Multisensory interactions within and outside the focus of visual spatial attention (Commentary on Fairhall & Macaluso)

European Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1245-1246

  Röder, Brigitte ^a   Büchel, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SENSORY EVALUATION; SPEECH; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 61849112823     PISSN: 0953816X     EISSN: 14609568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06715.x     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Alsius, A., Navarra, J., Campbell, R. Soto-Faraco, S. (2005) Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Curr. Biol., 15, 839 843.
2. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., de Gelder, B. Driver, J. (2000) The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Percept. Psychophys., 62, 321 332.
3. Driver, J. (1996) Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature, 381, 66 68.
4. Driver, J. Noesselt, T. (2008) Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on 'sensory-specific' brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron, 57, 11 23.
5. Ernst, M.O. Bülthoff, H.H. (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci., 8, 162 169.
6. Fairhall, S. Macaluso, E. (2009) Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. Eur. J. Neurosci., 29, 1247 1257.
7. Hein, G., Doehrmann, O., Muller, N.G., Kaiser, J., Muckli, L. Naumer, M.J. (2007) Object familiarity and semantic congruency modulate responses in cortical audiovisual integration areas. J. Neurosci., 27, 7881 7887.
8. Kitagawa, N. Spence, C. (2005) Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect. Exp. Brain Res., 161, 62 71.
9. Senkowski, D., Saint-Amour, D., Gruber, T. Foxe, J.J. (2008) Look who's talking: The deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions. Neuroimage, 43, 379 387.
10. Spence, C. Driver, J. (2000) Attracting attention to the illusory location of a sound: reflexive crossmodal orienting and ventriloquism. Neuroreport, 11, 2057 2061.
11. Stein, B.E. Stanford, T.R. (2008) Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 9, 255 266.
12. Stekelenburg, J.J., Vroomen, J. de Gelder, B. (2004) Illusory sound shifts induced by the ventriloquist illusion evoke the mismatch negativity. Neurosci. Lett., 357, 163 166.
13. Vroomen, J., Bertelson, P. de Gelder, B. (2001a) The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention. Percept. Psychophys., 63, 651 659.
14. Vroomen, J., Bertelson, P. de Gelder, B. (2001b) Directing spatial attention towards the illusory location of a ventriloquized sound. Acta Psychol., 108, 21 33.