Biomedical scientists' perceptions of ethical and social implications: Is there a role for research ethics consultation?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  McCormick, Jennifer B ^a,c   Boyce, Angie M ^a,d   Cho, Mildred K ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CONSULTATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLITICS; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL ASPECT; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; AWARENESS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PILOT STUDY;

AWARENESS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FOCUS GROUPS; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 61849148348     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004659     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Neal HA, Smith TL, McCormick JB (2008) Beyond Sputnik: Science Policy in the 21st Century. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, See chapter 20.
2. Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation governing science. Minerva 41: 223-244.
3. Beckwith J, Huang F (2005) Should we make a fuss? A case for social responsibility in science. Nat Biotechnol 23: 1479-1480.
4. Dubochet J (2003) Teaching scientists to be citizens. EMBO Rep 4: 330-332.
5. Rotblat J (1999) Science and humanity in the twenty-first century. Available: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles/rotblat/ index.html via the Internet. Accessed 8 July 2008.
6. Pilcher H (2006) Bioethics: Dial 'e' for ethics. Nature 440: 1104-1105.
7. de Melo-Marti'n I, Palmer LI, Fins JJ (2007) Developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research. Acad Med 82: 900-904.
8. Cho MK, Tobin SL, Greely HT, McCormick JB, Boyce A, et al. (2008) Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation. Am J Bioeth 8: 4-13.
9. Cho MK, Tobin SL, Greely HT, McCormick JB, Boyce A, et al. (2008) Research ethics consultation: The Stanford experience. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 30: 1-6.
10. Brown S, Kalichman MW (1998) Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Sci Eng Ethics 4: 487-498.
11. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R (2005) Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435: 737-738.
12. De Vries R, Anderson MS, Martinson BC (2006) Normal misbehavior: scientists talk about the ethics of research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 1: 43-50.
13. Nicholas B (1999) Molecular geneticists and moral responsibility: "maybe if we were working on the atom bomb I would have a different argument". Sci Eng Ethics 5: 515-30.
14. Kempner J, Perlis CS, Merz JF (2005) Forbidden knowledge. Science 307: 854.
15. Pinch T (1990) The culture of scientists and disciplinary rhetoric. European Journal of Education 25: 295-304.
16. Conefrey T (1997) Gender, culture, and authority in a university life sciences laboratory. Discourse and Society 8: 313-340.
17. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
18. Sankar P, Cho MK, Wolpe PR, Schairer C (2006) What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigma. Genet Med 8: 33-42.