메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 3-8

Must research participants understand randomization?

Author keywords

Clinical judgment; Informed consent; Interests; Randomization; Research; Understanding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL; PHARMACOKINETICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

EID: 61649113008     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802654145     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (19)

References (23)
  • 1
    • 33750318968 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An introduction to biostatistics: Randomization, hypothesis testing and sample size
    • San Diego, CA: Academic Press
    • Albert P. S., and Borkowf, C. B. 2002. An introduction to biostatistics: Randomization, hypothesis testing and sample size. In Principles and Practices of Clinical Research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 165-196.
    • (2002) Principles and Practices of Clinical Research , pp. 165-196
    • Albert, P.S.1    Borkowf, C.B.2
  • 3
    • 2342464377 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors
    • Appelbaum, P. S., Lidz, C. W., and Grisso, T. 2004. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 26(2): 1-8.
    • (2004) IRB: Ethics and Human Research , vol.26 , Issue.2 , pp. 1-8
    • Appelbaum, P.S.1    Lidz, C.W.2    Grisso, T.3
  • 4
    • 0035922438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The ethics of placebo-controlled trials - A middle ground
    • Emanuel, E. J., and Miller, F. G. 2001. The ethics of placebo-controlled trials - A middle ground. New England Journal of Medicine 345(12): 915-919.
    • (2001) New England Journal of Medicine , vol.345 , Issue.12 , pp. 915-919
    • Emanuel, E.J.1    Miller, F.G.2
  • 5
    • 0032585195 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspective of participation in a randomized controlled trial
    • Featherstone, K., and Donovan, J. L. 1998. Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspective of participation in a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 317(7167): 1177- 1180.
    • (1998) British Medical Journal , vol.317 , Issue.7167 , pp. 1177-1180
    • Featherstone, K.1    Donovan, J.L.2
  • 6
    • 0036302082 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it? The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial
    • Featherstone, K., and Donovan, J. L. 2002. Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it? The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine 55(5): 709-719.
    • (2002) Social Science and Medicine , vol.55 , Issue.5 , pp. 709-719
    • Featherstone, K.1    Donovan, J.L.2
  • 8
    • 0033816160 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial
    • Hietanen, P., Aro, A. R., Holli, K., and Absetz, P. 2000. Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial. European Journal of Cancer 36(2000): 2096-2104.
    • (2000) European Journal of Cancer , vol.36 , pp. 2096-2104
    • Hietanen, P.1    Aro, A.R.2    Holli, K.3    Absetz, P.4
  • 9
    • 61649094978 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). 1996. Good Clinical Practices. E6 4.8.10. Available at: http://www.ich.org/cache/ compo/276-254-l.html (accessed December 30,2008).
    • International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). 1996. Good Clinical Practices. E6 4.8.10. Available at: http://www.ich.org/cache/ compo/276-254-l.html (accessed December 30,2008).
  • 12
    • 12844261878 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The therapeutic misconception: Problems and solutions
    • Lidz, C. W., and Appelbaum, P. S. 2002. The therapeutic misconception: Problems and solutions. Medical Care 40(9): V55-63.
    • (2002) Medical Care , vol.40 , Issue.9
    • Lidz, C.W.1    Appelbaum, P.S.2
  • 13
    • 11444260689 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The quality of parental consent for a Ugandan malaria study
    • Pace, C, Talisuna, T., Wendler, D. et al. 2005. The quality of parental consent for a Ugandan malaria study. American Journal of Public Health 95(7): 1184-1189.
    • (2005) American Journal of Public Health , vol.95 , Issue.7 , pp. 1184-1189
    • Pace, C.1    Talisuna, T.2    Wendler, D.3
  • 14
    • 0942278952 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: Conceptual framework and structured review
    • Peppercorn, J., Weeks, J. C., Cook, E. E., and Joffe, S. 2004. Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: Conceptual framework and structured review. Lancet 363(9405): 263-270.
    • (2004) Lancet , vol.363 , Issue.9405 , pp. 263-270
    • Peppercorn, J.1    Weeks, J.C.2    Cook, E.E.3    Joffe, S.4
  • 15
    • 0020325090 scopus 로고
    • The ethics of the randomized clinical trial
    • Shafer, A. 1982. The ethics of the randomized clinical trial. New England Journal of Medicine 307: 719-724.
    • (1982) New England Journal of Medicine , vol.307 , pp. 719-724
    • Shafer, A.1
  • 16
    • 4344596053 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology
    • Simon, C. M., Siminoff, S. A., Kodish, E. D., and Burant, C. 2004. Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology 22(13): 2708-2718.
    • (2004) Journal of Clinical Oncology , vol.22 , Issue.13 , pp. 2708-2718
    • Simon, C.M.1    Siminoff, S.A.2    Kodish, E.D.3    Burant, C.4
  • 17
    • 0030839611 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making sense of randomization: Responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial
    • Snowdon, C., Garcia, J., and Elbourne, D. 1997. Making sense of randomization: Responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Social Science and Medicine 45(9): 1337-1355.
    • (1997) Social Science and Medicine , vol.45 , Issue.9 , pp. 1337-1355
    • Snowdon, C.1    Garcia, J.2    Elbourne, D.3
  • 18
    • 0004096809 scopus 로고
    • Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
    • Spilker, B. 1991. Guide to Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 69-73.
    • (1991) Guide to Clinical Trials , pp. 69-73
    • Spilker, B.1
  • 19
    • 0022607567 scopus 로고
    • Informed consent for research. Effects of readability, patient age, and education
    • Taub, H. A., Baker, M. T, and Sturr, J. F. 1986. Informed consent for research. Effects of readability, patient age, and education. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 34(8): 601- 606.
    • (1986) Journal of the American Geriatric Society , vol.34 , Issue.8 , pp. 601-606
    • Taub, H.A.1    Baker, M.T.2    Sturr, J.F.3
  • 20
    • 0021339672 scopus 로고
    • Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer
    • Taylor, K. M., Margolese, R. G., Soskolne, C. L. 1984. Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 310(21): 1363-1367.
    • (1984) New England Journal of Medicine , vol.310 , Issue.21 , pp. 1363-1367
    • Taylor, K.M.1    Margolese, R.G.2    Soskolne, C.L.3
  • 21
    • 61649126496 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS). 1991. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR 46.116.
    • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS). 1991. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR 46.116.
  • 22
    • 61649094509 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States Food and Drug Administration US FDA, 2005. Code of Federal Regulations, 1, revised. Title 21, 50.25
    • United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA). 2005. Code of Federal Regulations, vol. 1, revised. Title 21, 50.25.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.