Reverse engineering the evolution of protein interaction networks

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2009, PSB 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 190-202

  Gibson, Todd A ^a   Goldberg, Debra S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE NETWORKS; GENE TREE; NETWORK EVOLUTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS;

ACTIVE NETWORKS; GENES; PROTEINS; REVERSE ENGINEERING; TOPOLOGY; TREES (MATHEMATICS); YEAST;

BIOLOGY;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; STATISTICS;

BIOMETRY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FUNGAL PROTEINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 61949109355     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Uetz P, et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403:623-627. (Pubitemid 30103994)
2. Ito T, et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4569-4574. (Pubitemid 32295017)
3. Gavin A C, et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415:141-147.
4. Gavin A C, et al. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440:631-636.
5. Krogan N J, et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440:637-643.
6. Reguly T, et al. (2006) Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bioi 5:11.
7. Sole R V, Pastor-Satorras R, Smith E, Kepler T B (2002) A model of largescale proteome evolution. Advances in Complex Systems 5:43.
8. Vazquez A, Flammini A, Maritan A, Vespignani A (2003) Modeling of protein interaction networks. ComPlexUs 1:38-44.
9. Sharan R, Ideker T (2006) Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat Biotechnol 24:427-433.
10. Pereira-Leal J, Levy E, Kamp C, Teichmann S (2007) Evolution of protein complexes by duplication of homomeric interactions. Genome Bioi 8:R51.
11. Pereira-Leal J B, Levy E D, Teichmann S A (2006) The origins and evolution of functional modules: lessons from protein complexes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Bioi Sci 361:507-517. (Pubitemid 44870107)
12. Pereira-Leal J B, Teichmann S A (2005) Novel specificities emerge by stepwise duplication of functional modules. Genome Res 15:552-559. (Pubitemid 41057817)
13. Presser A, Elowitz M B, Kellis M, Kishony R (2008) The evolutionary dynamics of the saccharomyces cerevisiae protein interaction network after duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:950-954. (Pubitemid 351282062)
14. Veron A S, Kaufmann K, Bomberg-Bauer E (2007) Evidence of interaction network evolution by whole-genome duplications: A case study in mads-box proteins. Mol Bioi Evol 24:670-678. (Pubitemid 46355793)
15. Pinney J W, Amoutzias G D, Rattray M, Robertson D L (2007) Reconstruction of ancestral protein interaction networks for the bzip transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20449-20453.
16. Ohno S (1970) Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, New York).
17. Force A, et al. (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545. (Pubitemid 29177561)
18. Gibson T, Goldberg D (2008) Questioning the ubiquity of neofunctionalization. PLoS Computation Biology. In Revision.
19. Wagner A (2001) The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol Biol Evol18:1283-1292. (Pubitemid 32660673)
20. He X, Zhang J (2005) Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169:1157-1164. (Pubitemid 40404340)
21. Batada N N, et al. (2007) Still stratus not altocumulus: further evidence against the date/party hub distinction. PLoS Biol 5:e154.
22. Tarassov K, et al. (2008) An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320:1465-1470. (Pubitemid 351929421)
23. Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A (2007) Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature 449:54-61. (Pubitemid 47373776)
24. Kellis M, Birren B W, Lander E S (2004) Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428:617-624. (Pubitemid 38524797)
25. Hormozdiari F, Berenbrink P, Przulj N, Sahinalp S C (2007) Not all scalefree networks are born equal: The role of the seed graph in PPI network evolution. PLoS Comput Biol 3:e118.
26. Goldberg D S, Roth F P (2003) Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Pmc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4372-4376. (Pubitemid 36457736)
27. Yook S H, Oltvai Z N, Barabasi A L (2004) Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Pmteomics 4:928-942. (Pubitemid 38445953)
28. Han J D J, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick M E, Vidal M (2005) Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 23:839-844. (Pubitemid 43093127)
29. Yu H, et al. (2004) Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res 14:1107-1118. (Pubitemid 38811547)
30. von Mering C, et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417:399-403. (Pubitemid 34563526)