Inlet conditions for LES using mapping and feedback control

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1299-1311

  Baba Ahmadi, M H ^a   Tabor, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; FEEDBACK CONTROL; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; TURBULENCE;

BODY FORCES; BULK PROPERTIES; CIRCULAR PIPES; COMPUTATIONAL MANIPULATIONS; FEEDBACK CONTROL ALGORITHMS; INLET CONDITIONS; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; RECTANGULAR CHANNELS;

FLOW SIMULATION;

EID: 62549104148     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams N.A., Kempe S.H.T., and Domaradzki J.A. Alternative approaches to large eddy simulation-implicit. ERCOFTAC (2005) 1-32
2. Baba-Ahmadi MH. Construction of inlet conditions for large eddy simulation. Ph.D. thesis, SECaM, University of Exeter; 2008.
3. Baba-Ahmadi M.H., and Tabor G. Inlet conditions for LES of gas-turbine swirl injectors. AIAA J 46 7 (2008) 1782-1790
4. Ferrante A., and Elghobashi S.E. A robust method for generating inflow conditions for direct simulations of spatially-developing boundary layers. J Comput Phys 198 (2004) 372
5. Fletcher C.A.J. Computational techniques for fluid dynamics. Springer series in computational physics. 2nd ed. vols. I-II (1991), Springer-Verlag
6. Fureby C., and Tabor G. Mathematical and physical constraints on large eddy simulations. Theor Comp Fluid Dyn 9 2 (1997) 75-83
7. Fureby C, Gosman AD, Tabor G, Weller HG, Sandham N, Wolfshtein M. Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. In: Proceedings of turbulent shear flows 11, vol. 3, p. 13-28.
8. Fureby C., Tabor G., Weller H., and Gosman A.D. A comparative study of sub grid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 9 5 (1997) 1416-1429
9. Fureby C., Tabor G., Weller H.G., and Gosman A.D. Differential subgrid stress models in large eddy simulations. Phys Fluids 9 11 (1997) 3578-3580
10. Fureby C., Tabor G., Weller H.G., and Gosman A.D. Large eddy simulation of the flow around a square prism. AIAA J 38 3 (2000) 442-452
11. Ghosal S., Lund T.S., Moin P., and Akselvoll K. A dynamic localization model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 286 (1995) 229-255
12. Issa R.I. Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J Comp Phys 62 (1986) 40-65
13. Iwamoto K. Database of fully developed channel flow. Tech. Rep. ILR-0201, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo; 2002.
14. Jasak H., Weller H., and Gosman A. High resolution NVD differencing scheme for arbitrarily unstructured meshes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 31 (1999) 431-449
15. Keating A., Piomelli U., Balaras E., and Kaltenbach H.J. A priori and a posteriori tests of inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation. Phys Fluids 16 12 (2004) 4696-4712
16. Klein M., Sadiki A., and Janicka J. A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. J Comp Phys 186 (2003) 652-665
17. Lee S., Lele S., and Moin P. Simulation of spatially evolving turbulence and the applicability of Taylor's hypothesis in compressible flow. Phys Fluids A 4 (1992) 1521-1530
18. Lund T.S., Wu X., and Squires K.D. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J Comp Phys 140 (1998) 233-258
19. di Mare L., Klein M., Jones W.P., and Janicka J. Synthetic turbulence inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation. Phys Fluids 18 2 (2006) 025-107
20. Pierce C.D., and Moin P. Method for generating equilibrium swirling inflow conditions. AIAA J 36 (1998) 1325-1327
21. Rhie C., and Chow W. A numerical study of the turbulent flow past an isolated airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J 21 7 (1983) 1225-1232
22. Schlüter J.U., Pitsch H., and Moin P. Large eddy simulation inflow conditions for coupling with Reynolds-averaged flow solvers. AIAA J 42 3 (2004) 478-484
23. Schmidt S, McIver DM, Blackburn HM, Rudman M, Nathan GJ. Spectral element based simulation of turbulent pipe flow. In: 14th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia; 2001.
24. Smirnov A., Shi S., and Celik I. Random flow generation technique for large eddy simulations and particle-dynamics modelling. J Fluids Eng 123 (2001) 359-371
25. Spalart P.R. Numerical study of sink-flow boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 172 (1986) 307
26. θ = 1410. JFM 187 (1988) 61-98
27. Spalart P.R., and Watmuff J.H. Experimental and numerical study of a turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 249 (1993) 337-371
28. Stefano G.D., and Vasilyev O.V. Sharp cutoff versus smooth filtering in large eddy simulation. Phys Fluids 14 1 (2002) 364-369
29. Tabor G., and Weller H.G. Large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion using ξ flame surface wrinkling model. Flow Turbul Combust 72 (2004) 1-28
30. Tabor G, Baba-Ahmadi MH, de Villiers E, Weller HG. Construction of inlet conditions for LES of turbulent channel flow. In: Proceedings of the ECCOMAS congress, Jyväskylä, Finland; 2004.
31. de Villiers E. The potential for large eddy simulation for the modelling of wall bounded flows. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College; 2006.
32. Walpot R., van der Geld C., and Kuerten J. Determination of the coefficients of langevin models for inhomogeneous turbulent flows by three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry and direct numerical simulation. Phys Fluids 19 (2007) 045102-045111
33. Wu X., and Moin P. A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow. JFM 608 (2008) 81-112