Understanding randomization: Helpful strategies

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 14-15

  Brody, Howard ^a,b   Childress, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PERSONNEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

COMPREHENSION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 61649093837     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802663245     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Appelbaum, P. S., Lidz, C. W., and Grisso, T. 2004. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 26(2): 18.
2. Featherstone, K., and Donovan, J. L. 2002. Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it? The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomized controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine 55(5): 709-719.
3. Miller, F. G., and Brody, H. 2003. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Center Report 33(3): 19-28.
4. Wendler, D. 2009. Must research participants understand randomization? American Journal of Bioethics 9(2): 3-8.