Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and expert testimony

Pain Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 373-380

  Kulich, Ronald ^a,b   Maciewicz, Raymond ^c   Scrivani, Steven J ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c PBS Medical Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Forensic medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Pain medicine; Sociocultural

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN REGION; CHRONIC PAIN; COURT; EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FORENSIC PATHOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEGAL EVIDENCE; MEDICAL EXPERT; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; BRAIN; FORENSIC MEDICINE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARDS;

BRAIN; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 62349142221     PISSN: 15262375     EISSN: 15264637     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00567.x     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Mandell A. Chair, Committee On Science And Law, are your thoughts your own? "Neuroprivacy" and the legal implications of brain imaging. Record 2005;60:2.
2. Thompson SK. The legality of the use of psychiatric neuroimaging in intelligence interrogation. Cornell Law Rev 2005;90:1601-38.
3. Tancredi LR, Brodie JD. The brain and behavior: Limitations in the legal use of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Law Med 2007;33:271-94.
4. Koshbin S, Stephens L. Imaging the mind, minding the image: An historical introduction to brain imaging and the law. Am J Law Med 2007;33:171-2.
5. Spence SA. The deceptive brain. J R Soc Med 2004;97:6-9.
6. Spence SA, Hunter MD, Farrow TF, et al. A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004;359:1755-62.
7. Faigman DL, Porter E, Saks ML. Check your crystal ball at the courthouse door, please: Exploring the past, understanding the present, and worrying about the future of scientific evidence. Cardozo Law Rev 1994;15:1799-810.
8. Bandettini PA, Ungerleider LG. From neuron to BOLD: New connections. Nat Neurosci 2001;4:864-6.
9. Bandettini PA, Wong EC, Jesmanowicz A, Hinks RS, Hyde JS. Spin-echo and gradient-echo EPI of human brain activation using BOLD contrast: A comparative study at 1.5 T. NMR Biomed 1994;7:12-20.
10. Evans KC, Banzett RB, Adams L, et al. BOLD fMRI identifies limbic, paralimbic, and cerebellar activation during air hunger. J Neurophysiol 2002;88:1500-11.
11. Saad ZS, Ropella KM, DeYoe EA, Bandettini PA. The spatial extent of the BOLD response. Neuroimage 2003;19:132-44.
12. Iannetti GD, Brooks JC. On the interpretation of temporal differences of BOLD fMRI responses to nociceptive stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:3718-9.
13. Ringler R, Greiner M, Kohlloeffel L, Handwerker HO, Forster C. BOLD effects in different areas of the cerebral cortex during painful mechanical stimulation. Pain 2003;105:445-53.
14. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Barrere B. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance image signals of a rat brain to changes in the cerebral venous blood oxygenation. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:205-10.
15. Ogawa S, Menon RS, Tank DW, et al. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys J 1993;64:803-12.
16. Anonymous. Frye v. United States. 1923.
17. Steinberg CE. The Daubert decision: An update on the Frye rule. Newsl Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1993;18:66-9.
18. Foster KR, Huber PW. Judging Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
19. Koop CE, Luoto J. "The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cancer," overview of a report of the Surgeon General. Public Health Rep 1982;97:318-24.
20. Parascandola M. Cigarettes and the US Public Health Service in the 1950s. Am J Public Health 2001;91:196-205.
21. Burch PR. The surgeon general's "epidemiologic criteria for causality." A critique. J Chronic Dis 1983;36:821-36.
22. Talley C, Kushner HI, Sterk CE. Lung cancer, chronic disease epidemiology, and medicine, 1948-1964. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2004;59:329-74.
23. Anonymous. Federal Rules of Evidence. 1975.
24. Anonymous. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U. S. 579, 597 (1993). 2005.
25. Kassirer JP, Cecil JS. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony, disorder in the courts. JAMA 2002;288:1382-7.
26. Kulich RJ, Driscoll J, Prescott J, et al. The Daubert standard, a primer for pain specialists. Pain Med 2003;4(1):1-6.
27. Petit M Jr. FMRI and BF meet FRE: Brain imaging and the federal rules of evidence. Am J Law Med 2007;33:319-40.
28. Kolber AJ. Pain detection and the privacy of subjective experience. Am J Law Med 2007;33:433-56.
29. Keckler CNW. Cross-examining the brain: A legal analysis of neural imaging for credibility impeachment. bepress Legal Series. Working Paper 568. 2005. Available at: http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/568 (accessed March 29, 2005).
30. Daniels DJ. The future is now: Reducing victimization through advances in criminal justice techniques. American Society of Criminology 54th Annual Meeting; 2002:1-10.
31. Anonymous. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361, 106 L. Ed. 2d 306, 109 S. Ct. 2969 (1989). 2004.
32. Anonymous. In Re Kevin Nigel Stanford. In Re Kevin Nigel Stanford, U.S.: U.S. S. Ct.; 2002. p. 968.
