Eminent domain: A review of the issues

Journal of Real Estate Literature

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-43

  Saginor, Jesse ^a   McDonald, John F ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62249156307     PISSN: 09277544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Blume, L. and D. Rubinfeld. Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis. California Law Review, 1984, 72, 569-624.
2. Blume, L., D. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro. The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, 100, 1-92.
3. Buchanan, J. and Y. Yoon. Symmetrie Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons. Journal of Law and Economics, 2000, 43, 1-13.
4. Calabresi, G. and A.D. Melamed. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 1972, 85, 1089-1128.
5. Chalmers, J.A. and D. Sorrells. Supporting Appropriate Adjustments in Large-Scale Condemnation Actions. The Appraisal Journal, 1994, 62, 558-71.
6. Clauretie, T., W. Kuhn, and R.K. Schwer. Residential Properties Taken Under Eminent Domain: Do Government Appraisers Track Market Values? Journal of Real Estate Research, 2004, 26, 319-27.
7. Coase, R. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3, 1-44.
8. Colwell, P. What I Think I Have Learned About Urban Land Markets. Illinois Real Estate Utter, 1999, 13:2, 1-3.
9. Cooter, R. The Coase Theorem. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds.), Allocation, Information, and Markets. New York: Norton, 1989, 64-70.
10. Costonis, J. The Accommodation Power and Fair Compensation: Alternatives to the Takings Impasse in Land-Use Governance. The Appraisal Journal, 1976, 44, 547-55.
11. Eckart, W. On the Land Assembly Problem. Journal of Urban Economics, 1985, 18, 364-78.
12. Epstein, R. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1985.
13. Evans, A. The Land Market and Government Intervention. In P. Cheshire and E. Mills (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 3. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1999.
14. Fischel, W Regulatory Takings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
15. Fischel, W and P. Shapiro. Takings, Insurance, and Michelman: Comments on Economic Interpretations of 'Just Compensation' Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 1988, 17, 269-93.
16. Frankel, A. Property Rights and Eminent Domain. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987.
17. Guidry, K. and Q. Do. Eminent Domain and Just Compensation for Single-Family Homes. Appraisal Journal, 1998, 231-35.
18. Hallberg, M.C. and B.L. Flinchbaugh. Analysis of Factors Associated with Property Holder's Decision in Eminent Domain Proceedings. Research Publication Number 57. Happy Valley, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 1968.
19. Harju, M. and T.M. Clauretie. New Directions in Eminent Domain: The Emerging Issue of Enhancement. The Appraisal Journal, 1984, 52, 214-29.
20. Hayek, F. A. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
21. Heller, M. Tragedy of the Anti-commons. Harvard Law Review, 111, 1998, 621-88.
22. -. Gridlock Economy. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2008.
23. Heller, M. and R. Hills. Land Assembly Districts. Harvard Law Review, 2008, 121, 1465-1527.
24. Institute for Justice. Public Power, Private Gain. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Justice, 2002.
25. McDonald, J.F. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Local Land Use Allocation Decisions. Journal of Regional Science, 2001, 41, 277-99.
26. -. What is Public Use? Eminent Domain and the Kelo Decision. Cornell Real Estate Review, 2006, 5, 1-17.
27. McGough, B.C. Eminent Domain Practices: Their Effect on Acquisition. The Appraisal Journal, 1965, 33, 203-10.
28. McMillen, D.P. and J. McDonald. Land Values in a Newly Zoned City. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, 84, 62-72.
29. Michelman, F. Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of 'Just Compensation' Law. Harvard Law Review, 1967, 80, 1165-1258.
30. Munch, P. An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain. Journal of Political Economy, 1976, 84, 473-97.
31. Neutze, M. The Supply of Land for a Particular Use. Urban Studies, 1987, 24, 379-88.
32. Peterson, A. The Takings Clause: In Search of Underlying Principles Part II. California Law Review, 1990, 78, 53-162.
33. Roberts, T. Valuation of Project Enhancement in Eminent Domain. The Appraisal Journal, 1982, 50, 220-8.
34. Rose-Ackerman, S. Rethinking the Progressive Agenda: The Reform of the American Regulatory State. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1992.
35. Rothenberg, J. Economic Evaluation of Urban Renewal. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1967.
36. Salassi, M. and J. Breaux. Comparison of Valuation Methods for Perennial Sugarcane Crops Associated with Eminent Domain Land Acquisition. The Appraisal Journal, 2001, 69, 44-51.
37. Sax, J. Takings, Private Property and Public Rights. The Yale Law Journal, 1971, 81, 149-86.
38. Strange, W. Information, Holdouts, and Land Assembly. Journal of Urban Economics, 1995, 38, 317-32.
39. Weicher, J. The Fiscal Profitability of Urban Renewal under Matching Grants and Revenue Sharing. Journal of Urban Economics, 1976, 3, 193-208.