Health-related quality of life after hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies of renal cell carcinoma

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 23-27

  Jiang, Jianping ^a   Zheng, Xiangyi ^a   Qin, Jie ^a   Zheng, Mingzhi ^a   Mao, Qiqi ^a   Zhang, Zhigen ^a   Cai, Songliang ^a   Xie, Liping ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Hand assisted laparoscopic; Quality of life; Renal cell carcinoma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; WORK RESUMPTION;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 62349133395     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9429-5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297-301
2. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278-282
3. Nakada SY, Moon TD, Gist M et al (1997) Use of the pneumo sleeve as an adjunct in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urology 49:612-613. doi: 10.1016/ S0090-4295(97)80003-9
4. Tanaka M, Tokuda N, Naito S (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Aktuel Urol 34:267-269. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41614
5. Busby E, Das S, Rao Tunuguntla HS et al (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 91:341-344. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04089.x
6. Lee SE, Ku JH, Kwak C et al (2003) Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison with open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 170:756-759. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080537.28752.aa
7. Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y (2003) Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalization. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:259-263. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.259
8. Kawauchi A, Yoneda K, Fujito A et al (2007) Oncologic outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 69:53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.009
9. Lind MY, Liem YS, Bemelman WA et al (2003) Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: Does the operative technique matter? Surg Endosc 17(4):591-595. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9118-x
10. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J et al (1992) International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res 1:349-351. doi: 10.1007/ BF00434949
11. Harano M, Eto M, Nakamura M et al (2007) A pilot study of the assessment of the quality of life, functional results, and complications in patients with an ileal neobladder for invasive bladder cancer. Int J Urol 14:112-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01701.x
12. Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV, Vingerhoets AJ et al (2006) Long-term quality of life among Dutch prostate cancer survivors: Results of a population-based study. Cancer 107:2186-2196. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22231
13. Patel A, Wilson L, Blick C et al (2005) Health-related quality of life after retroperitoneoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol 19:849-852. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.849
14. Clark PE, Schover LR, Uzzo RG et al (2001) Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: Impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue. Urology 57:252-256. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00927-4
15. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Vries R et al (2003) Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: Comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery. Urology 62:814-820. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00687-3
16. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Veenstra M et al (2007) Quality of life after randomization to laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: long-term follow-up. Transplantation 84:64-69. doi: 10.1097/01.tp. 0000268071.63977.42