Spatial interactions between two species of frogs: Rana okaloosae and R. clamitans clamitans

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 1, 2009, Pages 138-141

  Gorman, Thomas A ^a   Bishop, David C ^a,b   Haas, Carola A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Low Country Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; CONSPECIFIC; ENDEMIC SPECIES; FROG; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; OKALOOSA COUNTY; UNITED STATES;

ANURA; RANA OKALOOSAE;

EID: 62249110174     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CE-07-258     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Austin, J. D., S. C. Lougheed, P. E. Moler, and P. T. Boag. 2003. Phylogenetics, zoogeography, and the role of dispersal and vicariance in the evolution of the Rana catesbeiana (Anura: Ranidae) species group. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80:601-624.
2. Bishop, D. C. 2005. Ecology and distribution of the Florida bog frog and flatwoods salamander on Eglin Air Force Base. Unpubl. Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
3. Carpenter, F. L., and R. E. MacMillen. 1976. Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 104:639-642.
4. Clark, P. J., and F. C. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445-453.
5. Dole, J. W. 1965. Summer movements of adult leopard frogs, Rana pipiens Schreber, in northern Michigan. Ecology 46:236-255.
6. Doncaster, C. P. 1990. Non-parametric estimates of interaction from radio-tracking data. Journal of Theoretical Biology 143:431-443.
7. Dyson, M. L., and N. I. Passmore. 1992. Inter-male spacing and aggression in African painted reed frogs, Hyperolius marmoratus. Ethology 91:237-247.
8. Gerhardt, H. C., and J. J. Schwartz. 1995. Interspecific interactions in anuran courtship, p. 603-632. In: Amphibian Biology, Volume 2: Social Behavior. H. Heatwole and B. K. Sullivan (eds.). Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia.
9. Given, M. F. 1988. Territoriality and aggressive interactions of male carpenter frogs, Rana virgatipes. Copeia 1988:411-421.
10. German, T. A., J. D. Erb, B. R. McMillan, and D. J. Martin. 2006. Space use and sociality of river otters (Lontra canadensis) in Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy 87:740-747.
11. Halliday, T., and M. Tejedo. 1995. Intrasexual selection and alternative mating behavior, p. 419-468. In: Amphibian Biology, Vol. 2: Social Behavior. H. Heatwole and B. K. Sullivan (eds.). Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia.
12. Harrison, D. J., and J. R. Gilbert. 1985. Denning ecology and movements of coyotes in Maine during pup rearing. Journal of Mammalogy 66:712-719.
13. Kernohan, B. J., R. A. Gitzen, and J. J. Millspaugh. 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements, p. 125-166. In: Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
14. Littlejohn, M. J. 1977. Long-range acoustic communication in anurans: an integrated and evolutionary approach, p. 263-294. In: The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians. D. H. Taylor and S. I. Guttman (eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
15. Martof, B. 1953a. Territoriality in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Ecology 34:165-174.
16. Martof, B. 1953b. Home range and movements of the green frog, Rana clamitans. Ecology 34:529-543.
17. Moler, P. E. 1985. A new species of frog (Ranidae: Rana) from northwestern Florida. Copeia 1985:379-383.
18. Moler, P. E. 1993. Rana okaloosae Moler Florida bog frog. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 561:1-3.
19. Morris, D. W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136:1-13.
20. Phillips, D. M., D. J. Harrison, and D. C. Payer. 1998. Seasonal changes in home-range area and fidelity of martens. Journal of Mammalogy 79:180-190.
21. Powell, R. A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators, p. 65-110. In: Research Techniques in Animal Ecology. L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller (eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
22. Shepard, D. B. 2002. Spatial relationships of male green frogs (Rana clamitans) throughout the activity season. American Midland Naturalist 148:394-400.
23. Shepard, D. B. 2004. Seasonal differences in aggression and site tenacity in male green frogs, (Rana clamitans). Copeia 2004:159-164.
24. Wells, K. D. 1977. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour 25:666-693.
25. Whitney, C. L., and J. R. Krebs. 1975. Spacing and calling in Pacific tree frogs, Hyla regilla. Canadian Journal of Zoology 53:1519-1527.
26. Wilczynski, W., and E. A. Brenowitz. 1988. Acoustic cues mediate inter-male spacing in a neotropical frog. Animal Behavior 36:1054-1063.
27. Young, J. K., and J. A. Shivik. 2005. What carnivore biologists can learn from bugs, birds, and beavers: a review of spatial theories. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84:1703-1711.
28. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Third edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.