Erratum: A Review of Mesothelioma Information on the World Wide Web (Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2009) 4(1) (102–104)(S1556086415309382)(10.1097/JTO.0b013e31818e5ed7));A review of mesothelioma information on the World Wide Web

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 102-104

  Tan, Benjamin H L ^a,b   Kostapanagiotou, Konstantinos ^a   Jilaihawi, Ali N A ^a  

^a HAIRMYRES HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Internet; Mesothelioma; Patient education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GOOGLE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MESOTHELIOMA; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEARCH ENGINE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; REVIEW;

HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MESOTHELIOMA;

EID: 61549085946     PISSN: 15560864     EISSN: 15561380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.02.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, et al. Utilization of the internet by oncology patients to obtain cancer related information. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:395a.
2. Helft PR, Hlubocky FJ, Gordon EJ, et al. Hope and the media in advanced cancer patients. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:633a.
3. O'Connor JB, Johanson JF. Use of the web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA 2000;284:1962-1964.
4. Pendas I, Sanchez M, Santos L, Tepperman B. Ten basic world-wide web sites for Florida physicians. J Fla Med Assoc 1996;83:628-630.
5. Steinbrook R. Searching for the right search - reaching the medical literature. N Engl J Med 2006;354:47.
6. Giustini D. How Google is changing medicine. BMJ 2005;331:1487- 1488.
7. Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 1998;30:107-117.
8. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor-let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997;277: 1244-1245.
9. Health On the Net Foundation. HON code of conduct (HONcode) for medical and health web sites: principles. Available at: www.hon.ch/ HONcode/Conduct. html. Accessed August 20, 2008.
10. Soot LC, Moneta GL, Edwards JM. Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:84 -91.
11. Aslam N, Bowyer D, Wainwright A, Theologis T, Benson M. Evaluation of Internet use by paediatric orthopaedic outpatients and the quality of information available. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005;14:129-133.
12. Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82-A:1540 -1543.
13. Hanif F, Abayasekara K, Willcocks L, et al. The quality of information about kidney transplantation on the World Wide Web. Clin Transplant 2007;21:371-376.
14. Hellawell GO, Turner KJ, Le Monnier KJ, Brewster SF. Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics. BJU Int 2000;86:191-194.
15. Libertiny G, Perkins JM, Magee TR, Galland RB. Varicose veins on the internet. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;20:386-389.
16. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ 2000;320:526-527.
17. Tang PC, Newcomb C. Informing patients A guide for providing patient health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5:563-570.
18. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the Internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ 2004;328:564.
19. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 1997;314:1875-1879.
20. Silverstein C, Marais H, Henzinger M, et al. Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. ACMSIGIR Forum 1999;33:6-12.
21. Black PC, Penson DF. Prostate cancer on the Internet-information or misinformation? J Urol 2006;175:1836-1842.
22. Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, et al. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 2002;324:577-581.
23. Health On the Net Foundation. Mission and Users. Available at: http:// www.hon.ch/Global/HON-mission.html. Accessed August 20, 2008.
24. Health On the Net Foundation. HONcode Toolbar. Available at: http:// www.hon.ch/HONcode/Plugin/Plugins.html. Accessed August 20, 2008.
25. Morel V, Chatton A, Cochand S, Zullino D, Khazaal Y. Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2008.
26. Khazaal Y, Fernandez S, Cochand S, et al. Quality of web-based information on social phobia: a cross-sectional study. Depress Anxiety 2008;25:461-465.