Argumentation Studies in the Wake of the New Rhetoric

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 267-283

  Frank, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449349693     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2004.11821612     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Twentieth-Century Classics. Rev. and enl. ed. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1994.
2. Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2d enl. ed. New York: Meridian Books, 1958.
3. Arnold, Carroll. “Introduction.” The Realm of Rhetoric. Ed. Chaïm, Perelman. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press, 1982.
4. Brandes, Paul D., “Rev. Traité De L'argumentation; La Nouvelle Rhétorique.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 45 (1959): 86.
5. Cohen, Shaul, and David A., Frank. “Jerusalem and the Riparian Simile.” Political Geography 21 (2002): 745–60.
6. Conley, Thomas M., Rhetoric in the European Tradition. New York: Longman, 1990.
7. Crosswhite, James. The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument. Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996.
8. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob, Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum, 1992.
9. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob, Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck, Henkemans. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum, 1996.
10. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob, Grootendorst, and Tjark, Kruiger. Handbook of Argumentation Theory; a Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. Studies of Argumentation in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis; 7. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications, 1987.
11. Foss, Sonja K., Karen A., Foss, and Robert, Trapp. Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric. 3rd ed. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 2002.
12. Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.
13. Frank, David A., “After the New Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 89 (2003): 253–61.
14. Frank, David A., “Dialectical Rapprochement in the New Rhetoric.” Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1998): 111–37.
15. Frank, David A., “The New Rhetoric, Judaism, and Post- Enlightenment Thought: The Cultural Origins of Perelmanian Philosophy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 83 (1997): 311–331.
16. Frank, David A. Rev., Frans H., van Eemeren and Rob, Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992). In Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (1993): 251–253.
17. Frank, David A., and Michelle K., Bolduc. “Chaïm Perelman's ‘First Philosophies and Regressive Philosophy.’” Commentary and Translation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (2003): 177–207.
18. Frank, David A., and Michelle K., Bolduc. “From Vita Contemplativa to Vita Activa: Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tytca's Rhetorical Turn.” Advances in the History of Rhetoric. Forthcoming, 2004
19. Gilbert, Michael A., Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
20. Glover, Jonathan. Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.
21. Gross, Alan G., The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.
22. Gross, Alan G., and Ray D., Dearin. Chaïm Perelman. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.
23. Gross, Alan G., Joseph E., Harmon, and Michael, Reidy. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
24. Hauser, Gerard A., “Henry W. Johnstone, Jr.: Reviving the Dialogue of Philosophy and Rhetoric.” The Review of Communication 1 (2001): 1–25.
25. Inch, Edward. S., and Barbara, Warnick. Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.
26. Johnstone, Henry W., “New Outlooks on Controversy.” Review of Metaphysics 12 (1958): 57–67.
27. Johnstone, Henry W., “A New Theory of Philosophical Argumentation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (1954): 244–52.
28. Klinger, Geoffrey D., “Rev. Frans H. Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.” Argumentation and Advocacy 31 (1994): 111–13.
29. Lockwood, Richard. The Reader's Figure: Epideictic Rhetoric in Plato, Aristotle, Bossuet, Racine and Pascal. Genève, Switzerland: Librarne Droz, 1996.
30. Maneli, Mieczysaw. Perelman's New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century. Library of Rhetorics; V. 1. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
31. Mootz, Francis J., “Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Theory.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journals (1998): 492–547.
32. Natanson, Maurice Alexander, and Henry W., Johnstone. Philosophy, Rhetoric and Argumentation. University Park,: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1965.
33. Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. “Rencontre Avec La Rhétorique.” Logique et analyse 3 (1963): 1–15.
34. Oliner, Samuel P., and Pearl M., Oliner. The Altruistic Personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York; Free Press, 1988.
35. Oliver, Robert T., “Philosophy and/or Persuasion.” La Théorie De L 'argumentation; Perspectives Et Applications. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1963. 571–80.
36. Perelman, Chaïm. Letter to Emily M Schossberger. 29th November 1967. File: Traite de l' Argumentation, Chaïm Perelman Papers, Archives, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
37. Perelman, Chaïm. “Etude Sur Gottlob Frege (Résumé De La Dissertation De L'auteur).” Revue de l'Université de Bruxelles 2 (1939): 224–27.
38. Perelman, Chaïm. An Historical Introduction to Philosophical Thinking. Trans. Kenneth A., Brown. Studies in Philosophy 3. New York: Random House, 1965.
39. Perelman, Chaïm. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. Trans. Londres J., Petrie, Routledge & Kegan, Paul. New York: Humanities Press, 1963.
40. Perelman, Chaïm. “The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians, Remembrances and Comments.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 188–96.
41. Perelman, Chaïm. De La Justice. Bruxelles: Universite Libre de Bruxelles., 1945.
42. Perelman, Chaïm. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and Its Applications. Dordrecht, Holland: Boston, 1979.
43. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie, Olbrechts-Tyteca. “De La Temporalité Comme Caractère De L'argumentation.” Tempo, Archivio di filosofia 2 (1958): 115–33.
44. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie, Olbrechts-Tyteca. Traité De L'argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique. 5e édition. ed. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 1988.
45. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie, Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: [Ind.] University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
46. Schiappa, Edward. Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Rhetorical Philosophy and Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2003.
47. Schiappa, Edward. “Dissociation in the Arguments of Rhetorical Theory.” Journal of the American Forensics Association 22 (1985): 72–82.
48. Sloane, Thomas O., ed. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
49. Stevenson, Charles L., Ethics and Language. New Haven, Conneticut and London: Yale University Press and Oxford University Press, 1947.
50. Tindale, Christopher W., Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Suny Series in Logic and Language. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
51. Toulmin, Stephen Edelston., An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics. Cambridge Eng.: University Press, 1950.
52. Vickers, Brian. “Philosophy: Rhetoric and Philosophy.” Oxford Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Ed. Thomas, Sloan. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2001. 583–92.
53. Wamick, Barbara. “Conviction.” Oxford Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Ed. Thomas, Sloan, 2001. 171–75.
54. Wamick, Barbara. “Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's Contribution to the New Rhetoric.” Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women. Ed. Molly Meijer, Wertheimer. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998.
55. Warnick, Barbara, and Susan, Kline. “The New Rhetoric's Argument Schemes: A Rhetorical View of Practical Reasoning.” Argumentation and Advocacy 29 (1992): 1–15.
56. Zarefsky, David. “Future Directions in Argumentation Theory and Practice.” Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede. Ed. Janice, Schuetz, and Robert, Trapp. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Wave-land Press, 1990. 287–314.