A new software tool (VA-BATTS) to calculate bending, axial, torsional and transverse shear stresses within bone cross sections having inhomogeneous material properties

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 463-476

  Kourtis, Lampros C ^a,b   Carter, Dennis R ^a,b   Kesari, Haneesh ^c   Beaupre, Gary S ^a,b  

^a VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mechanical properties; Bone stress calculation; Finite element analysis; Inhomogeneous material properties; Torsional shear; Transverse shear

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANISOTROPY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 61549134491     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255840801930728     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barber, JR (1992) Elasticity pp. 223-246. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (The Netherlands)
2. Boyd, SK and Muller, R. (2006) Smooth surface meshing for automated finite element model generation from 3D image data. J Biomech 39, pp. 1287-1295.
3. Brianza, SZ, Delise, M., Maddalena Ferraris, M, D'Amelio, P. and Botti, P. (2006) Cross-sectional geometrical properties of distal radius and ulna in large, medium and toy breed dogs. J Biomech 39, pp. 302-311.
4. Carpenter, RD, Beaupre, GS, Lang, TF, Orwoll, ES and Carter, DR (2005) New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res 20, pp. 1533-1542.
5. Carter, DR and Hayes, WC (1976) Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 194, pp. 1174-1176.
6. Carter, DR and Hayes, WC (1977) The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59, pp. 954-962.
7. Castleman, KR (1995) Digital image processing 2nd ed, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ)
8. Cheng, X., Li, J., Lu, Y., Keyak, J. and Lang, T. (2007) Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with hip fracture. Bone 40, pp. 169-174.
9. Cody, DD, Gross, GJ, Hou, FJ, Spencer, HJ, Goldstein, SA and Fyhrie, DP (1999) Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32, pp. 1013-1020.
10. Guldberg, RE, Hollister, SJ and Charras, GT (1998) The accuracy of digital image-based finite element models. J Biomech Eng 120, pp. 289-295.
11. Hong, J., Cabe, GD, Tedrow, JR, Hipp, JA and Snyder, BD (2004) Failure of trabecular bone with simulated lytic defects can be predicted non-invasively by structural analysis. J Orthop Res 22, pp. 479-486.
12. Jacobs, CR, Mandell, JA and Beaupre, GS (1993) A comparative study of automatic finite element mesh generation techniques in orthopaedic biomechanics. In: Langrana NA, Friedman MH, Grood ES, editors. Proceedings of the 1993 Bioengineering Conference. New York(NY): ASME Press pp. S12-S14.
13. Keller, TS (1994) Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech 27, pp. 1159-1168.
14. Keller, TS, Mao, Z. and Spengler, DM (1990) Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone. J Orthop Res 8, pp. 592-603.
15. Keyak, JH (2001) Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys 23, pp. 165-173.
16. Keyak, JH and Falkinstein, Y. (2003) Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 25, pp. 781-787.
17. Keyak, JH and Rossi, SA (2000) Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories. J Biomech 33, pp. 209-214.
18. Klever, FJ, Klumpert, R., Horenberg, J., Grotenboer, HJ, Campen, DHv and Pauly, T. Perren, SM and Schneider, E. (eds) (1984) Global mechanical properties of trabecular bone: experimental determination and prediction from structural model. Biomechanics: current interdisciplinary research: selected Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the European society of biomechanics, in collaboration with the European society of biomaterials Dordrecht Martinus Nijhoff, Boston (MA) - Hingham (MA), USA
19. Kopperdahl, DL and Keaveny, TM (1998) Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech 31, pp. 601-608.
20. Kopperdahl, DL, Morgan, EF and Keaveny, TM (2002) Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 20, pp. 801-805.
21. Koseki, M., Kitagawa, Y., Inou, N. and Maki, K. (2004) A correction method of CT values influenced by partial volume effect (imaging and measurement). Proceedings of the Asian Pacific conference on biomechanics: emerging science and technology in biomechanics 2004, pp. 119-120. - Available from http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004301571/
22. Lang, TF, Keyak, JH, Heitz, MW, Augat, P., Lu, Y., Mathur, A. and Genant, HK (1997) Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone 21, pp. 101-108.
23. Les, CM, Keyak, JH, Stover, SM, Taylor, KT and Kaneps, AJ (1994) Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography. J Orthop Res 12, pp. 822-833.
24. Levenston, ME, Beaupre, GS and van der Meulen, MC (1994) Improved method for analysis of whole bone torsion tests. J Bone Miner Res 9, pp. 1459-1465.
25. Martin, RB, Burr, DB and Sharkey, NA (1998) Skeletal tissue mechanics 1st ed, Springer, New York (NY)
26. Morgan, EF, Bayraktar, HH and Keaveny, TM (2003) Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36, pp. 897-904.
27. Orr, TE, Beaupre, GS, Carter, DR and Schurman, DJ (1990) Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty 5, pp. 191-200.
28. Piziali, RL, Hight, TK and Nagel, DA (1976) An extended structural analysis of long bones - application to the human tibia. J Biomech 9, pp. 695-701.
29. Press, WH, Teukolsky, SA, Vetterling, WT and Flannery, BP (1992) Numerical recipes in c: the art of scientific computing Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)
30. Reilly, DT and Burstein, AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8, pp. 393-405.
31. Rho, JY, Hobatho, MC and Ashman, RB (1995) Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 17, pp. 347-355.
32. Salathe Jr., EP, Arangio, GA and Salathe, EP (1989) An application of beam theory to determine the stress and deformation of long bones. J Biomech 22, pp. 189-199.
33. Schileo, E., Taddei, F., Malandrino, A., Cristofolini, L. and Viceconti, M. (2007) Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J Biomech 40:13, pp. 2982-2989.
34. Snyder, SM and Schneider, E. (1991) Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9, pp. 422-431.
35. Taddei, F., Pancanti, A. and Viceconti, M. (2004) An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med Eng Phys 26, pp. 61-69.
36. Viceconti, M., Bellingeri, L., Cristofolini, L. and Toni, A. (1998) A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. Med Eng Phys 20, pp. 1-10.
37. Wirtz, DC, Schiffers, N., Pandorf, T., Radermacher, K., Weichert, D. and Forst, R. (2000) Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realise anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J Biomech 33, pp. 1325-1330.
38. Yosibash, Z., Padan, R., Joskowicz, L. and Milgrom, C. (2007) A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in vitro experiments. J Biomech Eng 129, pp. 297-309.
39. Young, WC and Budynas, RG (2002) Roark's formulas for stress and strain 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York (NY)
40. van Eijden, TM (2000) Biomechanics of the mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11, pp. 123-136.
41. van der Meulen, MC, Beaupre, GS and Carter, DR (1993) Mechanobiologic influences in long bone cross-sectional growth. Bone 14, pp. 635-642.