Friction in related-party trade when a rival is also a customer

Management Science

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1850-1860

  Arya, Anil ^a   Mittendorf, Brian ^b   Yoon, Dae Hee ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decentralization; Supply chains; Transfer pricing

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; MARGINAL COSTS; SILVER LININGS; TRANSFER PRICES; TRANSFER PRICING; WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS;

COSTS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MANUFACTURE; SILVER; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

SALES;

EID: 61849129644     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0906     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alles, M., S. Datar. 1998. Strategic transfer pricing. Management Sci. 44 451-461.
2. Baldenius, T., S. Reichelstein. 2006. External and internal pricing in multidivisional firms. J. Accounting Res. 44 1-28.
3. Caillaud, B., P. Rey. 1994. Strategic aspects of vertical delegation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 39 421-432.
4. Durst, M. 2002. Management vs. tax accounting in intercompany transfer pricing. Tax Management Transfer Pricing Rep. 10 909-915.
5. Dutta, S., M. Bergen, J. Heide, G. John. 1995. Understanding dual distribution: The case of reps and house accounts. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 11 189-204.
6. Edlin, A., S. Reichelstein. 1996. Holdups, standard breach remedies, and optimal investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86 478-501.
7. Ernst & Young. 2003. Transfer pricing 2003 global survey. http://www.ey.com.
8. Fershtman, C., K. Judd. 1987. Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77 927-940.
9. Gallini, N., N. Lutz. 1992. Dual distribution and royalty fees in franchising. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 8 471-501.
10. Goex, R. 2000. Strategic transfer pricing, absorption costing, and observability. Management Accounting Res. 11 327-348.
11. Goex, R., U. Schiller. 2006. An economic perspective on transfer pricing. G Chapman, A. Hopwood, M. Shields, eds. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 2. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
12. Ismail, S. 2004. Parity rules: Mapping regulatory treatment of similar services. Federal Comm. Law J. 56 447-488.
13. Johnson, N. 2006. Divisional performance measurement and transfer pridng for intangible assets. Rev. Accounting Stud. 11 339-365.
14. Kalnins, A. 2004. An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment within franchised and company-owned branded chains. Marketing Sci. 23 476-489.
15. Myerson, R. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Narayanan, V., M. Smith. 2000. Impact of competition and taxes on responsibility center organization and transfer prices. Contemporary Accounting Res. 17 491-529.
17. Reitzes, J., G. Woroch. 2007. Input-quality sabotage and the welfare consequences of parity rules. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.
18. Sappington, D., D. Weisman. 2005. Self-sabotage. J. Regulatory Econom. 27 155-175.
19. Singh, N., X. Vives. 1984. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econom. 15 546-554.
20. Sklivas, S. 1987. The strategic choice of managerial incentives. RAND J. Econom. 18 452-458.
21. Smith, M. 2002. Ex ante and ex post discretion over arm's length transfer prices. Accounting Rev. 77 161-184.
22. Tedeschi, B. 2005. New level of competition: When a supplier gets into its customers' business. New York Times (September 26) C8.
23. Vickers, J. 1985. Delegation and the theory of the firm. Econom. J. 95 138-147.
24. Vinhas, A., E. Anderson. 2005. How potential conflict drives channel structure: Concurrent (direct and indirect) channels. J. Marketing Res. 42 507-515.
25. Yoshida, Y. 2000. Third-degree price discrimination in input markets: Output and welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90 240-246.