The impact of individual factors on healthcare staff's computer use in psychiatric hospitals

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1141-1150

  Koivunen, Marita ^a,b   Välimäki, Maritta ^b,c   Koskinen, Anita ^d   Staggers, Nancy ^e   Katajisto, Jouko ^b  

^a SATAKUNTA CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SOUTHWEST FINLAND   (Finland)

^d TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computers; Information technology; Nurses; Nursing; Psychiatric hospitals

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMAN; MALE; MANPOWER; MENTAL HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; FINLAND; HOSPITALS, PSYCHIATRIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 61849103352     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02119.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Academy of Finland (2003) Ethical Guidance for Research. Available at: http://www.aka.fi/julkaisut (accessed 20 July 2006).
2. Act on Medical Research (1999) Finnish Acts of Parliament. Available at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/1999/19990488 (accessed 13 January 2007).
3. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C Eichstädter R (2003) Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10, 69 84.
4. Argyrous G (1997) Statistics for Social Research. MacMillian, Hampshire.
5. Ball MJ, Hannah KJ Douglas JV (2000) Nursing and informatics. In Nursing Informatics. Where Caring and Technology Meet, 3rd ed Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Newbold SK Douglas JV eds). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 6 14.
6. Bowies K (1997) The barriers and benefits of nursing information systems. Computers in Nursing 15, 191 196.
7. Burkes M (1991) Identifying and relating nurses' attitudes towards computer use. Computers in Nursing 9, 190 201.
8. Burns N Grove SK (2004) The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilization, 5th ed. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.
9. Chambers M (2002) Nursing informatics and practice development. NTresearch 7, 101 115.
10. Chang AM, Chau JPC Holroyd E (1999) Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalence. Journal of Advanced Nursing 29, 316 322.
11. Chastain AR (2002) Are nursing faculty members ready to integrate information technology into the curriculum Nursing Education Perspectives 23, 187 190.
12. Christensen H, Griffiths KM Korten A (2002) Web-based cognitive behavior therapy: analysis of site usage and changes in depression and anxiety scores. Journal of Medical Internet Research 4, e(3).
13. Colley A, Gale M Harris T (1994) Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research 10, 129 137.
14. Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 17 25.
15. Dienemann J Van de Castle B (2003) The impacts of healthcare informatics on the organization. Journal of Nursing Administration 33, 557 562.
16. Dumas JA, Dietz E Connolly PM (2001) Nurse practitioner use of computer technologies in practice. Computers in Nursing 19, 34 40.
17. Estabrooks CA, O'Leary K, Ricker K Humphrey C (2003) The Internet and access to evidence: how are nurses positioned Journal of Advanced Nursing 42, 73 81.
18. ETENE, National Advisory Board on Health Care Ethics (2001) Checklist for Researchers and Members of Ethics Committees. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Sub-committee on Medical Research Ethics, Helsinki.
19. Eysenbach G Köhler C (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal 324, 573 577.
20. Foti ME, Bartels SJ, Merriman MP, Fletcher KE Van Citters AD (2005) Medical advance care planning for persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 56, 576 584.
21. Gerrard L, Grant AM Maclean JR (1999) Factors that may influence the implementation of nurse-centred telemedicine services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 5, 231 236.
22. Gholamreza T Van Dyke T (2002) Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behaviour 479 - 18, 494.
23. Griffiths KM Christensen H (2000) Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal 321, 1511 1515.
24. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P Thorogood M (2006) Why are health care interventions delivered over the Internet? A systematic review of the published literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 8, e10. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2006/2/e10/. (accessed 9 July 2006).
25. Henderson RD Deane FP (1996) User expectations and perceptations of a patient management information system. Computers in Nursing 14, 188 193.
26. Houston TK, Cooper LA, Vu HT, Kahn J, Toser J Ford DE (2001) Screening the public for depression through the Internet. Psychiatric Services 52, 362 367.
27. Hughes RA (2003) Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing 42, 340 346.
28. Jiang W-W, Chen W Chen Y-C (2004) Important computer competencies fort he nursing profession. Journal of Nursing Research 12, 213 225.
29. Jones E (1987) Translation of quantitative measures for use in cross-cultural research. Nursing Research 36, 324 327.
30. Jones J (2003) Patient education and the use of World Wide Web. Clinical Nurse Specialist 17, 281 283.
31. Kirkley D Rewick D (2003) Evaluating clinical information systems. Journal of Nursing Administration 33, 643 651.
32. Koopmans L (1987) An Introduction to Contemporary Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. PWS-Kent Publishers, Boston.
33. Larrabee J, Boldreghini S, Elder-Sorrells K, Turner Z, Wender R, Hart J Lenzi P (2001) Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Computers in Nursing 19, 56 65.
