Metastasis versus focal eosinophilic infiltration of the liver in patients with extrahepatic abdominal cancer: An evaluation with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 119-124

  Park, Mi Suk ^a   Kim, Myeong Jin ^a,b   Lim, Joon Suk ^a   Kim, Seung Hyung ^c   Kim, Hua Sun ^a   Chung, Yong Eun ^a   Kim, Ki Whang ^a  

^a Research Institute of Radiological Science   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Jeju International University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Contrast; Liver inflammation; Liver neoplasm; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

MAGNETISM; PATHOLOGY; RESONANCE;

CONTRAST; DYNAMIC PHASE; HEPATOBILIARY; LIVER INFLAMMATION; LIVER NEOPLASMS; PERFORMANCE; PHASE IMAGE; PHASE IMAGING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; SIGNAL INTENSITIES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GADOBENIC ACID; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ABDOMINAL CANCER; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CELL INFILTRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON CANCER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DRUG INFUSION; EOSINOPHIL; EOSINOPHIL COUNT; EOSINOPHILIA; FEMALE; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFUSION SYSTEM; LIVER METASTASIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECTUM CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STOMACH CANCER; ABDOMINAL TUMOR; EVALUATION; LIVER TUMOR; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ABDOMINAL NEOPLASMS; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EOSINOPHILIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 62149127039     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181641b1a     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hur J, Park MS, Yu JS, et al. Focal eosinophilic necrosis versus metastasis in the liver: the usefulness of two-phase dynamic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1085-1090.
2. Jang HJ, Lee WJ, Lee SJ, et al. Focal eosinophilic necrosis of the liver in patients with underlying gastric or colorectal cancer: CT differentiation from metastasis. Korean J Radiol. 2002;3:240-244.
3. Sun JS, Kim JK, Won JH, et al. MR findings in eosinophilic infiltration of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:191-194.
4. Tsuda K, Maeda T, Tominaga A, et al. Eosinophil-induced liver injury: an experimental model using IL-5 transgenic mice. J Hepatol. 2001;34:270-277.
5. Yoo SY, Han JK, Kim YH, et al. Focal eosinophilic infiltration in the liver: radiologic findings and clinical course. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:326-332.
6. Yu JS, Yoon SW, Park MS, et al. Eosinophilic hepatic necrosis: magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography comparison. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:765-771.
7. Grazioli L, Morana G, Caudana R, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and pathologic findings. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:25-34.
8. Kirchin MA, Pirovano GP, Spinazzi A. Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). An overview. Invest Radiol. 1998;33:798-809.
9. Manfredi R, Maresca G, Baron RL, et al. Delayed MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma enhanced by gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:704-710.
10. Pena CS, Saini S, Baron RL, et al. Detection of malignant primary hepatic neoplasms with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) enhanced T1-weighted hepatocyte phase MR imaging: results of off-site blinded review in a phase-II multicenter trial. Korean J Radiol. 2001;2:210-215.
11. Petersein J, Spinazzi A, Giovagnoni A, et al. Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging - a multicenter phase III clinical study. Radiology. 2000;215:727-736.
12. Pirovano G, Vanzulli A, Marti-Bonmati L, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine - enhanced MR imaging in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1111-1120.
13. Spinazzi A, Pirovano G, Ratcliffe G, et al. Multicenter testing of gadobenate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver disease. Acad Radiol. 1996;3(Suppl 2):S415-S416.
14. Kim YK, Lee JM, Kim CS. Gadobenate dimeglumine - enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:5-13.
15. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Delayed MR imaging of the liver: correlation of delayed enhancement of hepatic tumors and pathologic appearance. Abdom Imaging. 1998;23:309-313.
16. Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, et al. Imaging liver metastases: review and update. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:217-228.
17. Muramatsu Y, Takayasu K, Moriyama N, et al. Peripheral low-density area of hepatic tumors: CT-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1986;160:49-52.
18. Terayama N, Matsui O, Ueda K, et al. Peritumoral rim enhancement of liver metastasis: hemodynamics observed on single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography and histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:975-980.