On scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization

OR Spectrum

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 193-213

  Miettinen, Kaisa ^a   Mäkelä, Marko M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Classification; Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM); Nonlinear optimization; Reference point; Scalarizing function

Indexed keywords

EID: 19044393966     PISSN: 01716468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-001-0092-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aksoy Y, Butler TW, Minor III ED (1996) Comparative studies in interactive multiple objective mathematical programming. European Journal of Operational Research 89: 408-422
2. Benayoun R, de Montgolfier J, Tergny J, Laritchev O (1971) Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (STEM). Mathematical Programming 1: 366-375
3. Buchanan J, Gardiner L (2001) A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming. Research Report Series 2001-03, The University of Waikato
4. Buchanan JT (1997) A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: The GUESS method. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48: 202-206
5. Buchanan JT, Daellenbach HG (1987) A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models. European Journal of Operational Research 29: 353-359
6. Caballero R, Rey L, Ruiz F (1996) Determination of satisfying and efficient solutions in convex multi-objective programming. Optimization 37: 125-137
7. Geoffrion AM (1968) Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 22: 618-630
8. Granat J, Makowski M (2000) Interactive specification and analysis of aspiration-based preferences. European Journal of Operational Research 122: 469-485
9. Gulati TR, Islam MA (1990) Efficiency and proper efficiency in nonlinear vector maximum problems. European Journal of Operational Research 44: 373-382
10. Hwang C-L, Masud ASM (1979) Multiple objective decision making - methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
11. Korhonen P, Laakso J (1986) Solving generalized goal programming problems using a visual interactive approach. European Journal of Operational Research 26: 355-363
12. Larichev OI, Polyakov OA, Nikiforov AO (1987) Multicriterion linear programming problems. Journal of Economic Psychology 8: 389-407
13. Lewandowski A, Kreglewski T, Rogowski T, Wierzbicki AP (1989) Decision support systems of DIDAS family (dynamic interactive decision analysis & support). In: Lewandowski A, Wierzbicki AP (eds) Aspiration based decision support systems: Theory, software and applications, pp 21-47. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
14. Mäkelä MM, Neittaanmäki P (1992) Nonsmooth optimization: Analysis and algorithms with applications to optimal control. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
15. Masud ASM, Zheng X (1989) An algorithm for multiple-objective non-linear programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society 40: 895-906
16. Michalowski W, Szapiro T (1992) A bi-reference procedure for interactive multiple criteria programming. Operations Research 40: 247-258
17. Miettinen K (1999) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer, Boston
18. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (1995) Interactive bundle-based method for nondifferentiable multiobjective optimization: NIMBUS. Optimization 34: 231-246
19. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (1999) Comparative evaluation of some interactive reference point-based methods for multi-objective optimisation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 50: 949-959
20. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2000) Interactive multiobjective optimization system WWW-NIMBUS on the Internet. Computers & Operations Research 27: 709-723
21. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2001) Classification and reference point based scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization. Reports of the Department of Mathematical Information Technology, Series B. Scientific Computing B8/2001, University of Jyväskylä
22. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM, Männikkö T (1998) Optimal control of continuous casting by nondifferentiable multiobjective optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications 11: 177-194
23. Mote J, Olson DL, Venkataramanan MA (1988) A comparative multiobjective programming study. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 10: 719-729
24. Nakayama H (1995) Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-objective programming and its applications. In: Pardalos PM, Siskos Y, Zopounidis C (eds) Advances in multicriteria analysis, pp 147-174. Kluwer, Dordrecht
25. Nakayama H, Sawaragi Y (1984) Satisficing trade-off method for multiobjective programming. In: Grauer M, Wierzbicki AP (eds) Interactive decision analysis, pp 113-122. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
26. Narula SC, Kirilov L, Vassilev V (1994) An interactive algorithm for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. In: Tzeng GH, Wand HF, Wen UP, Yu PL (eds) Multiple criteria decision making - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking and Application, pp 119-127. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
27. Narula SC, Weistroffer HR (1989) A flexible method for nonlinear multicriteria decisionmaking problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19: 883-887
28. Olson DL (1992) Review of empirical studies in multiobjective mathematical programming: Subject reflection of nonlinear utility and learning. Decision Sciences 23: 1-20
29. Osyczka A (1984) Multicriterion Optimization in engineering with FORTRAN Programs. Ellis Horwood, Chichester
30. Osyczka A (1992) Computer aided multicriterion optimization system (CAMOS): software package in FORTRAN. International Software Publishers, Krakow
31. Osyczka A, Kundu S (1995) A new method to solve generalized multicriteria optimization problems using the simple genetic algorithm. Structural Optimization 10: 94-99
32. Reeves GR, Gonzalez JJ (1989) A comparison of two interactive MCDM procedures. European Journal of Operational Research 41: 203-209
33. Sakawa M, Mori N (1984) Interactive multiobjective decisionmaking for nonconvex problems based on the penalty scalarizing functions. European Journal of Operational Research 17: 320-330
34. Sawaragi Y, Nakayama H, Tanino T (1985) Theory of multiobjective optimization. Academic Press, Orlando, FL
35. Shin WS, Ravindran A (1991) Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I -continuous case. Computers & Operations Research 18: 97-114
36. Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and applications. Wiley, New York
37. Steuer RE (1989) The Tchebycheff procedure of interactive multiple objective programming. In: Karpak B, Zionts S (eds) Multiple criteria decision making and risk analysis using microcomputers, pp 235-249. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
38. Vanderpooten D, Vincke P (1989) Description and analysis of some representative interactive multicriteria procedures. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 12: 1221-1238
39. Vassileva M (2000) Scalarizing problems of multiobjective linear integer programming. Problems of Engineering Cybernetics and Robotics 50: 54-64
40. Vicini A, Quagliarella D (2001) A multiobjective mathematical test problem, 2001. Available on the Internet at http://ingenet.ulpgc.es/functional/ databases/ceani/
41. Wallenius J (1975) Comparative evaluation of some interactive approaches to multicriterion optimization. Management Science 21: 1387-1396
42. Wierzbicki AP (1980) The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In: Fandel G, Gal T (eds) Multiple criteria decision making theory and applications, pp 468-486. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
43. Wierzbicki AP (1982) A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making. Mathematical Modelling 3: 391-405
44. Wierzbicki AP (1986) On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spektrum 8: 73-87
45. Wierzbicki AP (1999) Reference point approaches. In: Gal T, Stewart TJ, Hanne T (eds) Multicriteria decision making: Advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications, ch 9, pp 1-39. Kluwer, Boston