Casaworks for families: A new treatment model for substance-abusing parenting women on welfare

Evaluation Review

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 583-596

  Morgenstern, Jon ^a,b   Nakashian, Mary ^a   Woolis, Diana D ^a   Gibson, Fay M ^a   Bloom, Nancy L ^a   Kaulback, Brenda G ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Parenting; Substance abuse; Welfare

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARENT; PILOT STUDY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL WELFARE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PARENTS; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL WELFARE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 1542438994     PISSN: 0193841X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03258927     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Allen, K. A. 1995. Barriers to treatment for addicted African-American women. Journal of the National Medical Association 87:751-56.
2. Beckman, L. J., and K. M. Kocel. 1982. The treatment delivery system and alcohol abuse in women: Social policy implications. Journal of Social Issues 38:139-51.
3. Berlin, G. 2001. The 30-year tug-of-war: Can reform resolve welfare policy's thorniest conundrum? Brookings Review 19 (3): 34-38.
4. Brindis, C. D., G. Berkowitz, Z. Clayson, and B. Lamb. 1997. California's approach to perinatal substance abuse: Toward a model of comprehensive care. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 29:113-22.
5. Brown, A. 2001. Beyond work first- How to help hard-to-employ individuals get jobs and succeed in the workforce. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
6. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. 1996. Alcohol and other drug treatment: Policy choices in welfare reform. Report in collaboration with NASADAD. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7. Chandler, D., and J. Meisel. 2000. The prevalence of mental health, alcohol and other drug, & domestic violence issues among CalWORKs participants in Kern and Stanislaus Counties, Sacramento: California Institute for Mental Health.
8. Danziger, S., M. Cocoran, C. Heflin, C. Kalil, A. Levine, D. Rosen, K. Seefeldt, K. Siefert, and R. Tolman. 2000. Barriers to employment of welfare recipients. Unpublished manuscript, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, Poverty Research and Training Center.
9. Grella, C. E. 1997. Services for perinatal women with substance abuse and mental health disorders: The unmet need. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 29:67-78.
10. Grella, C. E., and V. Joshi. 1999. Gender differences in drug treatment careers among clients in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 25 (3): 385-406.
11. Gustavson, N. S., and J. R. Rycraft. 1993. The multiple service needs of drug dependent mothers. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 10 (2): 141-51.
12. Jayakody, R., S. Danziger, and H. Pollack. 2000. Welfare reform, substance use, and mental health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 7:421-33.
13. Klein, D., D. Crim, and E. Zahnd. 1997. Perspectives of pregnant substance-abusing women: Findings from the California prenatal needs assessment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 29:55-66.
14. Legal Action Center. 1997. Making welfare reform work: Tools for confronting alcohol and drug problems among welfare recipients. New York: Author.
15. Nakashian, M., and E. Moore. 2001. Identifying substance abuse among TANF eligible families (Technical Assistance Publication No. 26). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
16. National Center of Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. 1999. Building bridges: States response to substance abuse and welfare reform. New York: Author.
17. Nelson-Zlupko, L., E. Kauffman, and M. M. Dore. 1995. Gender differences in drug addiction and treatment: Implications for social work interventions with substance-abusing women. Social Work 40:45-54.
18. Pavetti, L., K. Olson, N. Pindus, and M. Pernas. 1997. Designing welfare to work programs for families facing personal or family challenges: Lessons from the field. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
19. Reed, B. G. 1985. Drug misuse and dependency in women: The meaning and implications of being considered a special population or minority group. International Journal of the Addictions 20:13-62.
20. Sawhill, I. 2001. From welfare to work. Brookings Review 19 (3): 4-8.
21. Sisco, C. B., and C. L. Pearson. 1994. Prevalence of alcoholism and drug abuse among female AFDC recipients. Health and Social Work 19:75-77.
22. Thompson, T. G. 2001. Welfare reform's next step, Brookings Review 19 (3): 2-3.
23. Wellisch, J., B. Perrochet, and M. D. Anglin. 1997. Afterwood: Future directions for perinatal alcohol and drug treatment services. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 29:123-25.
24. Woolis, D. D. 1998. Family works: Substance abuse treatment and welfare reform. Public Welfare 3:23-29
25. Zlotnick, C., K. Franchino, N. St. Claire, K. Cox, and M. St. John. 1996. The impact of outpatient drug services on abstinence among pregnant and parenting women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 13 (3): 195-202.