Performance of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the discrimination of prevalent asymptomatic osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

Rheumatology International

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 551-556

  El Maghraoui, A ^a   Morjane, F ^a   Mounach, A ^a   Ghazi, M ^a   Nouijai, A ^a   Achemlal, L ^a   Bezza, A ^a   Ghozlani, I ^a  

^a MILITARY HOSPITAL MOHAMMED V   (Morocco)

Author keywords

DXA; Osteoporosis; QUS; Vertebral fracture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE DENSITOMETRY; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RADIATION ATTENUATION; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; CALCANEUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MOROCCO; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; SPINAL FRACTURES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 61449236289     PISSN: 01728172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-008-0751-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. GM Blake I Fogelman 2007 The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis Postgrad Med J 83 509 517 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057505
2. El Maghraoui A, Roux C (2008) DXA scanning in clinical practice. QJM 2008
3. A Stewart LG Walker RW Porter DM Reid WR Primrose 1999 Predicting a second hip fracture J Clin Densitom 2 363 370 10.1016/S1094-6950(06)60401-0
4. C Durosier D Hans MA Krieg AM Schott 2006 Prediction and discrimination of osteoporotic hip fracture in postmenopausal women J Clin Densitom 9 475 495 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.06.002
5. A El Maghraoui BA Koumba I Jroundi L Achemlal A Bezza MA Tazi 2005 Epidemiology of hip fractures in 2002 in Rabat, Morocco Osteoporos Int 16 597 602 10.1007/s00198-004-1729-8
6. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman 1999 Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria Osteoporos Int 10 441 449 10.1007/ s001980050252
7. EW Gregg AM Kriska LM Salamone 1997 The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk Osteoporos Int 7 89 99 10.1007/BF01623682
8. A El Maghraoui AA Do Santos Zounon I Jroundi 2005 Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice Osteoporos Int 16 1742 1748 10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2
9. A El Maghraoui L Achemlal A Bezza 2006 Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice J Clin Densitom 9 281 286 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.03.014
10. A El Maghraoui AA Guerboub L Achemlal 2006 Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Moroccan women J Clin Densitom 9 454 460 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.07.001
11. A El Maghraoui AA Guerboub A Mounach 2007 Body mass index and gynecological factors as determinants of bone mass in healthy Moroccan women Maturitas 56 375 382 10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.10.004
12. HK Genant J Li CY Wu JA Shepherd 2000 Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment J Clin Densitom 3 281 290 10.1385/JCD:3:3:281
13. MF Sim MD Stone CJ Phillips 2005 Cost effectiveness analysis of using quantitative ultrasound as a selective pre-screen for bone densitometry Technol Health Care 13 75 85
14. B Frediani C Acciai P Falsetti 2006 Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk Calcif Tissue Int 79 223 229 10.1007/s00223-005-0098-4
15. MG Gluer HW Minne CC Gluer 2005 Prospective identification of postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high vertebral fracture risk by radiography, bone densitometry, quantitative ultrasound, and laboratory findings: results from the PIOS study J Clin Densitom 8 386 395 10.1385/JCD:8:4:386
16. S Gonnelli C Cepollaro L Gennari 2005 Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men Osteoporos Int 16 963 968 10.1007/s00198-004-1771-6
17. AM Schott B Kassai Koupai D Hans 2004 Should age influence the choice of quantitative bone assessment technique in elderly women? The EPIDOS study Osteoporos Int 15 196 203 10.1007/s00198-003-1505-1
18. CC Gluer R Eastell DM Reid 2004 Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study J Bone Miner Res 19 782 793 10.1359/JBMR.040304
19. KM Knapp GM Blake I Fogelman DV Doyle TD Spector 2002 Multisite quantitative ultrasound: Colles' fracture discrimination in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 13 474 479 10.1007/s001980200057
20. F Hartl A Tyndall M Kraenzlin 2002 Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study J Bone Miner Res 17 321 330 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.321
21. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman 2002 A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip Calcif Tissue Int 71 207 211 10.1007/s00223-001-2074-y
22. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman 2001 Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination? Osteoporos Int 12 471 477 10.1007/s001980170092
23. K Briot C Roux 2005 What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19 951 964 10.1016/j.berh.2005.06.004
24. SR Cummings DM Black MC Nevitt 1993 Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Lancet 341 72 75 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8
25. MM Pinheiro CH Castro A Frisoli Jr VL Szejnfeld 2003 Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound measurements is similar to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Brazilian women population with osteoporotic fracture Calcif Tissue Int 73 555 564 10.1007/s00223-002-1096-4
26. A Peretz V De Maertelaer M Moris M Wouters P Bergmann 1999 Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-Ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures J Clin Densitom 2 127 133 10.1385/JCD:2:2:127
27. DW Trone D Kritz-Silverstein DG von Muhlen DL Wingard E Barrett-Connor 2007 Is radiographic vertebral fracture a risk factor for mortality? Am J Epidemiol 166 1191 1197 10.1093/aje/kwm206
28. MC Nevitt SR Cummings KL Stone 2005 Risk factors for a first-incident radiographic vertebral fracture in women > or = 65 years of age: the study of osteoporotic fractures J Bone Miner Res 20 131 140
29. ML Frost GM Blake I Fogelman 2001 Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 16 406 416 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.406
30. D Pearson T Masud O Sahota S Earnshaw D Hosking 2003 A comparison of calcaneal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and calcaneal ultrasound for predicting the diagnosis of osteoporosis from hip and spine bone densitometry J Clin Densitom 6 345 352 10.1385/JCD:6:4:345
31. C Wuster P Heilmann J Pereira-Lima J Schlegel K Anstatt T Soballa 1998 Quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) for the evaluation of osteoporosis risk: reference data for various measurement sites, limitations and application possibilities Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 106 277 288
32. J Damiano S Kolta R Porcher C Tournoux M Dougados C Roux 2006 Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment J Clin Densitom 9 66 71 10.1016/j.jocd.2005.11.002
33. RD Chapurlat F Duboeuf HO Marion-Audibert B Kalpakcioglu BH Mitlak PD Delmas 2006 Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture Osteoporos Int 17 1189 1195 10.1007/s00198-006-0121-2
34. JA Clowes R Eastell NF Peel 2005 The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study Osteoporos Int 16 1794 1802 10.1007/s00198-005-1931-3