Toward combining autonomy and interactivity for social robots

AI and Society

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 35-49

  Mohammad, Yasser ^a   Nishida, Toyoaki ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; HUMANOID ROBOT; LEVEL OF AUTONOMIES; PROPOSED ARCHITECTURES; RESEARCH EFFORTS; ROBOTIC ARCHITECTURES; SIMULATED AGENTS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; ARCHITECTURE; ROBOTICS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 62349116891     PISSN: 09515666     EISSN: 14355655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-009-0196-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Argyle M (2001) Bodily communication. Routledge, London
2. Birdwhistell RL (1970) Kinesics and context. University of Philadelphia Press, Philadelphia
3. Blumberg BM (1997) Old tricks, new dogs: Ethology and interactive creatures. PhD thesis. MIT, Cambridge
4. Brooks RA (1991) Challenges for complete creature architectures. In: Meyer JA, Wilson SW (eds) From animals to animats. MIT, Cambridge, pp 434-443
5. Buchsbaum D (2004) Imitation and social learning for synthetic characters. PhD thesis. MIT, Cambridge
6. Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (2004) Founding autonomy: The dialectics between (social) environment and agent's architecture and powers. Lect Notes Artif Intell 2969:40-54
7. Condon WS, Ogston WD (1966) Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. J Nerv Ment Dis 143:338-347
8. Davies M, Stone T (1995) Mental simulation. Blackwell, Oxford
9. Ishiguro H et al (1999) A robot architecture based on situated modules. In: IEEE/RSJ Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol 3, pp 1617-1624
10. Kendon A (1970) Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples considered. Acta Pyschol 32:1-25
11. Lee C (1999) Robust radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 29(6):674-685
12. McDowall JJ (1978) Interactional synchrony: A reappraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol 36:963-975
13. Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2006) Interactive perception for amplification of intended behavior in complex noisy environments. In: International workshop of Social Intelligence Design 2006 (SID2006), Osaka, pp 173-187
14. Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2007) Intention through interaction: Towards mutual intention in human-robot interactions. In: IEA/AIE 2007 conference, Kyoto, pp 114-124
15. Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2008) Two layers action integration for HRI: action integration with attention focusing for interactive robots. Accepted for ICINCO 2008, Maderia
16. Mohammad Y et al (2007) Embodiment of knowledge into the interaction and physical domains using robots. In: ICCAS 2007, Seoul, pp 737-744
17. Murata A et al (1997) Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 78:2226-2230
18. Oberman LM et al (2007) EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward and analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70:2194-2203
19. Perez MC (2003) A proposal for a behavior-based control architecture with reinforcement learning for an autonomous underwater robot. PhD thesis. University of Girona, Girona
20. Sabbagh MA (2004) Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: Implications for autism. Brain Cogn 55:209-219
21. Vogt P (2002) The physical symbol grounding problem. Cogn Syst Res 3:429-457
22. Ziemke T (1999) Does representation need reality. In: Rethinking grounding. Plenum, New York, pp 177-190