User expectations and perceptions of a patient management information system

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 188-193

  Henderson, Ron D ^a   Deane, Frank P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Expectations; Resistance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUSTRALIA; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MEDICAL RECORD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER USER TRAINING; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PERSONNEL, HOSPITAL;

EID: 0030137598     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Knapp RG, Miller MC, Levine J. Experience and attitudes toward computers in medicine of students and clinical faculty members at one school. Journal of Medical Education. 1987;62:344-346.
2. Whiting-O'Keefe QE, Simborg DW, Epstein WV, Warger A. A computerized summary medical record system can provide more information than the standard medical record. JAMA. 1985;254:1185-1192.
3. Friedman RB, Gustafson DH. Computers in clinical medicine: A critical review. Comput Biomed Res. 1977;10:199-204.
4. Jay SJ, Anderson JG. Computerised hospital information systems: Their future role in medicine. JR Soc Medicine. 1982;75:303-305.
5. Kjerulff KH, Pillar B, Mills ME, Lanigan J. Technology anxiety as a potential mediating factor in response to medical technology. J Med Syst. 1992;16:7-13.
6. Mandell SV. Resistance to computerization: An examination of the relationship between resistance and the cognitive style of the clinician. J Med Syst. 1987;11:311-318.
7. Hirschheim R, Newman M. Information systems and user resistance: Theory and practice. The Computer Journal. 1988;31:398-408.
8. Zmud RW. Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Management Science. 1979;25:966-979.
9. Simonson MR, Maurer M, Montag-Torardi M, Whitaker M. Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 1987;3:231-248.
10. Igbaria M, Pavra FN, Huff SL. Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage. Information & Management. 1989;16:187-196.
11. Ives B, Olson MH, Baroudi JJ. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM. 1983;26;785-793.
12. Atkinson RL, Atkinson RC, Smith EE, Bem DJ, Lihgard ER. Introduction to Psychology. 10th ed. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1990.
13. Landy FJ. The Psychology of Work Behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press; 1985.
14. Shneiderman B. Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. Computing Surveys. 1984;16:265-285.
15. Rushinek A, Rushinek SF. What makes users happy? Communications of the ACM. 1986;29:594-598.
16. Dzida W, Herda S, Itzfeldt WD. User-perceived quality of interactive systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 1978;4:270-276.
17. Ginzberg MJ. Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science. 1981;27:459-478.
18. Weaver D, Brickman P. Expectancy, feedback, and disconfirmation as independent factors in outcome satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;30:420-428.
19. Anderson RE. Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research. 1973;10:38-44.
20. Oliver RL. Hedonic reactions to the disconfirmation of product performance expectations: Some moderating conditions. J Appl Psychol. 1976;61:246-250.
21. Locke EA. What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance. 1969;4:309-336.
22. Wanous JP. Organizational entry: From naive expectations to realistic beliefs. J Appl Psychol. 1976;61:22-29.
23. Argote L, Goodman P, Schkade D. The human side of robotics: How workers react to a robot. Sloan Management Review. 1983;24:31-41.
24. Buchanan DA, Boddy D. Advanced technology and the quality of working life: The effects of word processing on video typists. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1982;55:1-11.
25. Oliver RL. Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retail settings. Journal of Retailing. 1981;57:25-46.
26. Tinsley HEA, Bowman SL, Ray SB. Manipulation of expectancies about counselling and psychotherapy: Review and analysis of expectancy manipulation strategies and results. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 1988;35:99-108.
27. Henderson RD, Deane FP, Ward M. Occupational differences in computer related anxiety: Implications for the implementation of a computerised patient management information system. Behaviour & Information Technology. 1995;14:23-31.
28. Jacobson SF, Holder ME, Dearner JF. Computer anxiety among nursing students, educators, staff, and administrators. Comput Nurs. 1989;7:266-272.
29. Reynolds A, Ferrell MJ. Computer literacy: A mission for continuing education for professional nurses. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1989;20:132-135.
30. Wilson AA. Computer anxiety in nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 1991;30:52-56.
31. Ward MJ. A Model of Computer Anxiety Applied to the Implementation of a Computerised Patient Management System. New Zealand: Massey University; 1992. Thesis.
32. SPSS for Windows. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 1993. Ron Henderson is a Lecturer in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, in the Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Canberra, Australia.
33. Frank Deane is a Senior Lecturer in Clinical Psychology, in the Department of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Both authors have an interest in the personal and organizational factors that aid in the acceptance of information technology. The current work was undertaken while the senior author was working as an Information Systems Officer within the Manawatu-Wanganui Area Health Board, New Zealand. Address for correspondence: Ron D. Henderson, PhD, Centre for Applied Psychology, PO Box 1, Belconnen, ACT 2616, Canberra, Australia