques martiennes: contraintes sur l'évolution primitive de Mars PhD Thesis Université de Nantes (Available at: http://www.bu.univ- nantes.fr/sciences/docnum/2006/quesnel-yoann.pdf)
46. Quesnel Y, Langlais B and Sotin C 2006 Derivation of local crustal magnetization using multiple altitude magnetic data Proc. 1st Swarm Meeting
47. Quesnel Y, Langlais B and Sotin C 2007 Local inversion of magnetic anomalies: implication for Mars' crustal evolution Planet. Space Sci. 55 258-69
48. Rao B, Radhakrishna Murthy I and Visweswara Rao C 1973 A computer program for interpreting vertical magnetic anomalies of spheres and horizontal cylinders Pure Appl. Geophys. 110 2056-65
49. Ravat D, Whaler K, Pilkington M, Sabaka T and Purucker M 2002 Compatibility of high-altitude aeromagnetic and satellite-altitude magnetic anomalies over Canada Geophysics 67 546-54
50. Reid A, Allsop J, Granser H, Millett A and Somerton I 1990 Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution Geophysics 55 80-91
51. Roest W and Pilkington M 1993 Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data Geophysics 58 653-9
52. Salem A and Ravat D 2003 A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data Geophysics 68 1952-61
53. Salem A, Ravat D, Gamey T and Ushijima K 2002 Analytical signal approach and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations J. Appl. Geophys. 49 231-44
54. Shive P 1990 The Ivrea Zone and lower crustal magnetization Tectonophysics 182 161-7
55. Shive P, Frost B and Peretti A 1988 The magnetic properties of metaperidotitic rocks as a function of metamorphic grade: implications for crustal magnetic anomalies J. Geophys. Res. 93 12187-95
56. Shuey R, Schellinger D, Tripp A and Alley L 1977 Curie depth determination from aeromagnetic spectra Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 50 75-101
57. Silva J 1989 Transformation of nonlinear problems into linear ones applied to the magnetic field of a two-dimensional prism Geophysics 54 114-21
58. Spector A and Grant F 1970 Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data Geophysics 35 293-302
59. Talwani M 1965 Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by bodies of arbitrary shape Geophysics 30 797-817
60. Tarantola A and Valette B 1982 Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20 219-32
61. Telford W, Geldart L P, Sheriff R and Keys D 1976 (1988 version) Applied Geophysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
62. Thompson D 1982 EULDPH-a new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data Geophysics 47 31-7
63. Truffert C, Gumiaux C, Chantraine J, Perrin J, Galdéano A, Gapais D, Ballèvre M, Asfirane F, Guennoc P and Brun J P 2001 Levé géophysique aéroporté dans le Sud-Est du Massif armoricain (programme GéoFrance3D Armor2). Magnétisme et radiométrie spectrale C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris II 333 263-70
64. Vacquier V and Affleck J 1941 A computation to the average depth to the bottom of the Earth's magnetic crust, based on a statistical study of local magnetic anomalies 'Transactions-American Geophysical Union' pp 446-50
65. Von Frese R, Hinze W and Braile L 1981 Spherical Earth gravity and magnetic anomaly analysis by equivalent point source inversion Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 53 69-83
66. Whaler K and Langel R 1996 Minimal crustal magnetizations from satellite data Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 98 303-19
67. Whitehill D 1973 Automated interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the vertical prism model Geophysics 38 1070-87