Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: Part I. qualitative gap analysis of current military and international aid programs

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 230-236

  Reaves, Erik J ^a   Schor, Kenneth W ^a   Burkle, Frederick M ^b  

^a UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civil military coordination; Disaster evaluation and monitoring; Humanitarian assistance; Measures of effectiveness; Military medical missions; Stability operations

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISASTER; DISASTER PLANNING; EVIDENCE BASED EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HEALTH; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; METHODOLOGY; MILITARY MEDICINE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RELIEF WORK; SOLDIER; UNITED STATES;

ALTRUISM; DISASTER PLANNING; DISASTERS; EVIDENCE-BASED EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MEDICAL MISSIONS, OFFICIAL; MILITARY MEDICINE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RELIEF WORK; UNITED STATES; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 61849163406     PISSN: 19357893     EISSN: 193844X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818d3c80     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Joint Publication 4-102 Health Services Support. Chairman for the Joint Chief of Staff. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new-pubs/jp4-02.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2006.
2. Office of The Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS). State Department Web site. http://www.state.gov/s/crs. Accessed November 4, 2006.
3. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. http:// www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/nss2006.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2006.
4. United States Department of Defense Directive 3000.05 Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations. http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300005p.pdf. Accessed October 10, 2006.
5. Fields G, Gold T, Keane J, et al. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force Institutionalizing Stability Operations in the Department of Defense. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2005-09-Stability-Final.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2006.
6. Bonventre G. Health Capabilities in Stability Operations. US Joint Forces Command Office of the Command Surgeon. US Dept of Defense. Unpublished.
7. MacMillan DS. Model describing the effect of employment of the United States military in a complex emergency. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20:282-289.
8. Natsios AS. The nine principles of reconstruction and development. Parameters. 2005;Autumn:4-20.
9. Drifmeyer J, Llewellyn C. Overview of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs. Mil Med. 2003;168:975-980.
10. Drifmeyer J, Llewellyn C. Toward more effective humanitarian assistance. Mil Med. 2004;169:161-168.
11. Brennan R, Nandy R. Complex humanitarian emergencies: a major global health challenge. Emerg Med. 2001;13:147-156.
12. Salama P, Spiegel P, Talley L, et al. Lessons learned from complex emergencies over past decade. Lancet. 2004;364:1801-1813.
13. Burkle FM. Lessons learned and future expectations of complex emergencies. BMJ. 1999;172:33-38.
14. Burkle FM. Complex humanitarian emergencies: a review of epidemiological and response models. J Postgrad Med. 2006;2:110-115.
15. Connolly M Gayer M, Ryan M, et al. Communicable diseases in complex emergencies: impact and challenges. Lancet. 2004;364:1974-1983.
16. Young H, Borrell A, Holland D, et al. Public nutrition in complex emergencies. Lancet. 2004;365:1899-1909.
17. Checchi F, Roberts L. Interpreting and Using Mortality Data in Humanitarian Emergencies: A Primer for Non-epidemiologists. Humanitarian Policy Group Network Paper. No.5. 2005. http://www.odihpn. org/documents/ networkpaper052.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2007.
18. Woodruff B. Interpreting mortality data in humanitarian emergencies. Lancet. 2006;367:9-10.
19. Spiegel P, Burkle FM, Dey C, et al. Developing public health indicators in complex emergency response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2001;16:281-285.
20. Salama P, Buzard N, Spiegel P. Improving standards in international humanitarian response: the SPHERE Project and beyond. JAMA. 2001; 286:531-532.
21. Wilson D, ed. Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response. Cowley, UK: Sphere Project/Oxfam GB; 2004.
22. Measuring Mortality, Nutritional Status, and Food Security in Crisis Situations: SMART Methodology. http://www.smartindicators.org/SMART-Protocol-01- 27-05.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2007.
23. United Nations Millennium Declaration: Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). United Nations-Official Records of the Secretary Council. http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2007.
24. Beitler AL, Junnila JL, Meyer JHJ. Humanitarian assistance in Afghanistan: a prospective evaluation of clinical effectiveness. Mil Med. 2006; 171:889-893.
25. Air Force Center for Knowledge Sharing Lessons Learned. https://afkm. wpafb.af.mil. Accessed March 11, 2007.
26. Army Medical Lessons Learned. https://secure-ll.amedd.army.mil. Accessed March 15, 2007.
27. Marine Corps Center for Lessons Learned (MCCLL). https://www. mccll.usmc.mil. Accessed March 15, 2007.
28. Naval Operational Medical Lesson Learned Center (NOMLLC). https:// www.mccll.usmc.mil/nomi. Accessed March 17, 2007.
29. Joint Center for Operational Analysis-Lessons Learned (JCOA-LL). http://www.jfcom.mil/search.htm. Accessed March 18, 2007.
30. Center for Army Lessons Learned. http://call.army.mil/links/lessons.asp. Accessed March 11, 2007.
31. Regional Core Health Data Initiative; Indicators Glossary. Pan American Health Organization, Health Analysis and Statistics Unit (HA). http://www.paho.org/English/SHA/glossary.htm. Accessed May 5, 2007.
32. Hofmann CA, Roberts L, Shoham J, et al. Measuring the Impact of Humanitarian Aid: A Review of Current Practice. Humanitarian Policy Group Research Briefing Web site. http://www.odi.org.uk/hpg/papers/ hpgbrief15.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2006.
33. Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results-Based Management. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Development Assistance Committee. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/21/2754804.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2006.
34. Evaluating Humanitarian Action Using the OECD-DAC Criteria. ALNAP Overseas Development Institute Web site. http://www.odi.org.uk/alnap/ publications/eha-dac/pdfs/eha-2006.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2006.
35. Guidance on Evaluation and Review for DFID Staff. Department For International Development Web site. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/aboutdfid/ performance/files/guidance-evaluation.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2006.
36. Kusek JZ, Rist RC. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System. The World Bank Web site. http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/23/27/35281194. pdf. Accessed December 10, 2006.
37. Kellogg WK. Logic Model Development Guide. W.K. Kellogg Foundation Web site. http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2006.
38. Smallwood G. International Humanitarian and Health Strategy. Senior Health Policy Advisor. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (AOSD). Unpublished, 2007.
39. Konoske P, Negus T. Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Operations T-AH. San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center; 2007.
40. Unprecedented Terror Free Tomorrow Polls: World's Largest Muslim Countries Welcome US Navy, New Results from Indonesia and Bangladesh. Terror Free Tomorrow Web site. http://www.terrorfreetomorrow. org/upimagestft/ Final%20Mercy%20Poll%20Report.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2006.