Accessing substance abuse treatment: Issues for parents involved with child welfare services

Child Welfare

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 63-93

  Rockhill, Anna ^a   Green, Beth L ^b   Newton Curtis, Linda ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NPC Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PARENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POVERTY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PARENTS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POVERTY; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 61549116238     PISSN: 00094021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (1997).
2. Amaro, H., & Beckman, L. J. (1987). A comparison of black and white women entering alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48(3), 220-228.
3. Bammer, G., & Weekes, S. (1994). Becoming an ex-user: Insights into the process and implications for treatment and policy. Drug and Alcohol Review, 13(3), 285-292.
4. Beckman, L. J. (1994). Barriers to alcoholism treatment for women. Journal of Alcohol Health & Research World, 18(3), 208-210.
5. Beckman, L. J., & Amaro, H. (1986). Personal and social difficulties faced by women and men entering alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47(2), 135-145.
6. Burford, G., & Hudson, J. (2001). Family group decision making: New directions in communitycentered child and family practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
7. Connolly, M. (1999). Effective participatory practice: Family group conferencing in child protection. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
8. Copeland, J. (1997). A qualitative study of barriers to formal treatment among women who self-managed change in addictive behaviors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14(2), 183-190.
9. Copeland, J., & Hall, W (1992). A comparison of women seeking drug and alcohol treatment in a specialist women's and two traditional mixed-sex treatment services. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1293-1302.
10. Courtney, M. E., & Barth, R. P. (1996, March/April). Race and child welfare services: Past research and future directions. Child Welfare, 75(2), 99-137.
11. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Blending perspectives and building common ground: A report to Congress on substance abuse and child protection. Washington, DC: Author.
12. Ebener, P., & Kilmer, B. (2003a). Barriers to treatment entry: Case studies of applicants approved for admission (Publication No. DRU-2949-PH). Santo Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center.
13. Ebener, P., & Kilmer, B. (2003b). Linking drug users with treatment: Admissions counselors describe the barriers (Publication No. DRU-2948-PH). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center.
14. Famularo, R., Kinscherff, R., Bunshaft, D., Spivak, G., & Fenton, T. (1989). Parental compliance to court-ordered treatment interventions in cases of child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 13, 507-514.
15. Farabee, D., & Leukefeld, C. G. (1998). Accessing drug-abuse treatment: Perceptions of outof-treatment injectors. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(2), 381-395.
16. Finkelstein, N. (1994). Treatment issues for alcohol- and drug-dependent pregnant and parenting women. Health & Social Work, 19(1).
17. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Green, B., & Rockhill, A. (2004, April). The impact of the Adoption and Safo Families Act (ASFA) on families with substance abuse issues: Outcomes from a mixed methods study. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Child Welfare League of America, Washington, DC.
19. Green, B., Rockhill, A., & Burrus, S. (2008). Why all the fuss about collaboration? Clarifying the role of interagency collaboration for substance abusing families involved with child welfare. Child Welfare.
20. Gutman, M., McKay, J., Ketterlinus, R., & McLellan, A. (2003). Potential barriers to work for substance-abusing women on welfare: Findings from the CASAWORKS for families pilot demonstration. Evaluation Review, 27(6), 681-706. (Pubitemid 39057321)
21. Hser, Y.-L, Maglione, M., Polinsky, M. L., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(3), 213-220. (Pubitemid 28302842)
22. Hudson, J., Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Galaway, B. (1996). Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy and practice. New York: Criminal Justice Press.
23. Ja, D. Y., & Aoki, B. (1993). Substance abuse treatment: Cultural barriers in the AsianAmerican community. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 25(1), 61-71.
