A classification of the weighting schemes in reference point procedures for multiobjective programming

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 544-553

  Ruiz, F ^a   Luque, M ^a   Cabello, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DECISION MAKING; ITERATIVE METHODS;

DECISION MAKERS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING PROBLEM; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; OPERATIONAL RESEARCH; REFERENCE POINTS; REFERENCE VALUES; SCALARIZING FUNCTION; WEIGHTING SCHEME;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 62349133374     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602577     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Buchanan J (1997). A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: The GUESS method. J Opl Res Soc 48: 202-206.
2. Buchanan J and Gardiner L (2003). A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming. Eur J Opl Res 149: 17-34.
3. Ehrgott M and Tenfelde-Podehl D (2003). Computation of ideal and nadir values and implications for their use in MCDM methods. Eur J Opl Res 151: 119-139.
4. Kettani O, Aouni B and Martel JM (2004). The double role of the weight factor in the goal programming model. Comput Opns Res 31: 1833-1845.
5. Luque M, Miettinen K, Eskelinen P and Ruiz F (2008). Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization. Omega Int J Mngt, Sci, available online, doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.06.001.
6. Miettinen K (1999). Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.
7. Miettinen K and Mäkelä MM (1999). Comparative evaluation of some interactive reference point-based methods for multi-objective optimisation. J Opl Res Soc 50: 949-959.
8. Miettinen K and Mäkelä MM (2002). On scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization. OR Spectrum 24: 193-213.
9. Miettinen K and Mäkelä MM (2006). Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization. Eur J Opl Res 170: 909-922.
10. Nakayama H and Sawaragi Y (1984). Satisficing trade-off method for multiobjective programming. In: Grauer M and Wierzbicki AP (eds). Interactive Decision Analysis. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, pp 113-122.
11. Osyczka A (1984). Multicriterion Optimization in Engineering with FORTRAN Programs. Ellis Horwood Limited: Chichester.
12. Romero C, Tamiz M and Jones D (1998). Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: Linkages and utility interpretations. J Opl Res Soc 49: 986-991.
13. Sawaragi Y, Nakayama H and Tanino T (1985). Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Academic Press: Orlando.
14. Steuer RE (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
15. Weistroffer HR (1983). An interactive goal programming method for non-linear multiple-criteria decision-making problems. Comput Opns Res 10: 311-320.
16. Wierzbicki AP (1977). Basic properties of scalarizing functionals for multiobjective optimization. Optimization 8: 55-60.
17. Wierzbicki AP (1980). The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In: Fandel G and Gal T (eds). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Theory and Applications. Springer- Verlag: Berlin, pp 468-486.
18. Wierzbicki AP (1986). On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spectrum 8: 73-87.
19. Wierzbicki AP, Makowski M andWessels J (eds) (2000). Model-Based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications.
20. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.