Morphological and kinetic transformation of calcite crystal growth by prismatic-associated asprich sequences

Crystal Growth and Design

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1154-1160

  Kim, Il Won ^a,c   Giocondi, Jennifer L ^b   Orme, Christine ^b   Collino, Sebastiano ^a   Evans, John Spencer ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Soongsil University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61549133597     PISSN: 15287483     EISSN: 15287505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/cg070099m     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aizenberg, J.; Albeck, S.; Weiner, S.; Addadi, L. J. Cryst. Growth 1994, 142, 159-164.
2. Aizenberg, J.; Thachenko, A.; Weiner, S.; Addadi, L.; Hendler, G. Nature 2001, 412, 819-822.
3. (a) Belcher, A. M.; Wu, X. H.; Christensen, R. J.; Hansma, P. K.; Stucky, G. D.; Morse, D. E. Nature 1996, 381, 56-59.
4. (b) Falini, G.; Albeck, S.; Weiner, S.; Addadi, L. Science 1996, 271, 67-69.
5. (a) Weiss, I. M.; Tuross, N.; Addadi, L.; Weiner, S. J. Exp. Zool. 2002, 293, 478-491.
6. (b) Addadi, L.; Raz, S.; Weiner, S. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 959-970.
7. (c) Nassif, N.; Pinna, N.; Gehrke, N.; Antonietti, M.; Jager, C.; Colfen, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 2005, 102, 12653-12655.
8. Smith, B. L.; Schaffer, T. E.; Viani, M.; Thompson, J. B.; Frederick, N. A.; Kindt, J.; Belcher, A.; Stucky, G. D.; Morse, D. E.; Hansma, P. K. Nature 1999, 399, 761-769.
9. Li, X.; Chang, W. C.; Chao, Y. J.; Wang, R.; Chang, M. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 613-617.
10. Eichhorn, S. J.; Scurr, D. J.; Mummery, P. M.; Golshan, M.; Thompson, S. P.; Cernika, R. J. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 947-952.
11. Shen, X.; Belcher, A. M.; Hansma, P. K.; Stucky, G. D.; Morse, D. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32472-32481.
12. Marin, F.; Amons, R.; Guichard, N.; Stigter, M.; Meeker, A.; Luquet, G.; Layrolle, P.; Alcaraz, G.; Riondet, C.; Westbroek, P. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 33895-33908.
13. Dauphin, Y.; Curif, J. P.; Doucet, J.; Salome, M.; Susini, J.; Williams, C. T. Mar. Biol. 2003, 142, 299-304.
14. Pokroy, B.; Fitch, F. N.; Marin, F.; Kapon, M.; Adir, M.; Zolotoyabko, E. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 155, 96-103.
15. Gotliv, B.-A.; Kessler, N.; Sumerel, J. L.; Morse, D. E.; Tuross, N.; Addadi, L.; Weiner, S. Chem. Biol. Chem. 2005, 6, 304-314.
16. Tsukamoto, D.; Sarashina, I.; Endo, K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 320, 1175-1180.
17. Suzuki, M.; Murayama, E.; Inoue, H.; Ozaki, N.; Tohse, H.; Kogure, T.; Nagasawa, H. Biochem. J. 2004, 382, 205-213.
18. Collino, S.; Kim, I. W.; Evans, J. S. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 839-842.
19. Initially, we named the 42 AA C-terminal domain "DEAD-Acidic- 2". However, to avoid confusion with the individual subdomain names, we have chosen to rename the 42 AA sequence "Fragment-2".
20. Kim, I. W.; Darragh, M. R.; Orme, C.; Evans, J. S. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 5, 5-10.
21. Kim, I. W.; DiMasi, E.; Evans, J. S. Cryst. Growth Des. 2004, 4, 1113-1118.
22. Michenfelder, M.; Fu, G.; Lawrence, C.; Weaver, J. C.; Wustman, B. A.; Tarante, L.; Evans, J. S.; Morse, D. E. Biopolymers 2003, 70, 522-533.; errata 73: 299.
23. Teng, H. H.; Dove, P. M.; Orme, C. A.; De Yoreo, J. J. Science 1998, 282, 724-728.
24. A brief description of AFM tip interaction and potential imaging artifacts are warranted here. We were able to ascertain that tip interactions were not influencing our imaging via the following observations. First, with regard to potential scanning artifacts, we see no evidence of protein "piling up" at the edges of a scan box, which is a typical test to determine if the AFM tip is scraping material from the surface. This is tested by scanning a small scan area for several scans and then subsequently scanning a larger area. If material is being removed from the surface by the tip, then the material will pile up at the edges of the small scan (i.e., the snow plow effect) and this mark will be observed in the larger scan area. This phenomenon is always tested for in each experiment. Second, when we first introduce the polypeptides, we also halt imaging for 5 minutes (with the tip raised) to lessen the chance that the tip is influencing polypeptide-surface binding. Third, we also image with the lightest contact force possible by adjusting the set point frequently. The reason for using contact mode over tapping mode is that the image capture rate in tapping mode is too slow to quantify these step kinetics, and we do not see evidence of "snow plow" artifacts in contact mode.
25. Kim, I. W.; Morse, D. E.; Evans, J. S. Langmuir 2004, 20, 11664-11673.
26. (a) Cubelis, M. V.; Caillez, F.; Blundell, T. L.; Lovell, S. C. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2005, 58, 880-892.
27. (b) Chellgren, B. W.; Creamer, T. P. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 5864-5869.
28. (c) Eker, F.; Griebenow, K.; Cao, X.; Nafie, L. A.; Schweitzer-Stenner, R. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 613-621.
29. Fu, G.; Qiu, S. R.; Orme, C. A.; Morse, D. E.; De Yoreo, J. J. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2678-2684.
30. Mann, K.; Siedler, F.; Treccani, L.; Heinemann, F.; Fritz, M. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 1246-1254.
31. Treccani, L.; Mann, K.; Heinemann, F.; Fritz, M. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 2601-2608.
32. Walters, D. A.; Smith, B. L.; Belcher, A. M.; Paloczi, G. T.; Stucky, G. D.; Morse, D. E.; Hansma, P. K. Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 1425-1433.
33. Elhadj, S.; Salter, E. A.; Wierzbicki, A.; De Yoreo, J. J.; Han, N.; Dove, P. M. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 197-201.
34. Cabrera, N., Vermilyea, D. A. In Growth and Perfection of Crystals; Doremus, R. H., Roberts, B. W., Turnbull, D., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1958; p 393.
35. Sangwal, K. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. 1996, 32, 3-43.
36. 26.27 which implies that kink nucleation is likely the rate-limiting step for step growth, giving credence to this proposed scenario.