Notes in support of a relational social work perspective: A critical review of the relational literature with implications for macro practice

Smith College Studies in Social Work

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 5-16

  Pozzuto, Richard ^a   Arnd Caddigan, Margaret ^a   Averett, Paige ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feminist theory; Institutional ethnography; Macro social work practice; Relational psychoanalytic theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449223522     PISSN: 00377317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00377310802634491     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Borden, W. (2000). The relational paradigm in contemporary psychonalysis: Toward a psychodynamically informed social work perspective. Social Science Review, 74(3), 352-379.
2. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Chodorow, N. (1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
4. Comstock, D. L., & Qin, D. (2005). Relational-cultural theory: A framework for relational development across the life span. In D. Comstock (Ed.), Diversity and development: Critical contexts that shape our lives and relationships (pp. 25-46). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
5. Eismann, E. (2001). Unitas: The clinic of the street - Community mental health in practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 71(2), 305-321.
6. Gilligan, C. (1983). In a different voice; psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Kanter, J. (2000). Beyond psychotherapy: Therapeutic relationships in community care. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 70(3), 397-426.
9. Levin, I. (2007). Discourses within and about social work. In L. Dominelli (Ed.), Revitalising communities in a globalising world (pp. 43-66). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
10. Lykes, M. B. (1985). Gender and individualistic vs. collective bases of social individuality, Journal of Personality Psychology, 53, 357-383.
11. Martell, D. (1998). Feminist community organizing on a college campus. Ajfilia, 13(4), 393-404.
12. Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
13. Mitchell, S. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
14. Mitchell, S., & Aron, L. (Eds.). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Ornstein, E. D., & Ganzer, C. (2005). Relational social work: A model for the future. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary: Social Services, 86(4), 565-572.
16. Qin, D. (2004). Toward a critical feminist perspective of culture and self. Feminism & Psychology, 14(2), 297-312.
17. Radden, J. (1996). Relational individualism and feminist therapy. Hypatia, 11(1), 71-96.
18. Rasmussen, B. M., & Mishna, F. (2003). The relevance of contemporary psychodynamic theories to teaching social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 74(1), 31-47.
19. Saari, C. (2005). The contribution of relational theory to social work practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 75(3), 3-14.
20. Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology: for people. Toronto, Canada: AltaMira Press.
21. Surrey, J. L. (1987). Relationship and empowerment (Work in Progress, No. 30). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center Working Paper Series.
22. Tosone, C. (2004). Relational social work: Honoring the tradition. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 74(3), 475-487.