Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: A questionnaire survey

Implementation Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Van Helvoort Postulart, Debby ^a   Van Der Weijden, Trudy ^b   Dellaert, Benedict Gc ^c   De Kok, Mascha ^a   Von Meyenfeldt, Maarten F ^a   Dirksen, Carmen D ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62149132080     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-10     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Twenty years of implementation research. R Grol R Jones, Fam Pract 2000 17 S32 S35 10.1093/fampra/17.suppl-1.S32 10735266
2. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. R Grol, Med Care 2001 39 II-46 II-54 10.1097/00005650-200108002-00003
3. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. R Grol J Grimshaw, Lancet 2003 362 1225 1230 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1 14568747
4. R Grol M Wensing M Eccles, Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice Oxford: Elsevier 2005
5. Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis. M Bosch T van der Weijden M Wensing R Grol, J Eval Clin Pract 2007 13 161 168 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00660.x 17378860
6. Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada. BP Will JM Berthelot C Le Petit EM Tomiak S Verma WK Evans, Eur J Cancer 2000 36 724 735 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00340-8 10762744
7. Breast cancer surgery in ambulatory setting: blessing or curse. C Frotscher G Beets M Hebly CD Dirksen A Kessels M Bemelmans M Marcus M Meyenfeldt von
8. Discrete choice experiments for complex health care decisions: does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? D van Helvoort-Postulart BGC Dellaert T van der Weijden MF von Meyenfeldt CD Dirksen, Health Econ 2008 18973148
9. JJ Louviere DA Hensher JD Swait, Stated choice methods: analysis and application Cambridge University Press 2000
10. Conjoint analysis: a guide for designing and interpreting conjoint studies. American Marketing Association, Market Research Division, Marketing Research Techniques Series 1992
11. Hierarchical information integration: a new method for the design and analysis of complex multiattribute judgment problems. JJ Louviere, Adv Consum Res 1984 11 148 155
12. Modeling hierarchical conjoint processes with integrated choice experiments. H Oppewal JJ Louviere HJP Timmermans, J Marketing Res 1994 31 92 105 10.2307/3151949
13. Measuring perceived service quality using integrated conjoint experiments. H Oppewal M Vriens, International Journal of Bank Marketing 2000 18 154 169 10.1108/02652320010349049
14. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. J Sitzia N Wood, Int J Qual Health C 1998 10 311 317 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311
15. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. DA Asch MK Jedrziewski NA Christakis, J Clin Epidemiol 1997 50 1129 1136 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1 9368521
16. Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principle-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship. A Scott S Vick, Scott J Polit Econ 1999 46 111 134 10.1111/1467-9485.00124
17. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. M Ryan, Soc Sci Med 1999 48 535 546 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00374-8 10075178
18. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? D Braithwaite J Emery S de Lusignan S Sutton, Fam Pract 2003 20 545 551 10.1093/fampra/cmg509 14507796
19. E-mail versus Web survey response rates among health education professionals. SL Brown MJ Kittleson, AJHS 2005 20
20. An online survey of chiropractors' opinions of continuing education. KJ Stuber JP Grod DL Smith P Powers, Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2005 13 22 16242035 10.1186/1746-1340-13-22
21. Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments: a randomized trial. J Coast TN Flynn C Salisbury J Louviere TJ Peters, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2006 5 249 260 10.2165/00148365-200605040-00006