Residential properties taken under eminent domain: Do government appraisers track market values?

Journal of Real Estate Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 317-327

  Clauretie, Terrence M ^a   Kuhn, William ^a   Schwer, R Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444231349     PISSN: 08965803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cho, M., House Price Dynamics: A Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Issues, Journal of Housing Research, 1996, 7:2, 145-72.
2. Follain, J. R. and E. Jimenez, Estimating the Demand for Housing Characteristics: A Survey and Critique, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1985, 15, 77-107.
3. Kain, J. F. and J. M. Quigley, Measuring the Value of Housing Quality, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970, 65, 532-48.
4. King, A. T., Property Taxes, Amenities, and Residential Land Values, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1973.
5. Kowalski, J. G. and P. Colwell. Market versus Assessed Value of Industrial Land, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 1986, 14:2, 361-73.
6. Linneman, P., Some Empirical Results on the Nature of Hedonic Price Functions for Urban Housing Markets, Journal of Urban Economics, 1980, 8, 47-68.
7. Miller, N. G., Residential Property Hedonic Pricing Models, In Research in Real Estate, C. F. Sirmans (Ed.), Second edition, JAI Press, 1982.
8. Rosen, S., Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, Journal of Political Economy, 1974, January/February, 34-55.
9. Tiao, G. C. and A. Goldberger, Testing Equality of Individual Regression Coefficients, WEBH Paper 6201, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Social Services Research Institute, 1962.