33. McCaffery M, Meinhart NT. Pain: A Nursing Approach to Assessment and Analysis. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1983.
34. Anonymous. Neal S. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Continental Casualty Company, Defendant. Smith v. Continental Casualty, 276 F. Supp. 2d: U.S. Dist.; 2003.
35. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center News Release. Brain imaging confirms that people feel pain differently. Report Researchers at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, 2003.
36. Kitamura Y, Kakigi R, Hoshiyama M, et al. Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following lower limb stimulation. J Neurol Sci 1997;145:187-94.
37. Spence SA, Farrow TF, Herford AE, et al. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 2001;12:2849-53.
38. Langleben DD, Loughead JW, Bilker WB, et al. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2005;26:262-72.
39. Langleben DD, Schroeder L, Maldjian JA, et al. Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 2002;15:727-32.
40. Cook DB, Lange G, Ciccone DS, et al. Functional imaging of pain in patients with primary fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2004;31:364-78.
41. Gracely RH, Petzke F, Wolf JM, Clauw DJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:1333-43.
42. Apkarian AV, Krauss BR, Fredrickson BE, Szeverenyi NM. Imaging the pain of low back pain: Functional magnetic resonance imaging in combination with monitoring subjective pain perception allows the study of clinical pain states. Neurosci Lett 2001;299:57-60.
43. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:613-23.
44. Casey KL, Lorenz J, Minoshima S. Insights into the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain through functional brain imaging. Exp Neurol 2003;184(suppl 1):S80-8.
45. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996;263:377-86.
46. Roux FE, Ibarrola D, Lazorthes Y, Berry I. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study: Technical case report. Neurosurgery 2001;48:681-7.
47. Sol JC, Casaux J, Roux FE, et al. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain: Correlations between pain relief and functional imaging studies. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2001;77:172-6.
48. Turner JA, Lee JS, Schandler SL, Cohen MJ. An fMRI investigation of hand representation in paraplegic humans. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17:37-47.
49. Chen AC. New perspectives in EEG/MEG brain mapping and PET/fMRI neuroimaging of human pain. Int J Psychophysiol 2001;42:147-59.
50. Cho ZH, Oleson TD, Alimi D, Niemtzow RC. Acupuncture: The search for biologic evidence with functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography techniques. J Altern Complement Med 2002;8:399-401.
51. Derbyshire SW, Jones AK, Devani P, et al. Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1166-72.
52. Iadarola MJ, Max MB, Berman KF, et al. Unilateral decrease in thalamic activity observed with positron emission tomography in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Pain 1995;63:55-64.
53. Jones AK, Kitchen ND, Watabe H, et al. Measurement of changes in opioid receptor binding in vivo during trigeminal neuralgic pain using [11C]diprenorphine and positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:803-8.
54. Laurent B, Peyron R, Garcia LL, Mauguiere F. Positron emission tomography to study central pain integration. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2000;156:341-51.
55. Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Gregoire MC, et al. Parietal and cingulate processes in central pain. A combined positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of an unusual case. Pain 2000;84:77-87.
56. Cutrer FM, O'Donnell A, Sanchez del RM. Functional neuroimaging: Enhanced understanding of migraine pathophysiology. Neurology 2000;55:S36-45.
57. Howland EW, Wakai RT, Mjaanes BA, Balog JP, Cleeland CS. Whole head mapping of magnetic fields following painful electric finger shock. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1995;2:165-72.
58. Lin YY, Forss N. Functional characterization of human second somatosensory cortex by magnetoencephalography. Behav Brain Res 2002;135:141-5.
59. Loose R, Schnitzler A, Sarkar S, et al. Cortical activation during oesophageal stimulation: A neuromagnetic study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1999;11:163-71.
60. Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Hoshiyama M, Kaneoke Y. Pain processing traced by magnetoencephalography in the human brain. Brain Topogr 1998;10:255-64.
61. Wiech K, Preissl H, Birbaumer N. Neuroimaging of chronic pain: Phantom limb and musculoskeletal pain. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 2000;113:13-8.
62. Yamasaki H, Kakigi R, Watanabe S, Hoshiyama M. Effects of distraction on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following painful electrical stimulation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2000;9:165-75.
63. Mailis-Gagnon A, Giannoylis I, Downar J, et al. Altered central somatosensory processing in chronic pain patients with "hysterical" anesthesia. Neurology 2003;60:1501-7.
64. Wright RG. An emotion-based approach to freedom of speech. Loyola Univ Chicago Law J 2003;34:429.
65. Derbyshire SWG, Whalley MG, Stenger AV, Oakley DA. Cerebral activation during hypnotically induced and imagined pain. Neuroimage 2004;23:392.