The evolution of supervision in the federal probation system

Federal Probation

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 15-21

  Alexander, Melissa ^a   VanBenschoten, Scott ^b  

^a Eastern District of Missouri ^*  (United States)

^b Admin Office of the US Courts   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62149106987     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andrews, D.A. & Bonta, J.A. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. Ohio: Anderson Press.
2. Barnoski, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington state's research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
3. Byrne, J. & Taxman, F. (2005). Crime (control) is a choice: Divergent perspectives on the role of treatment in the adult corrections system. Criminology and Public Policy, 4A (A2), 290-309.
4. Dowden, C. & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis. Forum on Corrections Research. 11(2), 21-24.
5. Farley, C. and Hackman, S. (2006). Ready-4Work In Brief: Interim Outcomes are in: recidivism at half the national average. Public/Private Ventures In Brief, 4.
6. Light, P. C. (2005). The four pillars of high performance: How robust organizations achieve extraordinary results. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7. Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E., & Holsinger, A. (2006). Risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 77-93.
8. Lowenkamp, C., Pealer, J., Smith, P. and Latessa, E. (2006). Adhering to the risk and need principles: Does it matter for supervision-based programs? Federal Probation, 70 (3).
9. Miller, W. R. & Mount, K.A. (2001). A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 457-471.
10. National Research Council (2007). Committee on community supervision and desistance from crime, committee on law and justice, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Parole, desistance from crime, and community integration. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
11. National Institute of Corrections (2005). Implementing evidence based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective interventions. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Corrections. Retrieved September 21, 2007 from http://www.lhc.ca.gov/lhcdir/AOD Review/ NationallnstituteofCorrections.pdf
12. National Institute of Justice (2006). Drug Courts: The Second Decade. Special Report: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij. Ncj# 211681.
13. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
14. Rogers, E.M. (1995). The challenge: Lessons for guidelines from the Diffusion of innovations. Journal on Quality Improvement, 21, 324-8.
15. Rubak, S., Sandbaeck, A., Laurizten, T. and Christensen, B. (2005). Motivational Interviewing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. British Journal of General Practice, April.
16. Sachwald, J., Eley, E., & Taxman F. (2006). An ounce of prevention: Proactive supervision reduces violation behavior. Topics in Community Corrections. Community Corrections Division, National Institute of Corrections, 31-38.
17. Taxman, F.S. (2002). Supervision-Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66(2), 14-27.
18. Taxman, F. (2006). Assessment with a flair: Offender accountability in supervision plans. Federal Probation, 70(2), 2-7.
19. Taxman, F., Shepardson, E., & Byrne, J. (2004). Tools of the trade: A guide for incorporating science into practice. Washington, D.C.: Community Corrections Division, National Institute of Corrections.
20. Walters, S.T., Clark, M.D., Gingerich, R., and Meltzer, M.L. (2007). Motivating offenders to change: A guide for probation and parole. National Institute of Corrections.