Delayed MR imaging of the liver: Correlation of delayed enhancement of hepatic tumors and pathologic appearance

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 309-313

  Gabata, T ^a   Matsui, O ^a   Kadoya, M ^a   Yoshikawa, J ^a   Ueda, K ^a   Kawamori, Y ^a   Takashima, T ^a   Nonomura, A ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contrast enhancement; Delayed imaging; Liver; Magnetic resonance (MR); Neoplasm

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER TUMOR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR; CELL DIVISION; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031900269     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900347     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, et al. CT of hepatic masses: significance of prolonged and delayed enhancement. AJR 1986; 146:729-733
2. Muramatsu Y, Takayasu K, Moriyama N, et al. Peripheral low density areas of hepatic tumors: CT-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1986;160:49-52
3. Takayasu K, Ikeya S, Mukai K, et al. CT of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: late contrast enhancement in six patients. AJR 1990; 154:1203-1206
4. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Delayed enhancement of fibrotic areas in hepatic masses: CT-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:206-211
5. Yamashita Y, Fan ZM, Yamamoto H, et al. Sclerosing hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic findings. Abdom Imaging 1993;18:347-351
6. Bechtold RE, Karstaedt N, Wolfman NT, et al. Prolonged hepatic enhancement on computed tomography in a case of hepatic lymphoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:186-189
7. Miller WJ, Dodd GD, Federle MP, et al. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: imaging findings with pathologic correlation. AJR 1992;159:53-57
8. Hamrick-Turner J, Abbitt PL, Ros PR. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MR appearance. AJR 1992;158:77-79
9. Fan ZM, Yamashita Y, Harada M, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1993;161:313-317
10. Beer BV, Roche A, Mathieu D, et al. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: MR and CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:420-424
11. Mahfouz AE, Hamm B, Wolf KJ. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions. Radiology 1994;190:49-52
12. Weinmann HJ, Brash RC, Press WR, et al. Characteristics of Gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. AJR 1984;142:625-630
13. Kormano M, Dean PB. Extravascular contrast material: the major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology 1976;121:379-382
14. Becker J, Gregoire A, Berdon W, et al. Vicarious excretion of urographic media. Radiology 1968;90:243-248
15. Yoshida H, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989;171: 339-342
16. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. Hyperintense hepatocellular carcinoma on gadolinium-enhanced hepatic MRI [Japanese]. J Med Imagings 1992;12:719-720