Erratum (DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00996-1);Prostate Cancer on the Internet-Information or Misinformation?

Journal of Urology

Volumn 175, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1836-1842

  Black, Peter C ^b   Penson, David F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

internet; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RATING SCALE; UROLOGY;

EID: 33645965882     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.050     Document Type: Erratum

References (17)

1. Hellawell G.O., Turner K.J., Le Monnier K.J., and Brewster S.F. Urology and the Internet. an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics. BJU Int 86 (2000) 191
2. Diefenbach M.A., Dorsey J., Uzzo R.G., Hanks G.E., Greenberg R.E., Horwitz E., et al. Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 20 (2002) 55
3. Pautler S.E., Tan J.K., Dugas G.R., Pus N., Ferri M., Hardie W.R., et al. Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology 57 (2001) 230
4. Smith R.P., Devine P., Jones H., DeNittis A., Whittington R., and Metz J.M. Internet use by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Urology 62 (2003) 273
5. Henson D.E. Cancer and the Internet. Cancer 86 (1999) 373
6. Berry D.L., Ellis W.J., Woods N.F., Schwien C., Mullen K.H., and Yang C. Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer. the influence of personal factors. Urol Oncol 21 (2003) 93
7. Patel H.R.H., Mirsadraee S., and Emberton M. The patient's dilemma. prostate cancer treatment choices. J Urol 169 (2003) 828
8. http://www.mitretek.org/hiti/showcase/documents/criteria.html. Accessed April 4, 2002
9. Berland G.K., Elliott M.N., Morales L.S., Algazy J.I., Kravitz R.L., Broder M.S., et al. Health information on the Internet. accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285 (2001) 2612
10. Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Vaughan Jr. E.D., and Wein A.J. Campbell's Urology. 7th ed. (1998), W. B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia
11. Al-Bahrani A., and Plusa S. The quality of patient-orientated internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 6 (2004) 323
12. Gilliam A.D., Speake W.J., Scholefield J.H., and Beckingham I.J. Finding the best from the rest. evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85 (2003) 44
13. Lee C.T., Smith C.A., Hall J.M., Waters W.B., and Biermann J.S. Bladder cancer facts. accuracy of information on the Internet. J Urol 170 (2003) 1756
14. Darmoni S.J., Amsallem E., Haugh M., Lukacs B., Leroux V., Thirion B., et al. Level of evidence as a future gold standard for the content quality of health resources on the internet. Methods Inf Med 42 (2003) 220
15. Fagerlin A., Rovner D., Stableford S., Jentoft C., Wei J.T., and Holmes-Rovner M. Patient education materials about the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. a critical review. Ann Intern Med 140 (2004) 721
16. http://pubs.ama-assn.org/how_principle.htm. Accessed July 8, 2004
17. http://www.hon.org.Accessed March 25, 2003