Responsiveness and clinical utility of the geriatric self-efficacy index for urinary incontinence

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 470-475

  Tannenbaum, Cara ^a,b   Brouillette, Judith ^b   Michaud, Julie ^a   Korner Bitensky, Nicol ^c,d   Dumoulin, Chantale ^a,e   Corcos, Jacques ^f   Tu, Le Mai ^g   Lemieux, Marie Claude ^f   Ouellet, Stephane ^h   Valiquette, Luc ^h  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

^b Faculty of Medicine   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d CENTRE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION OF GREATER MONTREAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^f MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical utility; Responsiveness; Self efficacy; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CONCEPT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINE INCONTINENCE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COHORT STUDIES; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 61449206254     PISSN: 00028614     EISSN: 15325415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02146.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tannenbaum C, Brouillette J, Korner-Bitensky N et al. Creation and testing of the Geriatric Self-Efficacy index for Urinary Incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008 56 : 542 547.
2. Carroll DL. The importance of self-efficacy expectations in elderly patients recovering from coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung 1995 24 : 50 59.
3. Tinetti ME, Mendes de Leon CF, Doucette JT et al. Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community-living elders. J Gerontol 1994 49 : M140 M147.
4. Fortinsky RH, Bohannon RW, Litt MD et al. Rehabilitation therapy self-efficacy and functional recovery after hip fracture. Int J Rehab Res 2002 25 : 241 246.
5. Van Leeuwen JH, Castro R, Busse M et al. The placebo effect in the pharmacologic treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol 2006 50 : 440 452.
6. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Locher JL et al. Urodynamic changes associated with behavioural and drug treatment of urge incontinence in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002 50 : 808 816.
7. Elser DM, Wyman JF, McClish DK et al. The effect of bladder training, pelvic floor muscle training, or combination training on urodynamic parameters in women with urinary incontinence. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 1999 18 : 427 436.
8. Tannenbaum C, Corcos J. Outcomes in urinary incontinence: Reconciling clinical relevance with scientific rigour. Eur Urol 2008 53 : 1151 1161.
9. Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L et al. Outcome measures in urogynaecology: The clinican's perspective. Int Urogynecol J 2007 18 : 273 279.
10. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In : Pajares F, Urdan TC, eds. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, 2006, pp 307 337.
11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 : 189 198.
12. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ et al. ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004 23 : 322 330.
13. Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC et al. Noninvasive outcome measures of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: A multicenter study of the micturition diary and pad test. J Urol 2000 164 : 698 701.
14. Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003 189 : 98 101.
15. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG et al. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: Development of a new measure. Urology 1996 47 : 67 71.
16. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM et al. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: Further development of the Incontinence Quality of Life instrument (I-QOL). Urology 1999 53 : 71 76.
17. Yalcin I, Viktrup L. Comparison of physician and patient assessments of incontinence severity and improvement. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007 18 : 1291 1295.
18. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987 40 : 171 178.
19. Why measurement properties are important. In : Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW et al. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making, 2nd Ed. Hamilton : BC Decker Inc, 2002, pp 26 41.
20. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000 53 : 459 468.
21. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P et al. Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994 74 : 528 533.
22. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle D. Health status measures: Strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996 76 : 1109 1123.
23. Rockwood K, Howlett S, Stadnyk K et al. Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 2003 56 : 736 743.