Greenhouse gas mitigation supply curve for the United States for transport versus other sectors

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 222-229

  Lutsey, Nicholas ^a   Sperling, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Cost effectiveness; Energy policy; Vehicle efficiency

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENERGY POLICY;

COST EFFECTIVE; GHG MITIGATION; GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION; MEDIUM TERM; MOTOR VEHICLE; SUPPLY CURVES; TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY; VEHICLE EFFICIENCY;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; POLLUTION POLICY; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 61549114381     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2008.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. An F., Stodolsky F., Vyas A., Cuenca R., and Eberhardt J.J. Scenario analysis of hybrid Class 3-7 heavy vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineers (2000) 2000-01-0989
2. An, F., DeCicco, J., Ross, M., 2001, Assessing the Fuel Economy Potential of Light Duty Vehicles, SAE paper 2001-01FTT-31, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale.
3. Austin, T.C., Dulla, R.G., Carlson, T.R., 1999. Alternative and Future Technologies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions form Road Vehicles. Prepared for Committee on Road Vehicle Technology and Fuels, Natural Resources Canada, Sierra Research, Inc., Sacramento.
4. California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2004. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Rulemaking, Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Regulations to Control Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Motor Vehicles, . Accessed in January 2008, October 22, 2005. August 6.
5. California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2008. Climate Change Draft Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change, CARB Sacramento.
6. California Energy Commission (CEC) and California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2003. Reducing California's Petroleum Dependence. Appendix C, Attachment B, . Publication # 600-03-005SD, May.
7. Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP), 1995. Report of the Emissions Inventory Sub Group. International Civil Aviation Organization (as cited in Lee, 2000).
8. Creyts J., Derkach A., Nyquist S., Ostrowski K., and Stephenson J. Reducing US Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much at What Cost? Executive Report (2007), McKinsey & Company December
9. DeCicco J., An F., and Ross M. Technical Options for Improving the Fuel Economy of US Cars and Light Trucks by 2010-2015 (2001), American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC April
10. Delucchi M.A. Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Lifecycle Analyses of Transportation Fuels (2004), Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis UCE-ITS-RR-04-4
11. Dutch Civil Aviation Department (DCAD), 1997. Aviation Emissions and Evaluation of Reduction Options (as cited in Lee, 2000).
12. Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. (EEA). 2001. Technology and Cost of Future Fuel Economy Improvements for Light-Duty Vehicles. Draft Final Report, Prepared for the National Academies National Research Council, Washington DC.
13. Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU), 1994. An Appraisal of UK Energy Research, Development, Demonstration and Dissemination, FTSU, London.
14. European Conference of Ministers of Transport and International Energy Agency (ECMT and IEA), 2005. Making Cars More Fuel Efficient: Technology for Real Improvements on the Road, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
15. Ewing R., Bartholomew K., Winkelman S., Walters J., and Chen D. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change (2008), Urban Land Institute, Berlin
16. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., and Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319 (2008) 1235-1238
17. Farrell A.E., Plevin R.L., Turner B.T., Jones A.D., O'Hare M., and Kammen D.M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311 5760 (2006) 506-508
18. Farrell A., and Sperling D. A Low Carbon Fuel Standard for California: Part 1: Technical Analysis (2007), Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis UCD-ITS-RR-07-07
19. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2002. Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options for Compact Sedan and Sport Utility Vehicles. EPRI 10006892, Palo Alto.
20. Greene D.L. Why CAFE worked. Energy Policy 26 (1998) 595-614
21. Greene D.L., German J., and Delucchi M.A. Fuel economy: The case for market failure. In: Cannon J., and Sperling D. (Eds). Reducing Climate Impacts in the Transportation Sector (2008), Springer, Amsterdam
22. Hill J., Nelson E., Tilman D., Polasky S., and Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103 (2006) 11206-11210
23. 2 emissions from the light-duty vehicle fleet. In: Kopp, R.J., Pizer W.A. (Eds.), Assessing US Climate Policy Options. Resources for the Future, November.
24. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1999. IPCC Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, IPCC, Montreal.
25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Working Group III: Mitigation 3.8.6 Technological and Economic Potential. .
26. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2008. Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. IEA, Paris.
27. Lee, J.J., 2000. Historical and Future Trends in Aircraft Performance, Cost, and Emissions. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