24. Jayakody, R., Danziger, S., & Pollack, H. (2000). Welfare reform, substance use and mental health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25(4), 623-651.
25. Kail, B. L., & Elberth, M. (2002). Moving the Latina substance abuser toward treatment: The role of gender and culture. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 1(3), 3-16.
26. Ralling Knight, D., Logan, S. M., & Simpson, D. D. (2001). Predictors of program completion for women in residential substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(1), 1-18.
27. Kane-Cavaiola, C., & Rullo-Cooney, D. (1991). Addicted women: Their families' effect on treatment outcome. Journal of Chemical Dependency Treatment, 4(1), 111-119.
28. Kline, A. (1996). Pathways into drug user treatment: The influence of gender and racial/ethnic identity. Substance Use & Misuse, 31(3), 323-342.
29. Larsen, J. (2000). Court strategies under ASFA to help substance-using families recover. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 51(1), 1-8.
30. Lex, B. W. (1990). Prevention of substance abuse problems in women. In R. R. Watson (Ed.), Drug and alcohol abuse prevention. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
31. Lex, B. W. (1991). Some gender differences in alcohol and polysubstance users. Health Psychology, 10(2), 121-132.
32. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Lindsey, D. (1994). The welfare of children. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. McKay, J., Gutman, M., McLellan, A., Lynch, K., & Ketterlinus, R. (2003). Treatment services received in the CASAWORKS for families program. Evaluation Review, 27(6), 629-655.
35. Metsch, L. R., Rivers, J. E., Miller, M., Bohs, R., McCoy, C. B., Morrow, C. J., Bandstra, E. S., Jackson, V., & Gissen, M. (1995). Implementation of a family-centered treatment program for substance-abusing women and their children: Barriers and resolutions. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27(1), 73-83.
36. Morgenstern, J., Nakashian, M., Woolis, D. D., Gibson, F. M., Bloom, N. L., & Kaulback, B. G. (2003). CASAWORKS for families: A new treatment model for substance-abusing parenting women on welfare. Evaluation Review, 27(6), 583-596. (Pubitemid 39057317)
37. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1999). No safe haven: Children of substanceabusing parents. New York: Author.
38. Patton, M. E. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Pelton, L. (1989). For reasons of poverty: A critical analysis of the public child welfare system in the United States. New York: Praeger.
40. Porter, J. (1999). The street/treatment barrier: Treatment experiences of Puerto Rican injection drug users. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(14), 1951-1975.
41. Riehman, K. S., User, Y.-I., & Zeller, M. (2000). Gender differences in how intimate partners influence drug treatment motivation. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(4), 823-839.
42. Rittner, B. D., & Davenport, C. (2000). Effects of court-ordered substance abuse treatment in child protective services cases. Social Work, 45(2), 131-141.
43. Shireman, J. (2003). Critical issues in child welfare. New York: Columbia University Press.
44. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Thom, B. (1986). Sex differences in help-seeking for alcohol problems - 1. The barriers to help-seeking. British Journal of Addiction, 81, 777-788.
46. Tracy, E. M. (1994). Maternal substance abuse: Protecting the child, preserving the family. Social Work, 39(5), 534-540.
47. Wenger, L. D., & Rosenbaum, M. (1994). Drug treatment on demand - not! Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 26(1), 1-11.
48. Wenzel,S.L.,Koegel,P.,&Gelberg,L.(1996).Access- substanceabusetreatmentforhomelesswomenofreproductiveage. JournalofPsychoactiveDrugs,28(1),17-30.(Pubitemid26112105)
49. Westley, C. H. (2001). Residential substance abuse treatment for pregnant and postpartum women and their children: Treatment and policy implications. Child Welfare, 80(2), 179-198.
50. Wild, T. C., Roberts, A. B., & Cooper, E. L. (2002). Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research, 8(2), 84-93.
51. Young, N. K., & Gardner, S. G. (2002). Navigating the pathways: Lessons and promising practices in linking alcohol and drug services with child welfare (Publication No. SMA-02=3639).
52. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
53. Young, N. K., Gardner, S. G., & Dennis, K. (1998). Responding to alcohol and other drug problems in child welfare: Weaving together practice and policy. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America Press.