Comparison of three vegetation monitoring methods: Their relative utility for ecological assessment and monitoring

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1001-1008

  Godinez Alvarez H ^a   Herrick, J E ^b   Mattocks, M ^b   Toledo, D ^b   Van Zee, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foliar cover; Precision; Rangeland vegetation; Rank order correlation; Species accumulation curves; Species richness

Indexed keywords

EROSION; SOILS; VEGETATION; VIDEO CAMERAS;

FOLIAR COVER; PRECISION; RANGELAND VEGETATION; RANK-ORDER CORRELATION; SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES; SPECIES RICHNESS;

ECOLOGY;

BIOINDICATOR; BIOMONITORING; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOMINANCE; GRASS; PLANT COMMUNITY; RANGELAND; SHRUB; SOIL EROSION; SOIL SURFACE; VEGETATION COVER;

CHIHUAHUAN DESERT; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 61349132854     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bonham C.D. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation (1989), John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA p. 352
2. Brady W.W., Mitchell J.E., Bonham C.D., and Cook J.W. Assessing the power of the point-line transect to monitor changes in plant basal cover. J. Range Manage. 48 (1995) 187-190
3. Campbell P., Comiskey J., Alonso A., Dallmeier F., Nunez P., Beltran H., Baldeon S., Nauray W., de la Colina R., Acurio L., and Udvardy S. Modified Whittaker plots as an assessment and monitoring tool for vegetation in a lowland tropical rainforest. Environ. Monit. Assess. 76 (2002) 19-41
4. Colwell, R.K., 2005. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User's Guide and Application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
5. Cox S.B., Bloch P.C., Stevens R.D., and Huenneke L.F. Productivity and species richness in an arid ecosystem: a long-term perspective. Plant Ecol. 186 (2006) 1-12
6. Dethier M.N., Graham E.S., Cohen S., and Tear L.M. Visual versus random-point percent cover estimations: 'objective' is not always better. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 96 (1993) 93-100
7. Elzinga C.L., Salzer D.W., Willoughby J.W., and Gibbs J.P. Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations (2001), Blackwell Science, Inc., Great Britain p. 360
8. Floyd D.A., and Anderson J.E. A comparison of three methods for estimating plant cover. J. Ecol. 75 (1987) 221-228
9. Hanley T.A. A comparison of the line-interception and quadrat estimation methods of determining shrub canopy coverage. J. Range Manage. 31 (1978) 60-62
10. Hatton T.J., West N.E., and Johnson P.S. Relationships of the error associated with ocular estimation and actual total cover. J. Range Manage. 39 (1986) 91-92
11. Havstad K.M., and Herrick J.E. Long-term ecological monitoring. Arid Land Res. Manag. 17 (2003) 389-400
12. Heinz Center. The State of the Nation's Ecosystems: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, USA p. 288
13. Helm D.J., and Mead B.R. Reproducibility of vegetation cover estimates in south-central Alaska forests. J. Veg. Sci. 14 (2003) 33-40
14. Herrick J.E., Van Zee J.W., Havstad K.M., Burkett L.M., and Whitford W.G. Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range (2005), The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA p. 236
15. Hochstrasser T., Kröel-Dulay G., Peters D.P., and Gosz J.R. Vegetation and climate characteristics of arid and semi-arid grasslands in North America and their biome transition zone. J. Arid Environ. 51 (2002) 55-78
16. Huenneke L.F., Clason D., and Muldavin E. Spatial heterogeneity in Chihuahuan Desert vegetation: implications for sampling methods in semi-arid ecosystems. J. Arid Environ. 47 (2001) 257-270
17. Huenneke L.F., Anderson J.P., Remmenga M., and Schlesinger W.H. Desertification alters patterns of aboveground net primary production in Chihuahuan ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 8 (2002) 247-264
18. Korb J.E., Covington W.W., and Fule P.Z. Sampling techniques influence understory plant trajectories after restoration: an example from ponderosa pine restoration. Restor. Ecol. 11 (2003) 504-515
19. Laliberte A.S., Rango A., Herrick J.E., Fredrickson E.L., and Burkett L. An object-based image analysis approach for determining fractional cover of senescent and green vegetation with digital plot photography. J. Arid Environ. 69 (2007) 1-14
20. Leis S.A., Engle D.M., Leslie J.D.M., Fehmi J.S., and Kretzer J. Comparison of vegetation sampling procedures in a disturbed mixed-grass prairie. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 83 (2003) 7-15
21. Messe R.J., and Tomich P.A. Dots on the rocks: a comparison of percent cover estimation methods. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 165 (1992) 59-73
22. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment (2003), Island Press, Washington, DC, USA p. 245
23. National Research Council. Rangelands health. New Methods to Classify Inventory and Monitor Rangelands (1994), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA p. 200
24. National Research Council. Ecological Indicators for the Nation (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA p. 198
25. Niemi G.J., and McDonald M.E. Application of ecological indicators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 (2004) 89-111
26. Prosser C.W., Skinner K.M., and Sedivec K.K. Comparison of 2 techniques for monitoring vegetation on military lands. J. Range Manage. 56 (2003) 446-454
27. Spaeth K.E., Pierson F.B., Herrick J.E., Shaver P.L., Pyke D.A., Pellant M., Thompson D., and Dayton B. New proposed national resources inventory protocols on nonfederal rangelands. J. Soil Water Conserv. 58 (2003) 18A-21A
28. Stohlgren T.J., Falkner M.B., and Schell L.D. A modified Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 117 (1995) 113-121
29. Stohlgren T.J., Bull K.A., and Otsuki Y. Comparison of rangeland vegetation sampling techniques in the central grasslands. J. Range Manage. 51 (1998) 164-172
30. Sykes J.M., Horril A.D., and Mountford M.D. Use of visual cover assessments as quantitative estimators of some British woodland taxa. J. Ecol. 71 (1983) 437-450
31. Verrill S., and Johnson R.A. Confidence bounds and hypothesis tests for normal distribution coefficients of variation. Commun. Stat. -Theor. M. 36 (2007) 2187-2206