System dynamics urban sustainability model for Puerto Aura in Puebla, Mexico

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 77-99

  Duran Encalada, Jorge A ^a   Paucar Caceres, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS AMÉRICAS PUEBLA   (Mexico)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental assessment methods; Multi methodology; Simulation; Sustainable development; System dynamics; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 62249208765     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-008-9114-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. D Alexander R Tomalty 2002 Smart growth and sustainable development: challenges, solutions and policy directions Local Environ 7 397 409 No. 4
2. LE Alfeld 1995 Urban dynamics-the first fifty years Syst Dyn Rev 11 3 199 217
3. Business Partner Consulting, BPC (2005) Works on the Puerto Aura Project, Mimeo, Puebla
4. Cavana RY, Ford A (2004) Environmental and resource systems: Editors' introduction. Syst Dyn Rev 20(2):89-98
5. Checkland PB (1981, 1999) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, New York
6. Deakin M, Curwell S, Lombardi P (2002) Sustainable urban development: the framework and directory of assessment methods. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 4(2):171-197
7. Department of Environment (1993) Environmental appraisal of development plan: a good practice guide. HMSO, London
8. T Dietz PC Stern 1998 Science, values, and biodiversity Bioscience 48 6 441 445
9. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) http://europa.eu.int/comm/ environment/eia
10. EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2000). Projecting land-use change: a summary of models for assessing the effects of community growth and change on land-use patterns. EPA/600/R-00/098 US Environmental Protecting Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinati, OH. http://www.epa.gov/ ecocommunity/tools/reportfinal13.pdf
11. Financial Evaluation of Sustainable Communities (FESC) http://research.scpm.salford.ac.uk/bqtoolkit/tkpages/ass-meth/methods/amfesc-4. html )
12. Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MT, USA
13. R Gregory 2000 Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions Environment 42 5 34 44
14. EO Hale 1993 Successful public involvement J Environ Health 55 4 17 19
15. A Hamilton G Mitchell S Yli-Karjanmaa 2002 The BEQUEST toolkit: a decision support system for urban sustainability Build Res Inf 30 2 109 115
16. ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) (2002) A local Government handbook: accelerating community sustainability in the 21st century. ICLEI, US Office, Berkeley, CA
17. Jackson M (1997) Pluralism is systems thinking and practice. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology. Wiley, New York
18. M Jackson 1999 Towards coherent pluralism in management science J Oper Res Soc 50 12 22
19. N Kohle 2002 The relevance of BEQUEST: an observer's perspective Build Res Inf 30 2 130 138
20. Lane D (2000) Should systems dynamics be described as 'hard' or 'deterministic' systems approach? Sys Res Behav Sci 17(1)
21. D Lane 2001 Rerum cognoscere causas: Part 1-how do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate Syst Dyn Rev 17 2 97 118
22. D Lane 2001 Rerum cognoscere causas: Part II-opportunities generated by the agency/structure debate and suggestions for clarifying the social theoretic position of system dynamics Syst Dyn Rev 17 4 293 309
23. Lautso K, Toivanen S (1999) SPARTACUS system for analysing urban sustainability. Transportation Research Record, No. 1670, pp 35-46
24. Lautso K, Spiekermann K, Weneger M, Sheppard I, Steadman S, Martino A, Domingo R, Gayda S (2004) PROPOLIS, planning and research of policies for land use and transport for increasing urban sustainability. Final Report, Second Edition, European Commission, Helsinki, February, 2004
25. Lichfield N (1996) Community impact evaluation. UCL, Press, London
26. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the club of rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York
27. Mingers J (1997a) Multi-paradigm Multimethodology. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology. Wiley, New York
28. Mingers J (1997b) Towards critical pluralism. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology. Wiley, New York
29. J Mingers J Brocklesby 1996 Multimethodology: towards a framework for critical pluralism Systemist 18 3 101 132
30. A Quaid 2002 The Sustainability inventory: a tool to assist U.S. Municipalities advance towards sustainability Local Environ 7 4 447 452
31. MJ Radzicki DA Seville 1993 An institutional dynamics model of sterling, Massachusetts: indicative planning at the local level J Econ Issues XXVII 2 481 492
32. Sachs W, Loske R, Linz M et al (1998) Greening the North: a post-industrial blueprint for ecology and equality. Zed Books, London
33. Saeed K, Radzicki M (1998) Sustainable development. A special issue of System Dynamics Review. Progressive Publishers, Lahore
34. Sanders P, Sanders F (2004) Spatial urban dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2004 international system dynamics conference, Oxford, UK
35. J Springael PL Kunsch JP Brans 2002 A multiciteria-based system dynamics modeling of traffic congestion caused by urban commuters CEJORS 10 81 97
36. Stave KA (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. Syst Dyn Rev 18(2):139-167
37. Sterman JD (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin-Mcgraw-Hill
38. Sterman J (2002) The global citizen. A special issue of System Dynamics Review. Wiley Publishers, New York
39. H Tregoning A Julian S Christine 2002 Sprawl, smart growth and sustainability Local Environ 7 4 341 347
40. WCED (World Commision on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York
41. Wegener M (1983) Description of the dormund region model. Working Paper 8, Dortmund Institut fur Raumplanung
42. Wegener M (1985) The Dortmunt housing market model: a Monte Carlo simulation of a regional housing market. In: Stahl K (ed) Microeconomics models of housing markets. Lectures notes in economics and mathematical systems 239. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 144-191
43. M Wegener 1994 Operational urban models: state of the art J Am Plan Assoc 60 17 29
44. Wegener M (1995) Current and future land use models. In: Shunk GA, Bass PL, Weatherby CA, Engelke LJ (eds) Travel model improvement program land use modelling conference proceedings, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, pp 13-40
45. 2 emissions of transport by reorganization of urban activities. In: Hayashi Y, Roy J (eds) Land use, transport and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 103-124
46. Wegener M (1998a) Applied models of urban land use, transport and environment: state-of-the-art and future developments. In: Lundqvist L, Mattsson LG, Kim TJ (eds) Network infrastructure and the urban environment: recent advances in land-use/transportation modelling. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 245-267
47. Wegener M (1998b) The IRPUD model: overview, http://irpud.raumplaung.uni. dortmend.de/irpud/pro/mod/mod-e.htm
48. Wegener M (1999) Die Stadt der kursen Wege-mussen wir unsere Stadte umbauen? Berichte aus dem Insitut fur Raumplaung 43. Dortmund: Institut fur Raumplanung, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/eia
49. Wegener M (2003) Overview of land-use transport models. In: Hensher DA, Button K (eds) Transport geography and spatial systems, handbooks in transport, vol. 5. Pergamon Press/Elsevier Science, Oxford