Antimicrobial activity of Enterococcus faecium EF 55 against Salmonella Enteritidis in chicks

Acta Veterinaria Hungarica

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 13-24

  Levkut, Mikuláš ^a   Pistl, Juraj ^a   Lauková, Andrea ^a   Revajová, Viera ^a   Herich, Robert ^a   Evčíková, Zuzana ^a   Strompfová, Viola ^b   Szabóová, Renáta ^b   Kokinčáková, Tatiana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Slovakia)

^b INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Chicks; Enterococcus faecium; Probiotics; Salmonella infection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; ARTICLE; BIRD DISEASE; CHICKEN; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FEMALE; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FEMALE; POULTRY DISEASES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL;

AVES; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

EID: 61849103985     PISSN: 02366290     EISSN: 15882705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/AVet.57.2009.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Audisio, M. C., Oliver, G. and Apella, M. C. (2000): Protective effect of e. faecium j96, a potential probiotic strain, on chicks infected with salmonella pullorum. j. food protect. 63, 1333-1337.
2. Avila, L. A. F., Nascimento, V. P., Salle, C. T. P. and Moraes, H. L. S. (2006): Effects of probiotics and maternal vaccination on Salmonella enteritidis infection in broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 50, 608-612.
3. Barrow, P. A., Huggins, M. B., Lowell, M. A. and Simpson, J. M. (1987): Observations on the pathogenesis of experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens. Res. Vet. Sci. 42, 194-199.
4. Bessay, M., Le Vern, Y., Kerboeuf, D., Yvore, P. and Quere, P. (1996): Changes in intestinal intraepithelial and systemic T-cell subpopulations after an Eimeria infection in chickens: comparative study between E. acervulina and E. tenella. Vet. Res. 27, 503-514.
5. Brownell, J. R., Sadler, M. B. and Fanelli, M. J. (1970): Role of ceca in intestinal infection of chickens with Salmonella typhimurium. Avian Dis. 14, 106-116.
6. Boyum, M. A. (1974): Separation of blood leukocytes, granulocytes and lymphocytes. Tissue Antigens 4, 269-274.
7. Chai, J. Y. and Lillehoj, H. S. (1988): Isolation and functional characterization of chicken intestinal intra-epithelial lymphocytes showing natural killer cell activity against tumour target cells. Immunol. 63, 111-117.
8. Chambers, J. R. and Lu, X. (2002): Probiotics and maternal vaccination for Salmonella control in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11, 320-327.
9. Chiu, C. H. and Ou, J. T. (1996): Rapid identification of Salmonella serovars in faeces by specific detection of virulence genes, invA and spvC, by an enrichment broth culture-multiplex PCR combination assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34, 2619-2622.
10. Cigánková, V., Lauková, A., Guba, P. and Nemcová, R. (2004): Effect of enterocin A on the intestinal epithelium of Japanese quails infected by Salmonella duesseldorf. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 48, 25-27.
11. Desmith, M., Ducatelle, R. and Haesebrouck, F. (1998): Immunohistochemical observations in the caeca of chickens infected with Salmonella enteritidis phage type four. Poult. Sci. 77, 73-74.
12. Duchet-Suchaux, M., Lechopier, P., Marly, J., Bernardet, P., Delaunay, R. and Pardon, P. (1995): Quantification of experimental S. enterica serovar Enteritidis carrier-state in B13 leghorn chicks. Avian Dis. 39, 796-803.
13. Durant, J. A., Nisbet, D. J. and Ricke, S. C. (2000): Response of selected poultry cecal probiotic bacteria and a primary poultry Salmonella typhimurium isolate grown with or without glucose in liquid batch culture. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 35, 503-516.
14. Franz, Ch. M. A. P., Van Belkum, M. J., Holzappel, W. H., Abriouel, H. and Gálvez, A. (2007): Diversity of enterococcal bacteriocins and their grouping in a new classification scheme. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 293-310.
15. Fried, K. and Jantošovič, J. (1961): Blood sampling by cardiac puncture (in Slovak). Vet. Čas. 10, 383-391.
16. Herich, R. and Levkut, M. (2002): Lactic acid bacteria, probiotics and immune system. Vet. Med. Czech 47, 169-180.
17. Herich, R., Lauková, A., Strompfová, V., Revajová, V., Levkut, M. and Pistl, J. (2004): Optimalization of Salmonella detection in chickens' caecum using PCR method (short communication). Arch. Tierz. Dummerstorf 47, 85-91.
18. Hoggenmueller, L., Wakenell, P. and Schat, K. (1993): Preparation and characterization of chicken intraepithelial leukocytes. Avian Pathol. 22, 509-523.
19. Hook, M. and Switalski, L. (1992): Microbial Adhesion and Invasion. Springer Verlag, New York.
20. Jones, F. T. and Richardson, K. E. (2004): Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult. Sci. 83, 384-391.
21. Lauková, A., Guba, P., Nemcová, R. and Vasilková, Z. (2003): Reduction of Salmonella in gnotobiotic Japanese quails caused by the enterocin A-producing EK13 strain of Enterococcus faecium. Vet. Res. Commun. 27, 275-280.
22. Marciáková, M., Strompfová, V., Boldiá rová, K., Lauková, A. and Gancarčíková, S. (2004): Effect of potential probiotic activity of Enterococcus faecium EE3 strain against Salmonella infection in Japanese quails. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 48, 387-390.
23. O'Dea, E. E., Fasenko, G. M., Allison, G. E., Korver, D. R., Tannock, G. W. and Guan, L. L. (2006): Investigating the effects of commercial probiotics on broiler chick quality and production efficiency. Poult. Sci. 85, 1855-1863.
24. Popiel, I. P. and Turnbull, C. B. (1995): Passage of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella thompson through the chick ileocaecal mucosa. Infect. Immun. 74, 786-792.
25. Simon, O., Jadamus, A. and Vahjen, W. (2001): Probiotic feed additives - effectiveness and expected modes of action. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10,Suppl. 1, 51-67.
26. Strompfová, V. and Lauková, A. (2007): In vitro study on bacteriocin of enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe 13, 228-237.
27. Strompfová, V., Mudroová, D. and Lauková, A. (2003): Effect of bacteriocin-like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium EF 55 on the composition of avian gastrointestinal microflora. Acta Vet. Brno 72, 559-564.
28. Strompfová, V., Simonová, M., Lauková, A., Marciáková, M. and Vasilková, Z. (2008): Effect of probiotic and bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria towards Eimeria spp. Acta Vet. Hung. (submitted).
29. Svanborg, C. (1994): Bacterial adherence and mucosal immunity. In: Ogra, P. L., Mestecky, J., Lamm, M. E., Strober, W., McGhee, J. R. and Bienestock, J. (eds) Handbook of Mucosal Immunology. Academic Press, San Diego, New York. pp. 71-78.
30. Todd, E. C. D. (1997): Epidemiology of foodborne diseases - a worldwide review. World Health Statistics Quarterly (WHO, Geneva) 50, 30-50.
31. Woodford, N., Egelton, M. C. and Morrison, D. (1997): Comparisons of PCR with phenotypic methods for the speciation of enterococci. In: Horaud, T., Bouvet, A., Leclercq, R., de Montclos, H. and Sicard, M. (eds) Streptococci and the Host. Plenum Press, New York. Vol. 47, pp. 405-409.