Ultrasound-induced modifications of cytoskeletal components in osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 286-294

  Hauser, Joerg ^a   Hauser, Manfred ^b   Muhr, Gert ^a   Esenwein, Stefan ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone stimulation; Cytoskeletal changes; Fracture healing; In vitro study; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

F ACTIN; GAMMA TUBULIN; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; PHALLOIDIN; RHODAMINE PHALLOIDINE; TUBULIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ACTIN;

ACETYLATION; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL DIVISION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; GROWTH RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MICROTUBULE; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS FIBER; ULTRASOUND; CELL PROLIFERATION; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN PROCESSING; TUMOR CELL LINE; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

ACTINS; CELL COUNT; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOSKELETON; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE, INDIRECT; HUMANS; OSTEOBLASTS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; TUBULIN; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 62249096991     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20741     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lindner AS, Winkelhaus S, Hauser M. 1992. Acoustic imaging of the mitotic spindle in dividing XTH 2-cells. Acoust Imag 19:523-528.
2. Naruse K, Miyauchi A, Itoman M, et al. 2003. Distinct anabolic response of osteoblast to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Miner Res 18:360-369.
3. Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. 1994. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg 76-A:26-34.
4. Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. 1997. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A. multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg 79-A:961-973.
5. Chan CW, Qin L, Lee KW, et al. 2006. Dose-dependent effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus formation during rapid distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res 24:2072-2079.
6. Esenwein SA, Dudda M, Pommer A, et al. 2004. Wirksamkeit von niederenergetischem, gepulstem Ultraschall im Fall des drohenden Regeneratversagens bei der Kallusdistraktion - klinische Behandlungsergebnisse. Zentralbl Chir 129:413-420.
7. Dudda M, Pommer A, Muhr G, et al. 2005. Anwendung von niederenergetischem gepulstem Ultraschall bei der Kallusdistraktion am Humerus - ein Fallbeispiel. Unfallchirurg 108:69-74.
8. Edmonds PD, Ross P. 1988. Protein synthesis by neuroblastoma cells is enhanced by exposure to burst-mode ultrasound cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:219-223.
9. Raz D, Zaretsky U, Einav S, et al. 2005. Cellular alterations in cultured endothelial cells exposed to therapeutic ultrasound irradiation. Endothelium 12:201-213.
10. Mortimer AJ, Dyson M. 1988. The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on calcium uptake in fibroblasts. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:499-506.
11. Zhou S, Schmelz A, Seufferlein T, et al. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in human skin fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 279:54463-54469.
12. Meazzini MC, Toma CD, Schaffer JL, et al. 1998. Osteoblast cytoskeletal modulation in response to mechanical strain in vitro. J Orthop Res 16:170-180.
13. Hrazdira I, Skorpikova J, Dolnikova M. 1998. Ultrasonically induced alterations of cultured tumour cells. Eur J Ultrasound 8:43-49.
14. Luduena RF. 1998. Multiple forms of tubulin: different gene products and covalent modifications. Int Rev Cytol 178:207-275.
15. Fogh J, Trempe G. 1975. New human tumor cell lines. In: Fogh J, editor. Human tumor cells in vitro. New York: Plenum Press, p 115-159.
16. Reher P, el Elbeshir NI, Harvey W, et al. 1997. The stimulation of bone formation in vitro by therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:1251-1258.
17. Korstjens CM, Nolte PA, Burger EH, et al. 2004. Stimulation of bone cell differentiation by low-intensity ultrasound - a histomorphometric in vitro study. J Orthop Res 22:495-500.
18. Clark PR, Hill CR. 1969. Biological action of ultrasound in relation to the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res 38:443-444.
19. Alter A, Rozenszajn LA, Miller HI, et al. 1998. Ultrasound inhibits the adhesion and migration of smooth muscle cells in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:711-721.
20. Young SR, Dyson M. 1990. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on the healing of full-thickness excised skin lesions. Ultrasonics 28:175-180.
21. Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA. 1996. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:1131-1154.
22. Parvizi J, Wu CC, Lewallen DG, et al. 1999. Low-intensity ultrasound stimulates proteoglycan synthesis in rat chondrocytes by increasing aggrecan gene expression. J Orthop Res 17:488-494.
23. Zhang ZJ, Huckle J, Francomano CA, et al. 2003. The effects of pulsed low-intensity ultrasound on chondrocyte viability, proliferation, gene expression and matrix production. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1645-1651.
24. Roovers K, Assoian RK. 2003. Effects of rho kinase and actin stress fibers on sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity and activation of G(1) phase cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol Cell Biol 23:4283-4294.
25. Adler J, Necas O, Hradzira I. 1993. Disassembly of microtubules due to low intensity ultrasound. Folia Biol (Praha) 39:55-57.
26. Soltys BJ, Borisy GG. 1985. Polymerization of tubulin in vivo: direct evidence for assembly onto microtubule ends and from centrosomes. J Cell Biol 100:1682-1689.
27. Webster DR, Gundersen GG, Bulinski JC, et al. 1987. Assembly and turnover of detyrosinated tubulin in vivo. J Cell Biol 105:265-276.
28. Webster DR, Borisy GG. 1989. Microtubules are acetylated in domains that turn over slowly. J Cell Sci 92:57-65.
29. Cassimeris L. 2002. The oncoprotein 18/stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14:18-24.
30. Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Brugerolle G, Viscogliosi E. 1996. Tubulin post-translational modifications in the primitive protist Trichomonas vaginalis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 33:288-297.
31. Weber K, Schneider A, Müller N, et al. 1996. Polyglycylation of tubulin in the diplomonad Giardia lamblia, one of the oldest eukaryotes. FEBS Lett 393:27-30.
32. Bobinnec Y, Khodjakov A, Mir LM, et al. 1998. Centriole disassembly in vivo and its effect on centrosome structure and function in vertebrate cells. J Cell Biol 143:1575-1589.
33. Bobinnec Y, Moudjou M, Fouquet JP, et al. 1998. Glutamylation of centriole and cytoplasmic tubulin in proliferating non-neuronal cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 39:223-232.
34. Wolff A, de Néchaud B, Chillet D, et al. 1992. Distribution of glutamylated alpha and beta-tubulin in mouse tissues using a specific monoclonal antibody, GT335. Eur J Cell Biol 59:425-432.
35. Kierszenbaum AL. 2002. Sperm axoneme: a tale of tubulin posttranslation diversity. Mol Reprod Dev 62:1-3.
36. Gagnon C, White W, Cosson J, et al. 1996. The polyglutamylated lateral chain of alpha-tubulin plays a key role on flagellar motility. J Cell Sci 109:1545-1553.
37. Million K, Larcher JC, Laoukili J, et al. 1999. Polyglutamylation and polyglycylation of alpha- and beta-tubulins during in vitro ciliated cell differentiation of human respiratory epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 112:4357-4366.
38. Inclan YF, Nogales E. 2001. Structural models for the self-assembly and microtubule interactions of gamma-, delta- and epsilon-tubulin. J Cell Sci 114:413-422.
39. Regnard C, Audebert S, Desbruyères E, et al. 1998. Tubulin polyglutamylase: partial purification and enzymatic properties. Biochemistry 37:8395-8404.
40. Hill GE, Fenwick S, Matthews BJ, et al. 2005. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on repair of epithelial cell monolayers in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 31:1701-1706.