The Efficacy of Intravenous Patient-Controlled Remifentanil Versus Morphine Anesthesia After Coronary Artery Surgery

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 170-174

  Baltali, Sevim ^a   Turkoz, Ayda ^a   Bozdogan, Nesrin ^a   Demirturk, Orhan Saim ^a   Baltali, Mehmet ^a   Turkoz, Riza ^a   Arslan, Gulnaz ^a  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

cardiac surgery; morphine; postoperative multimodal analgesia; remifentanil

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; ISOFLURANE; MIDAZOLAM; MORPHINE; MORPHINE SULFATE; PARACETAMOL; PETHIDINE; REMIFENTANIL; THIOPENTAL; TRAMADOL; VECURONIUM;

ADD ON THERAPY; ADULT; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; COUGHING; DELIRIUM; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DROWSINESS; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INFUSION; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REST; SEDATION; SURGICAL PATIENT; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VOMITING;

AGED; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORPHINE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PIPERIDINES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS;

EID: 62549109560     PISSN: 10530770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kruger M., and McRae K. Pain management in cardiothoracic practice. Surg Clin North Am 79 (1999) 387-400
2. Duthie D.J. Remifentanil and tramadol. Br J Anaesth 81 (1998) 51-57
3. Bowdle T.A., Camporesi E.M., Maysick L., et al. A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 83 (1996) 1292-1297
4. Yarmush J., D'Angelo R., Kirkhart B., et al. A comparison of remifentanil and morphine sulfate for acute postoperative analgesia after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. Anesthesiology 87 (1997) 235-243
5. Rauf K., Vohra A., Fernandez-Jimenez P., et al. Remifentanil infusion in association with fentanyl-propofol anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Effects on morphine requirement and postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 95 (2005) 611-615
6. Schraag S., Kenny G.N., Mohl U., et al. Patient-maintained remifentanil target-controlled infusion for the transition to early postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 81 (1998) 365-368
7. Steinlechner B., Koinig H., Grubhofer G., et al. Postoperative analgesia with remifentanil in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 100 (2005) 1230-1235
8. Steinlechner B., Dworschak M., Birkenberg B., et al. Magnesium moderately decreases remifentanil dosage required for pain management after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 96 (2006) 444-449
9. Gurbet A., Goren S., Sahin S., et al. Comparison of analgesic effects of morphine, fentanyl, and remifentanil with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18 (2004) 755-758
10. Krishnan K., Elliot S.C., Berridge J.C., et al. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia following cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49 (2005) 876-879
11. Ramsay M.A., Savege T.M., Simpson B.R., et al. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 2 (1974) 656-659
12. Calderón E., Pernia A., De Antonio P., et al. A comparison of two constant-dose continuous infusions of remifentanil for severe postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 92 (2001) 715-719
13. Mueller X.M., Tinguely F., Tevaearai H.T., et al. Pain location, distribution, and intensity after cardiac surgery. Chest 118 (2000) 391-396
14. Reimer-Kent J. From theory to practice: preventing pain after cardiac surgery. Am J Crit Care 12 (2003) 136-143