34. Lee T-T, Lee T-Y, Lin K-C Chang P-C (2004) Factors affecting the use of nursing information systems in Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50, 170 178.
35. Liu J, Pothiban L, Lu Z Khamphonsiri T (2000) Computer knowledge, attitudes and skills of nurses in People's Hospital of Beijing Medical University. Computers in Nursing 18, 197 206.
36. Local Finland (2006) Hospital Districts of Finland, Local Finland, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://www.kunnat.net/k-perussivu.asp?path= 1;29;353;553 (accessed 13 January 2007).
37. MacDonald CJ, Stodel EJ Coulson I (2004) Planning an eLearning dementia care program for healthcare teams in long-term care facilities: the learners' perspectives. Educational Gerontology 30, 845 864.
38. Marasovic C, Kenney C Elliott D (1997) Attitudes of Australian nurses toward the implementation of a clinical information system. Computers in Nursing 15, 91 98.
39. Marini SD (2000) Introduction of nursing informatics in the nursing baccalaureate program at the American University of Beirut. Computers in Nursing 18, 240 247.
40. May C, Gask L, Atkinson T, Ellis N, Mair F Esmail A (2001) Resisting and promoting new technologies on clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. Social Science and Medicine 52, 1889 1901.
41. McCannon M O'Neal PV (2003) Results of national survey indicating information technology skills needed by nurses at time of entry into the work force. Journal of Nursing Education 42, 337 340.
42. McLane S (2005) Designing an EMR planning process based on staff attitudes toward and opinions about computers in healthcare. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 23, 85 92.
43. Ministry of Labour, Finland (2003) Summary of the 2020 Working Group Report. Ministry of Labour, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://www.mol.fi/mol/fi/99-pdf/fi/06-tyoministerio/06-julkaisut/06-tutkimus/ tpt245.pdf (accessed 20 July 2006).
44. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland (2003) The Decree of Updating Education of Health Care Staff 1194/2003. Finnish Acts of Parliament, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://www.finlex.fi (accessed 20 July 2006).
45. Monsivais D Reynolds A (2003) Developing and evaluating patient education materials. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 34, 172 176.
46. Moody L, Slocumb E, Berg B Jackson D (2004) Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes and preferences. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22, 337 344.
47. Ngin PM Simms LM (1996) Computer use for work accomplishment. A comparison between nurse managers and staff nurses. Journal of Nursing Administration 26, 47 55.
48. Sachdeva RC (2001) Measuring the impact of new technology: an outcomes-based approach. Critical Care Medicine 29, 190 195.
49. Saranto K, Fieandt N, Klami P, Luostarinen J, Sulonen H Nissilä L (2002) Terveydenhuollon ja varhaiskasvatuksen henkilöstön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan koulutuksen ja työelämän osaamistarpeiden kartoitus. Stakes Aiheita 29/2002. Stakes, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland.
50. Sinclair M Gardner J (2001) Midwives' perceptions of the use of technology in assisting childbirth in Northern Ireland. Journal of Advanced Nursing 36, 229 236.
51. Sleutel M Guinn M (1999) As good as it gets?: going online with a clinical information system. Computers in Nursing 17, 181 185.
52. Staggers N (1994) The Staggers nursing computer experience questionnaire. Applied Nursing Research 7, 97 106.
53. Staggers N Kobus M (2000) Comparing response time, errors and satisfaction between text-based and graphical user interfaces during nursing order tasks. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 7, 164 176.
54. Staggers N Mills ME (1994) Nurse-computer interaction: staff performance outcomes. Nursing Research 43, 144 150.
55. Staggers N, Gassert CA Curran C (2002) A delphi study to determine informatics competencies for nurses at four level of practice. Nursing Research 51, 383 390.
56. Statistics Finland (2005) Finns as Users of Information and Communications Technology. Statistics Finland, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/tie-en.html (accessed 20 July 2006).
57. Tilley S Chambers M (1998) Using technology to enhance psychological well-being. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 5, 423 424.
58. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 425 478.
59. Vroom V (1964) Work and Motivation. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
60. Weber B, Fritze J, Schneider B, Simminger D Maurer K (1998) Computerizer self-assessment in psychiatric in-patients: acceptability, feasibility and influence of computer attitude. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinaciva 98, 140 145.
61. Wickström G, Laine M, Pentti J, Elovainio M Lindström K (2000) Work Conditions and Wellbeing in the Social and Health Care Sector - Changes in the 1990's. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki.
62. Wilbright WA, Haun DE, Romano T, Krutzfeldt T, Fontenot CE Nolan TE (2006) Computer use in an urban university hospital. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 24, 37 43.
63. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2004) Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WMA, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed 13 January 2007).
64. Yang K-F, Shu Y, Lin M-S Hsu C-L (2004) Study of basic computer competence among public health nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research 12, 1 9.
65. Ybarra M Eaton W (2005) Internet-based mental health interventions. Mental Health Services Research 7, 75 87.