28. Lipman T.E., and Delucchi M.A. Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Design Retail and Lifecycle Cost Analysis (2003), Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis UCD-ITS-RR-03-8
29. Lovins A.B., Datta E.K., Bustnes O.-E., Koomey J.G., and Glasgow N.J. Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation for Profits Jobs and Security (2004), Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass
30. Lutsey, N., 2008. Prioritizing Climate Change Mitigation Alternatives: Comparing Transportation Technologies to Options in Other Sectors. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCD-ITS-RR-08-15. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
31. Lutsey N., and Sperling D. America's bottom-up climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 673-685
32. Muster T. Fuel Savings Potential and Costs Considerations for US Class 8 Heavy Duty Trucks through Resistance Reductions and Improved Propulsion Technologies until 2020 (2000), Massachusetts Institute of Technology EL 00-001
33. National Research Council (NRC), 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
34. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 2008. Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis: Corporate Average Fuel Economy for MY 2011-2015 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
35. National Research Council (NRC), 1992. Aeronautical Technologies for the Twenty-First Century.
36. Northeast States Center for a Clean Air Future (NECCAF), 2004. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Light-Duty Motor Vehicles. NECCAF, Boston.
37. Paltsev S., Reilly J., Jacoby H., Gurgel A., Metcalf G., Sokolov A., and Holak J. Assessment of US Cap-and-Trade Proposals (2007), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Report 146
38. Parker N., Tittmann P., Hart Q., Lay J., Cunningham J., Jenkins B., Nelson R., Skog K., Milbrandt A., Gray E., and Schmidt A. Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western States: Development of Supply Scenarios Linked to Policy Recommendations Task 3: Spatial Analysis and Supply Curve Development (2008), University of California, Davis
39. Plotkin S., Duleep K.G., and Greene D. Examining the Potential for Voluntary Fuel Economy Standards in the United States and Canada (2002), Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne ANL/ESD/02-5
40. Plotkin, S., Santini, D., Vyas, A., Anderson, J.L., Wang, M., He, J., Bharathan, D., 2001, Hybrid Vehicle Technology Assessment: Methodology, Analytical Issues, and Interim Results, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD/02-2, Argonne.
41. Santini, Danilo, J., Vyas, A.D., Anderson, J.L., An, F., 2001. Estimating Trade-Offs Along the Path to the PNGV 3X Goal. 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
42. Schaefer A., and Jacoby H.D. Vehicle technology under CO2 constraint: a general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 975-985
43. Sheehan, J., Camobreco, V., Duffield, J., Graboski, M., Shapouri, H., 1998. Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus: Final Report, NREL/SR-580-24089, Washington, DC.
44. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Tokgoz S., Hayes D., and Yu T.-H. Use of US cropland for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 319 (2008) 1238-1240
45. Small K., and Van Dender K. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. Energy J. 28 (2007) 25-51
46. Sperling D., and Gordon D. Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability (2009), Oxford University Press, Oxford
47. TAIX L.L.C. Full Fuel Cycle Assessment Well to Wheels Energy Inputs Emissions and Water Impacts (2007), Sacramento
48. Turrentine T.S., and Kurani K.S. Car buyers and fuel economy?. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 1213-1223
49. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2005. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential for US Forestry and Agriculture. EPA 430-R-05-006, Washington, DC.
50. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2007. Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2005. EPA-430-R-07-002, Washington, DC.
51. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2007b. Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Expanded Renewable and Alternative Fuels Use. EPA-420-F-07-035, Washington, DC.
52. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2008. EPA Analysis of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008. USEPA, Washington, DC.
53. US Energy Information Administration (US EIA), 2007. Annual Energy Outlook 2007. US Department of Energy Report DOE/EIA-0383(2007), Washington, DC.
54. US Energy Information Administration (US EIA), 2008. Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (Early Release). US Department of Energy Report DOE/EIA-0383(2008), Accessed in January 2008.
55. Vyas A., Saricks C., and Stodolsky F. The Potential Effect of Future Energy-Efficiency and Emissions-Improving Technologies on Fuel Consumption of Heavy Trucks (2002), Argonne National Laboratory US Department of Energy, Washington, DC ANL/ESD/02-4
56. Wang, M., 2005. Updated Energy and a Greenhouse Gas Emission Results of Fuel Ethanol. In: 15th International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels, San Diego.
57. Weiss, Malcolm, A., John, B., Heywood, Elisabeth M. Drake, Andreas Schafer, and Felix F. AuYeung. 2000. On the Road in 2020: A Life-Cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies. Energy Laboratory Report # MIT EL 00-003, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.